- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:18 pm to Dday63
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:18 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
But...Trump had no basis to believe it had been stolen.
Jack and Felicia told us so.
Jack and Felicia told us so.
This post was edited on 10/22/23 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 10/22/23 at 2:19 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
I was laughed at when during election 2020 I stated that the Democrats were on a course that paralleled the rise of Nazism in the 30's.
They will only double down.
They will only double down.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:17 pm to shel311
quote:
Trump filed 20+ lawsuits, claimed to have all the evidence, and each suit was thrown out because he never showed any of the evidence. Some were thrown out by republican appointed judges who also scolded Trump specifically for not presenting evidence he claimed he had.
Why didn't Trump just simply show all the evidence he had?
That's not even close to being accurate. Where did you come up with that garbage?
There were 28 lawsuits filed by Trump, or on his behalf, as a plaintiff, that were decided based on their merits. Trump won 17 of them.
The vast majority of the remaining 60+ were dismissed due to Lack of Standing, followed by laches, jurisdictional issues, moot/timing...
The "Republican appointed judges" reference is just plain ignorant and born of naivety.
If you're that interested/concerned, consider all the evidence that has not made it to a courtroom,
including the myriad of claims "debunked" by the very people accused of the malfeasance & the blatant process violations and/or destruction of evidence.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:17 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Like anything else contrary to the narrative, people will want the actual court docs. Is there a link to them somewhere? Would love to share with some friends.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:31 pm to ronricks
quote:
quote:Trump was not permitted to show evidence in a single suit.
What is this ‘evidence’? Hopefully not from people like Sidney Powell and Rudy Guiliani. They’ve already admitted it wasn’t true. The evidence they had was laughable to begin with.
Can you name any judge in any swing state precinct that was part of the late night Dim ballot dumps who allowed the legal teams challenging the validity of the mail in and drop box ballots an opportunity to scrutinize those ballots?
No you can't because those requests were denied every time, and even the few ballots in the 2022 AZ midterm that Kari Lake's legal team were allowed to view from Maricopa county were selected by the opposition and some of those still had questionable signatures.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:36 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
The more the media say it’s a lie the more I know it’s the truth.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 4:47 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Explain to me what will be different and why my vote matters?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 5:24 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Everybody with a brain knows it!
Posted on 10/22/23 at 5:58 pm to 2020_reVISION
quote:
There were 28 lawsuits filed by Trump, or on his behalf, as a plaintiff, that were decided based on their merits. Trump won 17 of them.
Okay, but 16 of those 17 were filed before the election and has nothing to do with voter fraud.
The GOP had poll watchers keeping an eye on the signature matching. If they saw any serious problems they reported them and there would be no problem getting a Court to allow further review.
I don't know if there was fraud or not. There may have been the massive fraud you all so desperately want to believe in. I hope there was not that level of fraud, not because of Trump, but because I would prefer to know that our elections can be trusted.
What I do know is that no one has presented sufficient evidence to prove fraud if the level being claimed. And you cannot even claim fraud in a Court document without evidence to back that up.
It's a good rule to follow in real life as well.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:03 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
bet most don't know many illegals have SSN assigned to them.
Why?
So they can "vote"
How does a SSN enable someone to vote?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:11 pm to Dday63
quote:
The GOP had poll watchers keeping an eye on the signature matching. If they saw any serious problems they reported them and there would be no problem getting a Court to allow further review.
Have you been under a rock?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:12 pm to Dday63
quote:
How does a SSN enable someone to vote?
You can't be serious.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:14 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
ZERO proof ever posted, but they always have numbers of votes.
if you have the goods, fricking post it
if you have the goods, fricking post it
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:18 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Kraken?
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:19 pm to shel311
quote:
Trump filed 20+ lawsuits, claimed to have all the evidence, and each suit was thrown out because he never showed any of the evidence. Some were thrown out by republican appointed judges who also scolded Trump specifically for not presenting evidence he claimed he had.
Why didn't Trump just simply show all the evidence he had?
quote:
Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence. Many court cases are decided based on evidence from affidavits alone. If affidavits aren’t considered evidence, then millions of court judgments going back many years in this country must be thrown out.
https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2020/11/30/hey-msm-affidavits-are-considered-evidence-n2580794
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:26 pm to YouKnowImRight
There are tons of evidence.
https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2020/11/30/hey-msm-affidavits-are-considered-evidence-n2580794
quote:
Powell and the Trump legal team have compiled hundreds, if not thousands, of affidavits from people swearing to election fraud in the presidential election. Affidavits are evidence. Many court cases are decided based on evidence from affidavits alone. If affidavits aren’t considered evidence, then millions of court judgments going back many years in this country must be thrown out.
https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2020/11/30/hey-msm-affidavits-are-considered-evidence-n2580794
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:30 pm to loogaroo
quote:
quote:
The GOP had poll watchers keeping an eye on the signature matching. If they saw any serious problems they reported them and there would be no problem getting a Court to allow further review.
Have you been under a rock?
Prolonged licking of a CNN screen has serious side effects.
Posted on 10/22/23 at 6:33 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
This is not GA, but AZ. However, it does illustrate the depth of fraud going on.
quote:
Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent
quote:
They found most AZ residents are horrified that a stranger or strangers have registered to vote using their home address. Several homeowners received multiple ballots (3, 4, 5), with one who received 20 ballots at their home. One business address received 200 ballots and another AZ address is used by 2,012 people who registered to vote. Within the first few days the Citizens Investigation had a couple hundred affidavits that 2020 votes were not associated with their registered address. Among other things, Piton found one corner lot has 1,500 registered voters and the lot next to it has 1,000. It’s beyond suspicious that 2,500 voters are registered to such a small area of land.
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News