- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
frogglet
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1161 |
| Registered on: | 7/25/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
I'm just saying, from the beginning he was trying to sell this to newspapers and present himself as someone who wasn't a Trump supporter but was a left-wing activist who therefore shouldn't be condemned and arrested or whatever. He's obviously a dumbass and I'm glad he is getting the same charges as everyone else. But it doesn't mean all the trump supporters who have been arrested for beating police with flags and fire extinguishers aren't real, sorry.
3
re: John Sullivan's Discord Server Discovered, UPDATE: Sullivan indicted for his actions
Posted by frogglet on 1/14/21 at 10:05 pm to the808bass
quote:
Who said he mind-controlled them?
Well, usually you guys don't try to actually explain anything because then it would all just fall apart. Better to just say "Boooom... hooooly shite" and "this proves everything", etc.
You guys know he was described in articles from the very beginning as a left-wing activist who was in there recording? I'm glad he was arrested too, but what is supposed to be news here? How did he mind-control the Trump supporters into breaking into the capitol?
quote:
there's nothing in this video that squarely and blatantly proves these were antifa or non-Trump supporters
Dude, there's nothing in the video that even indirectly indicates it, either. This place is honestly hilarious to browse sometime.
quote:
This will be the end of social media. Or at least, the platforms that currently dominate the landscape. They'll all go under for this.
What is happening is what always happens with something like this. Regulations will be introduced to control what websites can and can't do. The regulations will massively increase the costs of running a website and will also serve to freeze the industry in place indefinitely.
quote:
Yeap rt wing crazies. Or maybe just maybe, you left wing nut jobs project every thing you do wrong onto others. Durrr durr.....
Dude, you serious? Google Steven Carrillo. Why am I not surprised your didn't get the news in your echo chamber...
quote:
shite. First Europe now Mexico. What's going on? I can't be on the same side as the globalists, I'm going to have to change my opinion.
Because they are actual lefties who are arguing that a business shouldn't have the power to decide who gets to post on their own website. You are aligned with them because you are willing to throw away your principles at the drop of a hat if it helps your team in the short term.
Kind of an inconvenient fact that a right-wing boogaloo dumbass was the one who set the building on fire :lol:
re: Was the burning of the Minneapolis police station an "assault on democracy"?
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 3:15 pm to RidiculousHype
Funny thing about that... LINK
quote:
they are a private company, why do you want the government controlling a private company?
Exactly. The parler stuff is different and there are actual arguments there about unfair business practices, especially with Apple IMO. But if a website wants to ban me that's their business. I'm not going to make a federal case out of it. It's just a damn website.
re: Jan 11, 2021- Pursuant to EO 13848....
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 11:59 am to DingLeeBerry
So why didn't John Ratcliffe get on prime time TV to tell America that this was happening? Not as serious as the Iranian emails?
re: List of Companies Utilizing Authoritarian Tactics Against Americans
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 11:56 am to CheEngineer
I was banned from thedonald.win. Add it to the list.
re: Jan 11, 2021- Pursuant to EO 13848....
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 11:51 am to LSUAngelHere1
LINK
Seems to be atleast partially about the Biden stuff.
quote:
Derkach has previously worked with Rudy Giuliani to dig up damaging information on President Donald Trump’s Democratic opponent, Joe Biden, and his son Hunter.
Seems to be atleast partially about the Biden stuff.
re: Germany/Angela Merkel calls out Big Tech for censorship of Trump
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 11:29 am to The Pirate King
So now this board is seriously lining up with the Europeans and is ready to declare people have fundamental rights to post shite on other people's websites... gotcha...
re: Germany/Angela Merkel calls out Big Tech for censorship of Trump
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 11:24 am to theunknownknight
quote:
When Germany says the USA is too far left, we have arrived
Imagine thinking regulating how businesses moderate their own websites is to the right.. :lol:
re: Parler is gone for now as Amazon terminates hosting
Posted by frogglet on 1/11/21 at 2:52 am to LordSaintly
re: Video of the shooter for those that haven’t seen it
Posted by frogglet on 1/7/21 at 1:35 pm to the808bass
quote:
There’s no way to square the laissez faire attitude of the cops on her side of the barricade with the deadly force on the other side.
The officers who left were the ones I was referring to who were shoved up against the wall initially. They seemed to be overpowered and in no position to fight the mob. According to the interview the kid in the blue hoodie gave afterwards though, both the cops and the secret service on the other side warned them not to cross the barrier.
quote:
There were cops on both sides of the door almost equal number of the people in the hall. It wasn't like a 100 vs 1 situation.
It was very much a hundred to 1 situation. There were hundreds if not thousands of them already in the capitol building. They had already gotten to the 2nd floor, while congress was being ushered to the 3rd floor. I'm not really going to spend more time explaining reality to you people. I'm long past the point of being surprised at your ability to deny it.
Just as a little thought experiment to see how off the rails you are, what if a group of thousands of antifa protestors had breached the White House and were breaking through barriers to the Oval Office? While the first family was still in the process of being secured?
re: Video of the shooter for those that haven’t seen it
Posted by frogglet on 1/7/21 at 12:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
The 10 cops on the other side of the window seemed to disagree.
The cops with rifles and body armor had literally just arrived from the stairwell. A few seconds later she was shot. The 3 officers who were shoved up against the wall were in no position to take control of that mob.
quote:
If this is the use of force policy, do you still think this is a good shoot because she may get in the vicinity of "VIPs?"
It is reasonable to believe that the people they are protecting were in imminent danger from that mob. The standard allows them to use lethal force to protect other people as well as themselves.
quote:
DHS LEOs do not have a duty to retreat to avoid the reasonable use of
force, nor are they required to wait for an attack before using reasonable force to
stop a threat.
This is a mob chanting "Hang Mike Pence" as they are storming the capitol building where Mike Pence is.
LINK
It is also reasonable to assume that the members of Congress were in danger. You guys fully understand this of course. In the other threads showing members of Congress huddled in fear under their seats you'll say 'of course they should be afraid' and cheer the fact that they are in fear of their lives. It is blindingly obvious that this was a mob that was targeting them and the VP. Using lethal force to hold them back was reasonable.
Popular
16
