Started By
Message

re: Per the CDC 98% of people tested have been negative

Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:07 pm to
Posted by frogglet
Member since Jul 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:07 pm to
This is not good news. Good news would be if it was already widely circulating. If the numbers of current infected are actually accurate then the mortality rate is actually high. The numbers of cases are growing exponentially still...
Posted by CoonassatTEXAS
Austin, TX
Member since Nov 2005
1047 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:08 pm to
Do you have a link? They mentioned that stat during the press conference today, but I’m pretty sure they were talking about Korea. Who, you know is testing like 50k people a day
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:08 pm to
I think what should give everyone pause is that Wuhan has 11 million people in it, yet their total infection numbers are only 67k for the entire province.

This virus was spreading unchecked for over 2 months before the lockdown. The numbers should be much higher (and probably are).
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:08 pm to
Link is coronavirus.gov

LINK
This post was edited on 3/14/20 at 7:10 pm
Posted by frogglet
Member since Jul 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

If both numbers are true, then the original estimates weren't just inaccurate.

They were WILDLY inaccurate.


What original estimates?? This has been public knowledge about SK the entire time. We've known they have been doing over 10,000 tests a day but currently only have 8,000 cases. Do the math.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

This is not good news. Good news would be if it was already widely circulating. If the numbers of current infected are actually accurate then the mortality rate is actually high. The numbers of cases are growing exponentially still...
Well yeah.

But a high mortality rate with virtually no one catching it is about the same as a high contagion rate with virtually no one dying.

The PROBLEM was when they were reporting a high contagion rate AND a high mortality rate.
quote:

The numbers of cases are growing exponentially still...
Low contagion rate lowers the S-curve inflection point
Posted by CoonassatTEXAS
Austin, TX
Member since Nov 2005
1047 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:10 pm to
I just went to their webpage and didn’t see that star mentioned. Do you have a direct link?
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31635 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:10 pm to
I hope so
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

What original estimates?? This has been public knowledge about SK the entire time. We've known they have been doing over 10,000 tests a day but currently only have 8,000 cases. Do the math.

I've BEEN doing the math which is why I've BEEN making fun of the alarmists and will continue to do so
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14089 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

So much fricking panic the last 2 days.


Do you know how stupid you look?
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:12 pm to
Can’t be as stupid as your arse the last 3 years over muh Russia and every other bullshite spewed by the media and DNC.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26780 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:12 pm to
Clearly faulty tests.

Should have ordered the tests that were positive.
Posted by Mister Flawless
Tuscaloosa
Member since Jul 2011
381 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Do you know how stupid you look?


So an item that was in reference to my wife's reaction to this situation is now your item to jump on. Dude have a Coke, a smile, and shut the frick up!
Posted by frogglet
Member since Jul 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Low contagion rate lowers the S-curve inflection point


Every expert is saying the inflection point coming earlier in some countries is because of the extraordinary measures they took to contain it. Otherwise there is no reason for the virus not to reach 40%-70% of the total population.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Every expert is saying the inflection point coming earlier in some countries is because of the extraordinary measures they took to contain it.
Well of course.

It's not like low contagion rate is the ONLY factor.

But, if you couple good actions with a low contagion rate, you basically have a disease of insignificance.
Posted by Freight Joker
Member since Aug 2019
2736 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

This is not good news. Good news would be if it was already widely circulating. If the numbers of current infected are actually accurate then the mortality rate is actually high. The numbers of cases are growing exponentially still...


We’re on month 4 and have basically self-quarantined the country. How much more time does this virus need to catch us all?
Posted by frogglet
Member since Jul 2018
1161 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:22 pm to
Well, since March 1, we have been doubling cases about every 3 days. At that rate, it would take about 1.5 months to reach about 50%.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:28 pm to
I really hope to see white patio furniture "I survived" memes after this is over.
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:29 pm to
Most likely the number in the US peaks in 2 weeks, everyone goes to back to normal life.
Posted by BoomNation
wetumpka. alabama
Member since Feb 2015
2099 posts
Posted on 3/14/20 at 7:34 pm to
link?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram