- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi & Democrats Unanimously reject a motion condemning Illegal Immigrant Voting
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:04 am to TigerMyth36
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:04 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
So the real election tampering is now in full view of everyone.
And if the fed gov tries to look deeper into the voter registry of some of the more liberal states...the fed gov gets struck down by a hundred different activist judges in order to protect the right of those states, to have illegals illegally vote.
0
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:05 am to ShortyRob
quote:No, Shorty, I SAID that I had no reason to disbelieve DiPrima’s account of Professor Kelly’s opinion, just because DiPrima is a liberal .... especially given that the account was consistent with observation of Trump and the opinions of others who have interacted with Trump. Tillerson jumps to mind.
You spoke for the guy's credibility and admitted to having read a fair amount of his other stuff(all of which is unhinged lefty shite)
I did admit that I later went back and read other op-eds from DiPrima and acknowledged that he is quite liberal.
NONE of which is relevant to the question at hand ... at what level should we make decisions about who is included in the electorate for a given position/office.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:11 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You spoke for the guy's credibility and admitted to having read a fair amount of his other stuff(all of which is unhinged lefty shite)
No, Shorty, I SAID that I had no reason to disbelieve DiPrima’s account of Professor Kelly’s opinion, just because DiPrima is a liberal
Um, you said
quote:
DiPrima is a very bright guy who dislikes Trump intensely. The denizens of this forum just assume that he would fabricate a statement by a now-deceased, dear friend about Trump. I do not make that jump.
This indicates that you were familiar enough with DiPrima to speak for his intelligence hence.........your whole, "I went back and read other shite by him later" lie is......well......an OBVIOUS lie.
Nice Try.
Personally, if I were you and planned to KEEP lying about this, I'd go back and delete my posts at least.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
HYPOTHETICAL.
South Africa implodes. 100,000 Right-leaning Boers move to an important swing state and start farming. The citizens of that state hold a referendum and give them the franchise in state and local elections.
Will we see the same level of whining as we see in response to San Francisco allowing non-citizens to vote in school board elections?
If the answer is yes, you are principled. If the answer is no, you are a blind partisan.
South Africa implodes. 100,000 Right-leaning Boers move to an important swing state and start farming. The citizens of that state hold a referendum and give them the franchise in state and local elections.
Will we see the same level of whining as we see in response to San Francisco allowing non-citizens to vote in school board elections?
If the answer is yes, you are principled. If the answer is no, you are a blind partisan.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
while your "concept" is interesting, there appears to be so much wrong with that.
Would love for my state to outlaw voting locally for all but property owners.
Would love for my state to outlaw voting locally for all but property owners.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
NONE of which is relevant to the question at hand ... at what level should we make decisions about who is included in the electorate for a given position/office.
The relevance is the fact that you're reasons for being in the thread are because you are a DailyKos liberal who, like others before you, comes on to boards masquerading as some middle of the road "voice of reason" so you can steer threads in what you THINK is a less obvious manner.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:13 am to ShortyRob
quote:Why? They are entirely consistent. The fact that you cannot see that says far more about you than me.
Personally, if I were you and planned to KEEP lying about this, I'd go back and delete my posts at least.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:16 am to AggieHank86
Were they brought here by the US government and given a legal status or did they swim across the Atlantic, set up shop in Colorado, and begin farming 100,000 farmers' worth of land in the dead of night?
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 10:17 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:17 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Why? They are entirely consistent. The fact that you cannot see that says far more about you than me.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:17 am to dafif
quote:Go one step further.
Would love for my state to outlaw voting locally for all but property owners.
Large property owners have a larger investment/stake in the local jurisdiction than small property owners. Should my family’s ownership of 3000 acres of prime ranch land give us 100x the voting stake of the family that owns a modest home in town?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:18 am to GRTiger
quote:That would indeed be the next question, but you did not answer the first one .. not that I expected you to do so.
Were they brought here by the US government and given a legal status or did they swim across the Atlantic, set up shop in Colorado, and begin farming 100,000 farmers' worth of land in the dead of night?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
That would indeed be the next question, but you did not answer the first one .. not that I expected you to do so.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:19 am to AggieHank86
EDIT
See follow on post due to prior mis-reading
See follow on post due to prior mis-reading
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:19 am to cajunangelle
I know several ranchers along the border when it comes to illegals trashing their ranches it is shoot, shovel and silence.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:. . . asked and answered . . . several times.
... at what level should we make decisions about who is included in the electorate for a given position/office.
Put in other terms, explicit rights of citizens as voters are infringed whenever a noncitizen votes.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
Ignorance 
You really are a devoted dailykos reader.
You really are a devoted dailykos reader.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:
South Africa implodes. 100,000 Right-leaning Boers move to an important swing state and start farming. The citizens of that state hold a referendum and give them the franchise in state and local elections.
I misread this earlier and didn't realize you meant a US state.
So. To answer. Yeah. This one is easy.
YES, I would fricking oppose it!
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:22 am to ShortyRob
quote:
South Africa implodes. 100,000 Right-leaning Boers move to an important swing state and start farming. The citizens of that state hold a referendum and give them the franchise in state and local elections.
Of course, I assumed that for the sake of honesty, your hypothetical assumes the Boers are NOT here legally and just somehow slipped through the cracks. You wouldn't be trying to slip one thru would ya
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:22 am to AggieHank86
quote:100%
South Africa implodes. 100,000 Right-leaning Boers move to an important swing state and start farming. The citizens of that state hold a referendum and give them the franchise in state and local elections.
Will we see the same level of whining as we see in response to San Francisco allowing non-citizens to vote in school board elections?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:23 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
NC_Tigah
Hank just did what ALL liberals do.
He pulled out the "you're racist" card.......just tried to be slick about it
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News