- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Panama Has Taken Back Control Over Both Entrances to the Panama Canal - Cancelled Chinese
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
i literally started a thread showing panama painting over chinese signage and got laughed off the board; you are seriously telling me i'm pivoting when posters were making comments like roger?
how is that fricking pivoting?? they literally said there was no chinese presence or control.
you can never admit you were wrong on any issue ever
1
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:14 pm to JackieTreehorn
quote:
A Democrat would have probably apologized and for some reason sent China a plane full of money too.
Without a doubt.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is a pivot on the above. If you want to admit you're pivoting now,
quote:
Are you under the impression that China has evern controlled the canal?
fricking slo
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I have already searched for "threat" and "presence" on all 4 pages and found 0 uses of either.
Are you aware that people can use different words to describe the same thing? If you are, then you should know that your methodology is flawed.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:21 pm to Ailsa
frick Jimmy Carter.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:21 pm to CAD703X
quote:
fricking slo
Did you read the argument? You're AKTCHUALLY'ing Rog (incorrectly) and I don't think you realize it.
Rog is pointing out that China doesn't specifically own the canal, a corporation does. You're trying to expand that and it doesn't work.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:22 pm to CAD703X
quote:
i literally started a thread showing panama painting over chinese signage and got laughed off the board
This board? I doubt that.
quote:
you are seriously telling me i'm pivoting when posters were making comments like roger?
You are cherrypicking words and not posting the full context of what Rog was specifically arguing.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:his words..HIS WORDS..are literally "Are you under the impression that China has evern controlled the canal?"
Rog is pointing out that China doesn't specifically own the canal, a corporation does. You're trying to expand that and it doesn't work.
point out where he said "owned". jesus.
eta and you're picking at semantics and driving me off the same cliff.
for you to sit here and act like people on this board weren't laughing and scoffing at the idea that china had a major stake and influence on the canal and trump wanting to take it back was just because he was being petty.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:23 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Are you aware that people can use different words to describe the same thing?
Yeah but those worse also didn't seem to exist.
Nobody disputed China had a presence in Panama, in that thread.
The "threat" language creates a lot more room for pivoting, though, I do admit.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah but those worse also didn't seem to exist.
Nobody disputed China had a presence in Panama, in that thread.
The "threat" language creates a lot more room for pivoting, though, I do admit.
owned
influenced
controlled
presence
come on slo, put the lawyer hat down a second. we're all talking about the same thing; china incursion in panama.
everyone is using different words to say the same thing so you're bouncing from post to post like whack-a-mole trying to be "right" and belittle them
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:27 pm to CAD703X
quote:
HIS WORDS..are literally "Are you under the impression that China has evern controlled the canal?"
Yes, because he's pointing out a corporation, not the government of China, does.
What's factually incorrect about that?
quote:
point out where he said "owned". jesus.
You mean other than these?
quote:
He's playing to the idiotic base.
He's right that China has never owned or operated the canal though.
LINK
quote:quote:
ll Chinese port
Owned by Hutchison.
They have ports all across the globe, this deal included all of them.
quote:
Hutchison's deal with BlackRock included 80 percent ownership of CK Hutchison's portfolio of 43 global ports
LINK
quote:
China does not own the ports.
LINK
quote:
China does not own or control the canal and has no more power than the other port operators along the canal.
Do your own research for once in your life, and come back.
LINK
That is on page 1 alone.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:28 pm to CAD703X
quote:
owned
influenced
controlled
presence
come on slo, put the lawyer hat down a second. we're all talking about the same thing
The interpretive pivot has emerged before Spring
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:29 pm to Rebel
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
is there anything more cringe on the PB than slo posting that friends gif 100x a day?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are being taken to the woodshed.
I’m throwing the towel for you.
You pulling for your hometown cowboys tonight or the tigers?
I’m throwing the towel for you.
You pulling for your hometown cowboys tonight or the tigers?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 5:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Panama is, with great speed, attempting to take down the 64% of signs which are written in Chinese. They are all over the Zone, because China controls the Panama Canal. PANAMA IS NOT GOING TO GET AWAY WITH THIS!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News