Started By
Message

re: Oh No Vaxx Bros! They're saying we're infectious!

Posted on 9/21/21 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21243 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

This “vaccine” needs to be rebranded as a Covid shot, similar to how the flu vaccine is commonly referred to as the flu shot.


The problem is the "Covid Shot" is actually pretty dangerous to a lot of people. I have not heard of the flu shot killing people, but maybe it has.
Posted by Gumbaw
Member since May 2018
560 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

The only thing the vaccines do is lessen symptoms and improve outcomes, but that’s a pretty big deal.



Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

quote:

But that ignores the fact that the vaccinated are less likely to have a breakthrough case then an unvaccinated (without natural immunity)


Great, can I get my unvaccinated with immunity card please?


Absolutely a good idea. Might need a doctor's sign off to tap down forgeries and quality control.

Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

The only thing the vaccines do is lessen symptoms and improve outcomes, but that’s a pretty big deal.


It is, but it shoots down the positions that:

1.) Only unvaccinated should be tested regularly. Either both get tested, or neither, but it shouldn't be just the unvaxxed.

2.) Unvaxxed are a hazard to the vaccinated and should be prohibited from flying, attending concerts, going to restaurants, or whatever else the NYC ban is prohibiting.
Posted by ChapelHillSooner
Chapel Hill
Member since Dec 2020
593 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

This has been known for months.

The only thing the vaccines do is lessen symptoms and improve outcomes, but that’s a pretty big deal.


Not true. They also make if far more likely that you won't have a breakthrough infection to begin with.

By only measuring viral loads of breakthrough infections, we are selecting a small subset of vaccinated people.

When most vaccinated people encounter the virus, their body fights it off and they are not even considered in the breakthrough category.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

But that ignores the fact that the vaccinated are less likely to have a breakthrough case then an unvaccinated (without natural immunity) person is to be infected.



Proof?

How will we know if vaccinated are less likely to get it if we are only testing the unvaxxed? Like Biden's mandate says: If you're vaxxed, you don't have to do anything. If you're unvaxxed, you have to be tested every week. Of course the number of unvaxxed cases are higher.

Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

The problem is the "Covid Shot" is actually pretty dangerous to a lot of people. I have not heard of the flu shot killing people, but maybe it has.


Well heck if zerohedge told you it was dangerous...

Most responses are mild (like any vaccine).

CDC deaths are extremely rare

quote:

Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. More than 386 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through September 20, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 7,899 reports of death (0.0020%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths pdf icon[1.4 MB, 40 pages].


Here is the PDF mentioned above about TTS

Basically there have been 28 cases of TTS linked to COVID vaccine (all J&J). Three have resulted in death.

Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Proof?

How will we know if vaccinated are less likely to get it if we are only testing the unvaxxed? Like Biden's mandate says: If you're vaxxed, you don't have to do anything. If you're unvaxxed, you have to be tested every week. Of course the number of unvaxxed cases are higher.


The studies are not looking at gross numbers (that might be affected by an increase monitoring via testing mandates) but trial and tracking data.

CDC

quote:

Studies so far show that vaccinated people are 8 times less likely to be infected and 25 times less likely to experience hospitalization or death. Vaccines remain effective in protecting most people from COVID-19 infection and its complications.
Posted by ChapelHillSooner
Chapel Hill
Member since Dec 2020
593 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

The problem is the "Covid Shot" is actually pretty dangerous to a lot of people. I have not heard of the flu shot killing people, but maybe it has.


Yes, people do die of the flu shot. It is rare but almost all vaccines carry a small risk.

My uncle had Guillain Barre after receiving the flu shot. He is convinced it was caused by the flu shot. I think it may have been but it may have been caused by any sort of infection. (Anything that triggers your immune system can cause Guillain Barre as GB happens when your immune system overreacts and attacks your nerves.)

My uncle lived but my dad also developed Guillain Barre a couple of years later and did not live through it. His was not caused by any vaccination but instead was a consequence of sepsis.

For the record, in his family three people have had Guillain Barre, two of whom died. Despite a clear genetic or environmental risk that may share with them, I didn't hesitate to get the COVID shot.

Posted by ChapelHillSooner
Chapel Hill
Member since Dec 2020
593 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Well heck if zerohedge told you it was dangerous...

Most responses are mild (like any vaccine).

CDC deaths are extremely rare


Yup, and the VAERS data gets misinterpreted, either intentionally or unintentionally.

People are quick to point to the almost 8k deaths but ignore the fact that we were vaccinating tens of millions of elderly people and hundreds of millions of others.

It would be really odd to not have several thousands of incidents of strokes, heart attacks, etc. following vaccinations considering the sheer number of people being vaccinated.

To not have any of these events, it would be like taking half the U.S. population and watching them for two weeks and having no deaths due to heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, etc.

You can't look at the VAERS data by itself and come to any conclusion. You have to take a statistical look at it. Are any of these causes of death more prevalent after vaccination than in the population at large.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41906 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

The only thing the vaccines do is lessen symptoms and improve outcomes, but that’s a pretty big deal.


"Get the flu shot but it doesn't guarantee you won't get flu."

This vaxx is BS and sensationalism. If YOU want it, get it but don't force it on others.

Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

quote:
Studies so far show that vaccinated people are 8 times less likely to be infected and 25 times less likely to experience hospitalization or death. Vaccines remain effective in protecting most people from COVID-19 infection and its complications.



Is this the same CDC that until recently was saying that a vaccinated person that had a breakthrough case was less likely to infect another person?

Using CDC numbers, that a vaccinated person is 25 times less likely to die than an unvaccinated person, we can conclude that an unvaccinated person is very unlikely to die from Covid - less likely than with the flu.

Per the CDC, 99.74% of unvaccinated people recover. If the vaccinated are 25x less likely to die, that means the unvaccinated have about a 99.99% chance of surviving, regardless of whether they got it from a vaccinated or unvaccinated person. 99.74 for unvaccinated vs 99.99 for vaccinated. Correct?

And what if it turns out that there ARE severe long term side effects, like stroke, neurological disease, or any number of life altering/ending conditions? Is that worth mandating the vax?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17989 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

The only thing the vaccines do is lessen symptoms and improve outcomes, but that’s a pretty big deal.


That is a therapeutic not a vaccine.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

That is a therapeutic not a vaccine.



Don't we have therapeutics that work, as shown by many studies, but are being denied to people because of CDC recommendations?
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
2596 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Now this protection from infection has been dropping either because it wanes over time or delta, but it is still much better than not having a vaccination.


How? You’ve essentially become Typhoid Mary for vaxxed & unvaxxed alike. So essentially they’ve openly admitted they’ve spent billions and ruined people’s lives & careers for Oseltamivir…Tamiflu. Antiviral drug
It can treat and prevent flu (influenza).
Pfizer’s MRNA vaccine CANNOT treat nor prevent the spread of COVID-19.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14494 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

And what if it turns out that there ARE severe long term side effects, like stroke, neurological disease, or any number of life altering/ending conditions? Is that worth mandating the vax?


You have never seen me post that I am pro-mandate. I have explicitly stated Biden's proposed mandate is a ridiculous overreach both of federal authority and expanding OSHA laws until they are meaningless.

That does not mean I a pro-made up nonsense either.

Most vaccine threads on here have a pattern:
-OP posts some anti-vax nonsense as fact
-several posters jump on board as it validates their beliefs.
-one or two people point out the flaws in the OP.
-posters then either ignore those flaws or fallback to the "well that still doesn't justify a mandate" position.

I can let a lot of bad arguments slide. But just pushing vaccine nonsense at best makes conservatives look stupid, and at worst could lead someone to make an ill informed decision about their own health.

And there is plenty of reasonable positions to push: better research on immunity of the COVID recovered (I posted in this thread they should get some kind of card like the vaccinated get), more research into various treatments (you have never seen me attack ivermectin for example), etc.

But at least some basic review before people posted would be nice to see before regurgitating whatever people saw on social media.


Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34141 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

This has been downplayed at every opportunity for months.


FIFY
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

But at least some basic review before people posted would be nice to see before regurgitating whatever people saw on social media.



I try to seek the truth. My opinion is jaded by the fact that we are continuously lied to by our own government.

I'm not anti-vax. I am anti-mandate and I want to wait until the wheel stops spinning before I decide. I had Covid, so I will, in all likelihood never get the vaccine, unless it is clearly the best option for me at some point.

If this vaccine turns out to have no long term side effects, then I am more inclined to take an mRNA vaccine for the next virus that comes along. But because of natural immunities, I am sitting this one out, but some people don't want me to have that option...
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162223 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:50 pm to
quote:


Not big enough to mandate on any level though.

Right. At this point the high risk should be the ones seeking vaccination. It's not a matter of transmission but protecting the vulnerable. Unfortunately many people are too dumb to know that they're vulnerable and have chosen to opt out.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 9/21/21 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

And there is plenty of reasonable positions to push: better research on immunity of the COVID recovered (I posted in this thread they should get some kind of card like the vaccinated get), more research into various treatments (you have never seen me attack ivermectin for example), etc.


We should also do more research into how India was able to beat the Delta variant, despite having single digit vaccination rates. There are other countries that are doing far better than us, as well.

If only every suggestion made didn't seem to align with pharmaceutical companies making billions of dollars. They never suggest the obvious, like losing weight, taking a vitamin regimen, or spending time outdoors. Every recommendation by our government for combatting the disease requires paying money to a pharmaceutical company, whether you have Covid-19 or not.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram