- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Peak judicial retardation has been achieved! Beware of Nick Sorter
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:48 pm to Speckhunter2012
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:48 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
this is perfectly legit, and this judge has a duty to make this ruling.
It actually is.
I know it's hard to believe for many and it hurts sometimes to hear it but the President cannot do just anything he wants to do.
4
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:49 pm to theballguy
quote:
No, they're an integral part of government to keep Presidents from doing things they're not supposed to and keep legislators from making unconstitutional laws.
No, they are given access at the executives prerogative. There is nothing constitutional that says he cannot remove them from access.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:51 pm to theballguy
quote:
It actually is.
I know it's hard to believe for many and it hurts sometimes to hear it but the President cannot do just anything he wants to do.
Yet judges can? GTFO if it wasn't sacasm.
How bout them apples?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:52 pm to theballguy
The Supreme Court has already ruled on instances like this. So yes, instances like this, he can do what he wants. Sorry, I know it’s hard to believe. Maybe take a Civics class?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:53 pm to Speckhunter2012
No, judges can't do anything they want to either. They can make interpretation rulings however and they may not be what you or the President wants to hear. That's life.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:55 pm to udtiger
Arrest anyone who provides this firm classified information and force this judge to do something about it
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:56 pm to udtiger
Well, there was a reason to revoke the clearance. That reason can now be used to raid that law firm.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:57 pm to theballguy
quote:
I know it's hard to believe for many and it hurts sometimes to hear it but the President cannot do just anything he wants to do.
he can when it comes to security clearances.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:57 pm to theballguy
quote:
Not forcing him to give him one.
Forcing him to not take it away.
The decision didn't address removal of security clearances so those are gone.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:58 pm to theballguy
quote:
but the President cannot do just anything he wants to do
He can when the entirety of the authority and discretion for the decision is vested in him
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:59 pm to udtiger
As a Trump supporter, I am done accepting Nick Sortor's tweets at face value. He fails to do basic research.
The decision has NOTHING to do with security clearances. That was not even challenged.
"At the law firm’s request, the temporary restraining order addresses only three of the order’s six sections, an effort to tackle only the “most immediate” harm at this early stage of litigation.
It does not address Trump’s decision to revoke the lawyers’ security clearances, nor a directive to the chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate “large law firms” for potential Civil Rights Act violations."
The decision has NOTHING to do with security clearances. That was not even challenged.
"At the law firm’s request, the temporary restraining order addresses only three of the order’s six sections, an effort to tackle only the “most immediate” harm at this early stage of litigation.
It does not address Trump’s decision to revoke the lawyers’ security clearances, nor a directive to the chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate “large law firms” for potential Civil Rights Act violations."
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:59 pm to Hennigan
quote:
needs a reset.
Only Congress can do that.
And Congress hasn’t done its job in several generations now. So want to guess how this will go?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:59 pm to Champagne
quote:
The Lawfare against Trump
sfp is like…..
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:01 pm to udtiger
Fuk it, let’s get to the inevitable conclusion.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:02 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
quote:
needs a reset.
Only Congress can do that.
And Congress hasn’t done its job in several generations now. So want to guess how this will go?
I know how I'd wish it to go. How it will go...probably whatever is worst for the people.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:04 pm to Hennigan
quote:
How it will go
Congress will do nothing and we’ll continue to oscillate between nationwide district court rulings
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
As a Trump supporter, I am done accepting Nick Sortor's tweets at face value. He fails to do basic research.
The decision has NOTHING to do with security clearances. That was not even challenged.
"At the law firm’s request, the temporary restraining order addresses only three of the order’s six sections, an effort to tackle only the “most immediate” harm at this early stage of litigation.
It does not address Trump’s decision to revoke the lawyers’ security clearances, nor a directive to the chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate “large law firms” for potential Civil Rights Act violations."
Yeah, but look at the two pages of rage it’s stirred up. That’s the point. Flood the zone with shite.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Most people don’t have any understanding of what court decisions are based on.
They see the political result of the litigation and presume that’s what the court was considering
That is almost never the case.
They see the political result of the litigation and presume that’s what the court was considering
That is almost never the case.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:07 pm to udtiger
Where were the conservative judges to block everything Biden did?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:08 pm to theballguy
quote:
Not forcing him to give him one. Forcing him to not take it away. It's clear many of you never took a civics class
Good Lord
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News