- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Scott68
| Favorite team: | Washington |
| Location: | Washington Coast |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Attorney |
| Number of Posts: | 245 |
| Registered on: | 3/20/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
More Seattle Absurdity
Posted by Scott68 on 11/4/25 at 1:58 am
Story below, but here are the high points:
Unlicensed street vendors have taken over the areas surrounding T-Mobile Park (Mariners) and Lumen Field (Seahawks).
Licensed street vendors are mad.
However, local government can't punish the unlicensed vendors because the unlicensed vendors don't have business names or addresses. Shocking!
The story linked below further outlines the absolute absurdity of this entire situation and the continued fall of western civilization.
Unlicensed vendors don't use names or addresses, so they can't be punished.
Unlicensed street vendors have taken over the areas surrounding T-Mobile Park (Mariners) and Lumen Field (Seahawks).
Licensed street vendors are mad.
However, local government can't punish the unlicensed vendors because the unlicensed vendors don't have business names or addresses. Shocking!
The story linked below further outlines the absolute absurdity of this entire situation and the continued fall of western civilization.
Unlicensed vendors don't use names or addresses, so they can't be punished.
Similar theft of $1 million in craft whiskey from this distillery in Washington.
Westland Distillery Whiskey Theft
Westland Distillery Whiskey Theft
re: Per CNN: Comey's son-in-law had 30 min meeting with presiding judge before the indictment
Posted by Scott68 on 9/26/25 at 8:11 pm to MasterDigger
It's possible, since the indictment hadn't happened yet, that the judge didn't know at the time of the meeting that an indictment was coming and/or that he would be assigned to hear the case.
However, once he learns of the indictment, and realizes that he JUST had a meeting with Comey's son-in-law, he's gotta' recuse.
I'm a judge, and I can think of very few instances where I'd take a one on one meeting with the State/prosecutor. It's possible the meeting was completely coincidental and had nothing to do with the indictment (doubtful) but even if that's true, the appearance of fairness would mandate that I recuse.
However, once he learns of the indictment, and realizes that he JUST had a meeting with Comey's son-in-law, he's gotta' recuse.
I'm a judge, and I can think of very few instances where I'd take a one on one meeting with the State/prosecutor. It's possible the meeting was completely coincidental and had nothing to do with the indictment (doubtful) but even if that's true, the appearance of fairness would mandate that I recuse.
To Narax specifically ....
I appreciate your lengthy take down of my post; however, I don't think you said what you think you said.
(I won't comment on the repeated Nazi references, as I thought that calling people Nazi's was something we were leaving for the left to continue to spew).
My post was intended to demonstrate how a fringe/radical minority has co-opted an entire group of people who don't support or believe in their ideology and have successfully convinced a vast majority of the public that there are no ideological differences among that group.
Your post illustrated exactly what I was saying by presuming that my daughter (as a lesbian) has some affirmative obligation to overtly distance herself from this group; otherwise, she can be rightfully categorized as a "supporter" of that group.
Why? Because you too have been brainwashed into believing that every lesbian (in this case), individually, is automatically part of a group that they've never been asked to join, but have instead simply been drafted into? (That's basically what you said ... after your endorsement of "furries".)
I assume you belong to some specific ethnic group and sexual orientation. Do you feel obligated to publicly distance yourself from the fringe elements of that group? As a white heterosexual male, I don't feel obligated to walk around with a t-shirt on that says, "I'm not a Klansman" or "I like women".
But, since you seem to require specifics so that I/she can prove our bona fides to you, within the last week, she learned that a trans person had been assigned to share her 4-person dorm room with her. The school didn't inform her; she reached out to learn about her roommates and discovered it on her own.
She has since contacted the school, and after receiving significant shaming and push-back, was assigned to a different room. She reached out to other students to determine if this has happened to them and she's formed a group to assist those students in getting room changes.
That is probably why this topic has struck a nerve with me. (And before you tell me about my obligations in dealing with her school, trust me, they've heard from me, and they will hear much more from me).
Now, what have you done this week to speak out against trans people besides posting on this message board? Speak up or be part of the problem, right?
I appreciate your lengthy take down of my post; however, I don't think you said what you think you said.
(I won't comment on the repeated Nazi references, as I thought that calling people Nazi's was something we were leaving for the left to continue to spew).
My post was intended to demonstrate how a fringe/radical minority has co-opted an entire group of people who don't support or believe in their ideology and have successfully convinced a vast majority of the public that there are no ideological differences among that group.
Your post illustrated exactly what I was saying by presuming that my daughter (as a lesbian) has some affirmative obligation to overtly distance herself from this group; otherwise, she can be rightfully categorized as a "supporter" of that group.
Why? Because you too have been brainwashed into believing that every lesbian (in this case), individually, is automatically part of a group that they've never been asked to join, but have instead simply been drafted into? (That's basically what you said ... after your endorsement of "furries".)
I assume you belong to some specific ethnic group and sexual orientation. Do you feel obligated to publicly distance yourself from the fringe elements of that group? As a white heterosexual male, I don't feel obligated to walk around with a t-shirt on that says, "I'm not a Klansman" or "I like women".
But, since you seem to require specifics so that I/she can prove our bona fides to you, within the last week, she learned that a trans person had been assigned to share her 4-person dorm room with her. The school didn't inform her; she reached out to learn about her roommates and discovered it on her own.
She has since contacted the school, and after receiving significant shaming and push-back, was assigned to a different room. She reached out to other students to determine if this has happened to them and she's formed a group to assist those students in getting room changes.
That is probably why this topic has struck a nerve with me. (And before you tell me about my obligations in dealing with her school, trust me, they've heard from me, and they will hear much more from me).
Now, what have you done this week to speak out against trans people besides posting on this message board? Speak up or be part of the problem, right?
The over-the-top anti-social deviants (trans, "furries", etc.) have done a wonderful job of attaching themselves to the gay/lesbian portion of society.
If you are gay/lesbian you get pulled into these debates as if you are somehow obligated to support trans ideology, or it is just assumed that you support that ideology.
As the father of a lesbian, I can see the effort she has to go through to distance herself from the LGBTQIA+++++ community, and what is PERCEIVED as their shared values, when none of those things are true.
My daughter struggles with the notion that if she does not accept all people, will people still accept her? It makes me sad as a parent, because she holds none of the values that the trans community foists upon her, and yet she feels that if she makes her views known, it will justify HER being rejected by others. It's a tough spot.
She just wants to be viewed as an individual and to be judged accordingly.
The LGBTQIA+++++ alliance has hijacked the lives of many who want no part of that grouping.
If you are gay/lesbian you get pulled into these debates as if you are somehow obligated to support trans ideology, or it is just assumed that you support that ideology.
As the father of a lesbian, I can see the effort she has to go through to distance herself from the LGBTQIA+++++ community, and what is PERCEIVED as their shared values, when none of those things are true.
My daughter struggles with the notion that if she does not accept all people, will people still accept her? It makes me sad as a parent, because she holds none of the values that the trans community foists upon her, and yet she feels that if she makes her views known, it will justify HER being rejected by others. It's a tough spot.
She just wants to be viewed as an individual and to be judged accordingly.
The LGBTQIA+++++ alliance has hijacked the lives of many who want no part of that grouping.
re: Security failure. Again.
Posted by Scott68 on 9/11/25 at 1:34 pm to Ace Midnight
I can't stop thinking the EXACT same thing.
One person in a position of overwatch, even if they aren't armed, would make a significant difference, and in this case, probably a lifesaving one.
One person in a position of overwatch, even if they aren't armed, would make a significant difference, and in this case, probably a lifesaving one.
Had he not aspired to be anything else (President?), he was poised to be the Rush Limbaugh of a new generation.
A person to guide a righteous cause with clarity and insight, but with even more universal appeal than Rush.
Now that hope, that guide, has been snuffed out, with no one in the wings to take up that throne, much as was the case with Rush.
A person to guide a righteous cause with clarity and insight, but with even more universal appeal than Rush.
Now that hope, that guide, has been snuffed out, with no one in the wings to take up that throne, much as was the case with Rush.
re: On this day 33 years ago: The Ruby Ridge standoff began
Posted by Scott68 on 8/21/25 at 2:10 pm to the808bass
Here's some stuff I remember from being there:
The main fed barricade was at the intersection of 2 logging roads. The barricade was at the entrance to the road that went up the hill to Weaver's cabin. That is where my friend and I hung out.
The road that it intersected with was not blocked off or obstructed in any way, so you could literally drive right up to the fed barricade, which is what a LOT of people did, most of whom were Weaver supporters.
There was also a contingent of Aryan Nation guys that would speed up the road in the backs of pick-ups, hurling insults at the feds, and then speed back down the road. This went on continuously. I only bring this up because had those guys just made a right turn, they could have mowed down the feds. That's how lax the security situation was at the main barricade.
If this sort of thing happened today, you wouldn't be able to get within miles of the roads leading to the event.
After my friend and I left the scene, we stopped to eat at a diner that was just down the road. It was later in the evening, and when we walked in we sat next to a table of about 7-8 people that looked to be in their mid/late 20's, early 30s.
We figured out that they were stringers from AP, UPI, Reuters, (etc.) and they were all there eating and waiting to use the one pay phone to file their nightly reports. (This was pre-reliable cell service). It was a party atmosphere, and they were all bouncing their reports off of each other to figure out what to say.
Very surreal experience.
The main fed barricade was at the intersection of 2 logging roads. The barricade was at the entrance to the road that went up the hill to Weaver's cabin. That is where my friend and I hung out.
The road that it intersected with was not blocked off or obstructed in any way, so you could literally drive right up to the fed barricade, which is what a LOT of people did, most of whom were Weaver supporters.
There was also a contingent of Aryan Nation guys that would speed up the road in the backs of pick-ups, hurling insults at the feds, and then speed back down the road. This went on continuously. I only bring this up because had those guys just made a right turn, they could have mowed down the feds. That's how lax the security situation was at the main barricade.
If this sort of thing happened today, you wouldn't be able to get within miles of the roads leading to the event.
After my friend and I left the scene, we stopped to eat at a diner that was just down the road. It was later in the evening, and when we walked in we sat next to a table of about 7-8 people that looked to be in their mid/late 20's, early 30s.
We figured out that they were stringers from AP, UPI, Reuters, (etc.) and they were all there eating and waiting to use the one pay phone to file their nightly reports. (This was pre-reliable cell service). It was a party atmosphere, and they were all bouncing their reports off of each other to figure out what to say.
Very surreal experience.
I was in my 2nd year of law school at Gonzaga (Spokane) at the time and my best friend and I drove to Ruby Ridge and hung out at the scene while the feds kept everything on lock down.
We were there the day before Bo Gritz showed up and helped negotiate the surrender.
One of the most surreal experiences of my life and even though going there with my friend was more of a "let's go see what we can find" stupid move, I'm really glad I went, because looking back on that experience, it really set the tone for so many things that came later.
We were there the day before Bo Gritz showed up and helped negotiate the surrender.
One of the most surreal experiences of my life and even though going there with my friend was more of a "let's go see what we can find" stupid move, I'm really glad I went, because looking back on that experience, it really set the tone for so many things that came later.
All this discussion and no one notices that Mike Engleberg comes out (#24) for the home run celebration?
He hasn't aged a bit from the Bad News Bears movies.
He hasn't aged a bit from the Bad News Bears movies.
Her name is Bru Lucas. (She has a sister that's hot as well)
She looked better before she started filling her body with stuff to "enhance her appearance", but she's still hot.
You're welcome.

She looked better before she started filling her body with stuff to "enhance her appearance", but she's still hot.
You're welcome.
re: RIP Slick Watts
Posted by Scott68 on 3/17/25 at 3:16 am to SirWinston
I was in elementary school during his era, and EVERYONE wanted to "be" Slick Watts when playing hoops at recess.
re: Eric Clapton announces limited US Tour
Posted by Scott68 on 3/4/25 at 11:46 pm to Bayou Warrior 64
With regards to the set list, I would agree that none of those songs are "bad"; however, here are some of the songs that were not in the set list:
Change the World
Tears in Heaven
I Can't Stand It
Bad Love
Pretending
Lay Down Sally
It's in the Way that You Use It
Tearing Us Apart
After Midnight
No Alibis
Forever Man
My Father's Eyes
She's Waiting
Knockin' on Heaven's Door
That's a pretty sizeable chunk of his catalog (all of which charted) to leave out of a live show, and I think that was the impetus for my disappointment.
Change the World
Tears in Heaven
I Can't Stand It
Bad Love
Pretending
Lay Down Sally
It's in the Way that You Use It
Tearing Us Apart
After Midnight
No Alibis
Forever Man
My Father's Eyes
She's Waiting
Knockin' on Heaven's Door
That's a pretty sizeable chunk of his catalog (all of which charted) to leave out of a live show, and I think that was the impetus for my disappointment.
re: Eric Clapton announces limited US Tour
Posted by Scott68 on 3/4/25 at 4:21 am to tigerfan84
Saw Clapton at the old Key Arena (now Climate Pledge Arena) in Seattle in 2011. The show was sold out.
I wasn't a huge Clapton fan, but I knew he was a "bucket list" concert for me, and I was familiar with his entire body of work, so I was very eager to see him.
Robert Cray opened for him, and he was great, unfortunately, Clapton was a disappointment. Of his entire set-list, I only remember recognizing 3 songs, Layla, Badge and Cocaine.
I know this is going to sound stupid and almost sacrilegious to say, but the guitar soloing ... in every song ... was overwhelming, and not in a good way. Every song, and I do me EVERY song, had a lengthy (5-10 minutes) guitar solo.
I get it, he's a Guitar God, but after a while, everything sounded the same and the concert just sorta' droned on. The venue almost seemed to lose interest, until he broke into Layla and Cocaine, other than that, the crowd quickly lost energy. I can remember contemplating leaving the show.
I also remember him making the audience wait a long time for him to come out for an encore, and I remember talking to people around me and all of us thinking he'd come out and play 2 or 3 of his hits for the encore. He did not.
He came out and played another song I was unfamiliar with, and had never heard before, and then busted into another guitar solo ... and, not joking ... by the time the song was over, the arena was more than 1/2 empty.
Hopefully, if you're going to see him on this limited tour, he'll play the stuff that he is best known for.
I wasn't a huge Clapton fan, but I knew he was a "bucket list" concert for me, and I was familiar with his entire body of work, so I was very eager to see him.
Robert Cray opened for him, and he was great, unfortunately, Clapton was a disappointment. Of his entire set-list, I only remember recognizing 3 songs, Layla, Badge and Cocaine.
I know this is going to sound stupid and almost sacrilegious to say, but the guitar soloing ... in every song ... was overwhelming, and not in a good way. Every song, and I do me EVERY song, had a lengthy (5-10 minutes) guitar solo.
I get it, he's a Guitar God, but after a while, everything sounded the same and the concert just sorta' droned on. The venue almost seemed to lose interest, until he broke into Layla and Cocaine, other than that, the crowd quickly lost energy. I can remember contemplating leaving the show.
I also remember him making the audience wait a long time for him to come out for an encore, and I remember talking to people around me and all of us thinking he'd come out and play 2 or 3 of his hits for the encore. He did not.
He came out and played another song I was unfamiliar with, and had never heard before, and then busted into another guitar solo ... and, not joking ... by the time the song was over, the arena was more than 1/2 empty.
Hopefully, if you're going to see him on this limited tour, he'll play the stuff that he is best known for.
If you read Dr. Scott Atlas's book, "A Plague Upon Our House", he indicates that she was every bit as deep in the Covid cover-up as Fauci was when it came to being honest with the public.
He recounts that while he was on the task force, they would decide on a course of action and before they could implement that action, Birx would hold her own press conference and refute all of the agreed upon findings that she had committed to during the task force meetings.
Atlas also indicated that she had the ear of Pence (who led the task force) more than any other person in the room, including Fauci.
She slunk away after getting busted violating her own guidelines, but in doing so, she managed to duck a vast amount scrutiny that should have gone her direction. She's a snake.
He recounts that while he was on the task force, they would decide on a course of action and before they could implement that action, Birx would hold her own press conference and refute all of the agreed upon findings that she had committed to during the task force meetings.
Atlas also indicated that she had the ear of Pence (who led the task force) more than any other person in the room, including Fauci.
She slunk away after getting busted violating her own guidelines, but in doing so, she managed to duck a vast amount scrutiny that should have gone her direction. She's a snake.
I'm growing frustrated by the media's willingness to mock Harris for what they think is gibberish/word-salad, when, in fact, they should be listening to what she's saying. She might not sound like she's answering questions, but she is, and her answers are structured in a manner to distract from actual analysis. (Maybe on purpose, or maybe because she's just dumb, I don't know, and I don't really care).
Her repeated use of the word "holistic" in response to Stepanie Ruhle's question about "how does the federal government assist in creating affordable housing?" is being laughed at, but what she actually SAID is entirely consistent with the liberal's plan to drastically change the make-up and voting patterns of largely Republican leaning suburbs throughout the United States. You can mock her answer all you want, but to do so is to grossly miss the bigger picture.
Here's what she actually said:
Her goal is to create 3 million housing "units" (notice, not HOMES) within her first term. To do so, she will use "transit dollars" to work with local communities as a "connection" to housing. Through "planning", it is her goal to "prioritize affordable housing". That is her "holistic" plan, and she said it VERY clearly, if you were listening.
This is the liberal's plan, and it has been discussed repeatedly on podcasts that I've listened to for at least the last 2 years (including twice on Tucker Carlson's show). Their plan, if they continue to stay in control, is to tie federal transportation funds to changes in local zoning regulations ("planning") so that largely red leaning suburbs are FORCED to re-zone to allow low-income, multi-unit, developments within the areas that are now largely single-family homes. That is why she said "units" and not homes! Transportation dollars (state and local highway, and other related funds) are the levers that will be used by the federal government (liberals) to extort these local planning/zoning changes.
Her answer laid all of that out. All of it. But the people that should be calling it out for what it is are too busy giggling at her use of the word "holistically" and missing the much bigger picture.
Her repeated use of the word "holistic" in response to Stepanie Ruhle's question about "how does the federal government assist in creating affordable housing?" is being laughed at, but what she actually SAID is entirely consistent with the liberal's plan to drastically change the make-up and voting patterns of largely Republican leaning suburbs throughout the United States. You can mock her answer all you want, but to do so is to grossly miss the bigger picture.
Here's what she actually said:
Her goal is to create 3 million housing "units" (notice, not HOMES) within her first term. To do so, she will use "transit dollars" to work with local communities as a "connection" to housing. Through "planning", it is her goal to "prioritize affordable housing". That is her "holistic" plan, and she said it VERY clearly, if you were listening.
This is the liberal's plan, and it has been discussed repeatedly on podcasts that I've listened to for at least the last 2 years (including twice on Tucker Carlson's show). Their plan, if they continue to stay in control, is to tie federal transportation funds to changes in local zoning regulations ("planning") so that largely red leaning suburbs are FORCED to re-zone to allow low-income, multi-unit, developments within the areas that are now largely single-family homes. That is why she said "units" and not homes! Transportation dollars (state and local highway, and other related funds) are the levers that will be used by the federal government (liberals) to extort these local planning/zoning changes.
Her answer laid all of that out. All of it. But the people that should be calling it out for what it is are too busy giggling at her use of the word "holistically" and missing the much bigger picture.
My dad passed away 19.5 years ago.
On the day of his passing, he been at my house holding his newborn grand-daughter, (who was 5 months old at the time) then he went home, had a heart attack, and was gone. He was 63. Came out of nowhere.
I struggled with grief for several months before a friend of mine gave me some good advice that he had been told when his father passed away. He told me, "you'll never get OVER the grief, but you'll learn how to live with it".
I took that to heart and tried to learn how to live with it. Now, I look forward to the times when I am reminded of him during the day. I look at those memories less as grief, and more as reminders of how fortunate I was to have him in my life and as a reminder of where I come from.
When I started to embrace those feelings of loss, as opposed to suppressing them, it helped me view them as positives and less as negatives.
I feel his loss every day, but I use those feelings to give me a boost and to reinforce my feelings of thankfulness for having had him in my life.
On the day of his passing, he been at my house holding his newborn grand-daughter, (who was 5 months old at the time) then he went home, had a heart attack, and was gone. He was 63. Came out of nowhere.
I struggled with grief for several months before a friend of mine gave me some good advice that he had been told when his father passed away. He told me, "you'll never get OVER the grief, but you'll learn how to live with it".
I took that to heart and tried to learn how to live with it. Now, I look forward to the times when I am reminded of him during the day. I look at those memories less as grief, and more as reminders of how fortunate I was to have him in my life and as a reminder of where I come from.
When I started to embrace those feelings of loss, as opposed to suppressing them, it helped me view them as positives and less as negatives.
I feel his loss every day, but I use those feelings to give me a boost and to reinforce my feelings of thankfulness for having had him in my life.
Axl Rose: Played poker with him at the Palms Casino in Vegas not long after the Palms opened and was sorta the cool place to be. He was a very small guy, but the two security guys that stood behind him while he played were not. He was already playing when I sat down, and he left about 30 minutes later with about $300 in chips. I didn't watch him play long enough to figure out if he was good or not, but he was quiet and I don't recall him speaking at all. The best part was that I was so distracted by sitting next to him, that it took me about 3 rotations to figure out that Huck Seed (former World Series of Poker Champion) was sitting at the other end of the table.
James Brown: Played blackjack with him at the Sahara in the mid-90's. He was unmistakable, and he had 3 security guys with him. He was a complete zombie. Most of the time I couldn't even tell if he was awake, as his dark shades obscured his eyes.
Rob Zombie: Played blackjack with him at the Hard Rock, probably around 2010 or so. Also an unmistakable look and I was sitting right next to him. He was a nice guy and seemed to enjoy the banter of the table. I'm not sure that anyone else in the casino realized it was him. He had no security that I could see, and he too is a small guy.
Michael Jackson: This was in the late 90's and right after the Luxor had opened either the Titanic Exhibit or King Tut stuff (I don't remember which one). My flight got in early and I arrived at the casino at about 8:30am. As my cab is pulling up, there is a large entourage approaching the area for cabs/limo pick-up from the casino. My cabby stopped short, to let the large group go in front of us at the same time as the large group moved to go behind us, putting the large group about 10 feet from the door of the cab as I got out. I opened the door, got out, and was standing face to face with Michael Jackson. It was surreal. He had come to the casino in the morning to see the exhibit before the public was around and he was just leaving as I pulled in. I didn't have any real interaction with him though.
James Brown: Played blackjack with him at the Sahara in the mid-90's. He was unmistakable, and he had 3 security guys with him. He was a complete zombie. Most of the time I couldn't even tell if he was awake, as his dark shades obscured his eyes.
Rob Zombie: Played blackjack with him at the Hard Rock, probably around 2010 or so. Also an unmistakable look and I was sitting right next to him. He was a nice guy and seemed to enjoy the banter of the table. I'm not sure that anyone else in the casino realized it was him. He had no security that I could see, and he too is a small guy.
Michael Jackson: This was in the late 90's and right after the Luxor had opened either the Titanic Exhibit or King Tut stuff (I don't remember which one). My flight got in early and I arrived at the casino at about 8:30am. As my cab is pulling up, there is a large entourage approaching the area for cabs/limo pick-up from the casino. My cabby stopped short, to let the large group go in front of us at the same time as the large group moved to go behind us, putting the large group about 10 feet from the door of the cab as I got out. I opened the door, got out, and was standing face to face with Michael Jackson. It was surreal. He had come to the casino in the morning to see the exhibit before the public was around and he was just leaving as I pulled in. I didn't have any real interaction with him though.
re: Ruby Ridge Standoff began today in 1992
Posted by Scott68 on 8/21/24 at 4:34 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
I was in my 2nd year of law school at Gonzaga (Spokane) at the time and my best friend and I drove to Ruby Ridge and hung out at the scene while the feds kept everything on lock down.
We were there the day before Bo Gritz showed up and helped negotiate the surrender.
One of the most surreal experiences of my life and even though going there with my friend was more of a "let's go see what we can find" stupid move, I'm really glad I went, because looking back on that experience, it really set the tone for so many things that came later.
We were there the day before Bo Gritz showed up and helped negotiate the surrender.
One of the most surreal experiences of my life and even though going there with my friend was more of a "let's go see what we can find" stupid move, I'm really glad I went, because looking back on that experience, it really set the tone for so many things that came later.
re: The fact that David Ortiz is in the baseball HOF but A-Rod is not is disgraceful.
Posted by Scott68 on 8/6/24 at 4:03 am to ChestRockwell
And both Arod and Ortiz came up in the Mariner's farm system at roughly the same time.
Ortiz was known as David Arias when he was with the Mariners.
Ortiz was known as David Arias when he was with the Mariners.
re: Trump survives assassination attempt
Posted by Scott68 on 7/15/24 at 4:16 am to PaperTiger
Video from Podium Perspective
Watching this video (at the 1:20 mark and 1:35 mark, approximately), it is clear that there is a combine (farm machinery) that is parked next to the bleachers on the same side of the podium from where the shooter was posted. There is a very narrow window between the rear of the combine and the bleachers through which the shooter shot.
While subject to the perspective of the person filming the video, it appears as though, that had the combine been parked about 10 feet further back, the shooting lane would have been completely obstructed and Trump couldn't have been seen by the shooter.
That combine is parked there for a reason. Was it mistakenly parked out of position, thereby opening the shooting lane? If it's intended purpose was to obstruct the view from the roof of the building from which the shooter shot, it makes more sense as to why the secret service didn't take more precautions to clear that building. I'd love to know who parked that machinery there.
Watching this video (at the 1:20 mark and 1:35 mark, approximately), it is clear that there is a combine (farm machinery) that is parked next to the bleachers on the same side of the podium from where the shooter was posted. There is a very narrow window between the rear of the combine and the bleachers through which the shooter shot.
While subject to the perspective of the person filming the video, it appears as though, that had the combine been parked about 10 feet further back, the shooting lane would have been completely obstructed and Trump couldn't have been seen by the shooter.
That combine is parked there for a reason. Was it mistakenly parked out of position, thereby opening the shooting lane? If it's intended purpose was to obstruct the view from the roof of the building from which the shooter shot, it makes more sense as to why the secret service didn't take more precautions to clear that building. I'd love to know who parked that machinery there.
Popular
15












