- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/18/26 at 12:28 pm to AlterEd
British men are soft as puppy shite for allowing this and not cleansing their country.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:02 pm to Auburn1968
That should include influencers like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. They ain't saying shite about this. Despite both of them owing a lot of their current fame to "exposing" the sex abuse culture in our world today.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:08 pm to AlterEd
quote:It should ... and it does.
That should include influencers like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson.
Tucker has no credibility. There is something wrong with him.
Candace Owen never did.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 4:18 pm to AlterEd
It's happening here too.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:07 pm to AlterEd
Go try searching for information on this newly-released report. ZERO mention at the NYT or CNN. It's actually hard to find decent coverage.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:09 pm to Big Scrub TX
Visibility is going to be a problem with the major flaws I posted about. That's why pointing these flaws out is so important for an intelligent, rational conversation to be had. You can't do that with made up numbers used for shock value being so crucial to the narrative.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This thread is long. I didn't see what you said - what was it?
Visibility is going to be a problem with the major flaws I posted about. That's why pointing these flaws out is so important for an intelligent, rational conversation to be had. You can't do that with made up numbers used for shock value being so crucial to the narrative.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:12 pm to Big Scrub TX
The huge numbers used have no support. The report cites a single quote from a transcript that offered no legitimate support for the numbers. This report goes off the rails of rationality at literally footnote 1.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Please prove that 250,000 girls weren’t raped
Why are you putting burden on Rupert Lowe?
Why are you putting burden on Rupert Lowe?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Please prove that 250,000 girls weren’t raped
Do you have a basic understanding of logic?
It's logically impossible to prove a negative. The fact that you think that you asked a good question. There shows you're not really capable of having this discussion.
quote:
Why are you putting burden on Rupert Lowe?
He made the claim. It's his burden and responsibility to support it.
I don't have a burden to prove him wrong. I cannot logically prove him wrong. I'm not even saying that he is wrong. I said his argument has no support.
That's how arguments work
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
The claim is this has been going on since 1955. That is over 25,000 days.
Do you really think an average of 10 per day is impossible?
Seriously, frick you.
Tell us the number of rapes per day that you would find acceptible.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 5:59 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
The claim is this has been going on since 1955. That is over 25,000 days.
Do you really think an average of 10 per day is impossible?
That has nothing to do with my point.
quote:
Tell us the number of rapes per day that you would find acceptible.
Dishonest pivot
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:03 pm to GRTiger
They're displaying the exact emotional-irrational response desired by the fantastical claims.
They try to steer every conversation to the pre-prepared points, no matter how relevant or silly the behavior is.
THAT is also not going to help a rational, intelligent discussion.
If I used January 6 as a basis to extrapolate "right wing violence in America" (which would be the same extrapolation "methodology" to get to this number), I bet they would want to know how we got to THAT result and would scrutinize the methodology.
They try to steer every conversation to the pre-prepared points, no matter how relevant or silly the behavior is.
THAT is also not going to help a rational, intelligent discussion.
If I used January 6 as a basis to extrapolate "right wing violence in America" (which would be the same extrapolation "methodology" to get to this number), I bet they would want to know how we got to THAT result and would scrutinize the methodology.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm not reading all that. I know what you're doing. I will just never know why.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:05 pm to GRTiger
You can tell how seriously egregious a topic is by the quickness with which this dipshit runs into a thread to discredit it and how long he will stay in the thread saying the same shite over and over. He's like the internet version of Goebbels.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:26 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You can tell how seriously egregious a topic is by the quickness with which this dipshit runs into a thread to discredit it and how long he will stay in the thread saying the same shite over and over. He's like the internet version of Goebbels.
You don't know what footnotes are
Back to top


0









