- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/4/19 at 4:59 pm to bmy
quote:
allegations*
Allegations, when vague and general, can lead to an investigation if the alleged wrong doing warrants it.
In Trumps case, there is a single transcribed phone call that shows the alleged "crime" to be bogus and in need of a specialized and not apparent reading of the transcript in order to advance to an investigation.
Just my opinion...others may feel differently.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:00 pm to cajunangelle
Too bad the brain dead idiots of San Fran that elected her won't have a change of opinion bc of her shite.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:03 pm to Dale51
quote:
In Trumps case, there is a single transcribed phone call that shows the alleged "crime" to be bogus and in need of a specialized and not apparent reading of the transcript in order to advance to an investigation.
Just my opinion...others may feel differently.
Whistleblower complaint alleges that Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a [future] meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
The WB obviously hit the nail on the head as far as facts go. The only thing left to debate is whether or not Trump was abusing his power or not.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 5:22 pm to bmy
quote:
bmy
I just flushed a rather large turd down the toilet that I’m quite certain has more brains than you if you think it’s “debatable” Trump abused his power in any way. It’s not debatable because the notion Trump did anything remotely wrong is laughable. It’s not abuse of power when the President asks a foreign government to help investigate legitimate corruption irregardless of the fact that person just happens to be one of many people running for the Democrat nomination.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:06 pm to cajunangelle
Nancy says I'm going senile, I'm yeasty, my son is sorta in Ukraine storylines, my dentures are sliding around, I'm pushing 80, our 2020 candidates are drawing dead, and my boss AOC is on my @ss..
I don't have time to wait!
I don't have time to wait!
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:38 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I just flushed a rather large turd down the toilet that I’m quite certain has more brains than you if you think it’s “debatable” Trump abused his power in any way. It’s not debatable because the notion Trump did anything remotely wrong is laughable. It’s not abuse of power when the President asks a foreign government to help investigate legitimate corruption irregardless of the fact that person just happens to be one of many people running for the Democrat nomination.
but doing so because he is running for the democrat nomination is the definition of corruption
that's the entire thing here.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:45 pm to bmy
If Trump wanted to hurt Biden politically why wouldn't he wait until Biden won the nomination? It's silly.
Posted on 10/4/19 at 6:47 pm to bmy
quote:
but doing so because he is running for the democrat nomination is the definition of corruption
Well then you should not have any problem. It’s not because Biden is a democrat, its because he was likely involved in major corruption scandals of the previous admin.
Pelosi, sanders, whoever else does not have these investigations, they are dems. If it was because of dem nominee *theres like 20ish* then that is a super weird pattern of only investigating 1 for their corruption.
This post was edited on 10/4/19 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 10/4/19 at 7:59 pm to bmy
quote:
but doing so because he is running for the democrat nomination is the definition of corruption
that's the entire thing here.
So, the fact that Biden was or is a potential candidate for the socialist democrat nomination for president, precludes the sitting president from calling for investigations into potential criminal activity? Is that really what you are saying?
Posted on 10/5/19 at 1:28 pm to GeauxTrain
quote:
If Trump wanted to hurt Biden politically why wouldn't he wait until Biden won the nomination? It's silly.
Perhaps his internal polls show he has much more favorable numbers against Warren?
Posted on 10/5/19 at 1:45 pm to bmy
quote:
Perhaps his internal polls show he has much more favorable numbers against Warren?
Or, perhaps he wants to go after corrupt politicians and those who surround them, regardless of politics.
Posted on 10/5/19 at 2:01 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:I get you and the other Darth mixed-up. His avi always gives him away and his turd would definitely be the shape of a certain letter of the alphabet.
I just flushed a rather large turd down the toilet that I’m quite certain has more brains than you if you think it’s “debatable” Trump abused his power in any way
Posted on 10/5/19 at 2:03 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
“The existing rules of the House provide House Committees with full authority to conduct investigations for all matters under their jurisdiction, including impeachment investigations,” she wrote.
In other words, these aren't impeachment proceedings.
Posted on 10/5/19 at 2:08 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
In other words, these aren't impeachment proceedings.
Not official/legitimate. Which, as I understand it, if they were would open up judicial recognition of broader and more binding authority of Congress in the way of subpoena power. As of now Congress is unable to utilize that enhancement. Sorry Congress, you'll have to do better.
Posted on 10/5/19 at 4:13 pm to bmy
quote:
but doing so because he is running for the democrat nomination is the definition of corruption
Leftist radicals seem to believe that political candidates like Biden are immune to investigation? Is that because he is a DemonRat or is it because they want to shut down the investigation into Crowdstrike and the DNC server? (The information on that server would probably be enough to mandate a massive expansion of Guantanamo to hold all of the leftist criminals. ) They seem to imply that being a candidate makes Biden and his family eligible to rob banks and accept HUGE bribes without legal recourse. NOT SO!
Posted on 10/5/19 at 5:47 pm to bmy
quote:
but doing so because he is running for the democrat nomination is the definition of corruption that's the entire thing here.
And the evidence of this is what?
Posted on 10/5/19 at 5:54 pm to bmy
Well then the “entire thing” is bullshite and nobody should give them anything until they vote
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:33 am to troyt37
quote:
Or, perhaps he wants to go after corrupt politicians and those who surround them, regardless of politics.
Then why does he keep hiring them?
Posted on 10/6/19 at 11:47 am to bmy
quote:
Then why does he keep hiring them?
Well, sometimes it’s not easy to tell whether you’re hiring a patriot, or a socialist democrat. You sacks of shite make a living out of being shifty like that.
Now are you going to answer my question? Does being a potential candidate preclude the sitting president from calling for an investigation of potential corruption?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News