- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:46 pm to antibarner
He won’t
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:46 pm to teke184
quote:
sn’t that considered obstruction of justice? Or is that only if you attempt to lean on a witness?
Or intimidation of a public official. Maybe Comey Jr went to threaten him
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:49 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The fix is in
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:52 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I was a law clerk for a federal district judge. My boss would NEVER have taken that meeting.
Well this judge is a democrat appointed by fjb, so the corrupted fruit doesn't fall far from the poisoned tree.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:55 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Don't they call that "ear wigging"?
Per CNN: Comey's son-in-law had 30 min meeting with presiding judge before the indictment
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:56 pm to RobbBobb
SFP: this is common practice in the legal world. In fact, Comey’s son-in-law was probably offering his assistance to the judge.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:59 pm to dnm3305
quote:
And then resigned lol, they are about to rig the frick out of this
He's going to be on slim Jim's defense team
Posted on 9/26/25 at 7:59 pm to KCT
quote:
The skeptic in me has to wonder why they were meeting if Comey hadn't even been indicted yet. It's almost like they ALREADY KNEW he would be the presiding judge.
That's a good point. I think in multi-judge divisions, the judge presiding (just for procedural questions) over the Grand Jury is normally not the same judge who presides over the trial if there is an indictment.
The Alexandria division has four judges...did the son-in-law guess? Good catch. I would like to hear an innocent explanation if there is one.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:01 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
I haven't seen him in too many of these threads. Maybe his Grok is acting up and he doesn't know how to answer 
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:03 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The Alexandria division has four judges...did the son-in-law guess? Good catch. I would like to hear an innocent explanation if there is one.
It smells like rotten fish. Recuse now.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:03 pm to dbbuilder79
quote:
I haven't seen him in too many of these threads. Maybe his Grok is acting up and he doesn't know how to answe
Not since he was accused of being a 4chubbies alter....
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:11 pm to MasterDigger
It's possible, since the indictment hadn't happened yet, that the judge didn't know at the time of the meeting that an indictment was coming and/or that he would be assigned to hear the case.
However, once he learns of the indictment, and realizes that he JUST had a meeting with Comey's son-in-law, he's gotta' recuse.
I'm a judge, and I can think of very few instances where I'd take a one on one meeting with the State/prosecutor. It's possible the meeting was completely coincidental and had nothing to do with the indictment (doubtful) but even if that's true, the appearance of fairness would mandate that I recuse.
However, once he learns of the indictment, and realizes that he JUST had a meeting with Comey's son-in-law, he's gotta' recuse.
I'm a judge, and I can think of very few instances where I'd take a one on one meeting with the State/prosecutor. It's possible the meeting was completely coincidental and had nothing to do with the indictment (doubtful) but even if that's true, the appearance of fairness would mandate that I recuse.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:34 pm to Scott68
quote:
the appearance of fairness would mandate that I recuse.
That should be a no-brainer.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 8:53 pm to RobbBobb
How come there were multiple Comey family members involved in some of the highest cases involving our government? Like, how does that happen? Son in law here smooching it up with the judge who will oversee his daddy in laws criminal case he was working to get squashed. Then Comey's literal daughter handled the Diddy case and everything somehow mysteriously.
What gives?
What gives?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:13 pm to psk_Vol
quote:
What gives?
When your family is embedded into the DOJ, you think you can get away with undermining elections, perjury, and obstruction
FAFO
Posted on 9/26/25 at 9:16 pm to thermal9221
If it’s not them, then it’s going to be us. The only question remaining is the timetable
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:09 pm to RobbBobb
Good fock him
Posted on 9/26/25 at 10:11 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Comey's son-in-law had 30 min meeting with presiding judge before the indictment
should be enough to disqualify the judge from the case
Posted on 9/27/25 at 12:27 am to RobbBobb
Settle down. Settle down.
As usual, RobbBobb fricked up the facts.
Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards Jr., was in Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala's courtroom and met with her, NOT District Court Judge Michael Nachmanoff, the judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia who will handle the Comey case.
As usual, RobbBobb fricked up the facts.
Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards Jr., was in Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala's courtroom and met with her, NOT District Court Judge Michael Nachmanoff, the judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia who will handle the Comey case.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News