- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:04 pm to alphaandomega
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:04 pm to alphaandomega
Seems we can now add Jordan to the IRGC's 'all is fair in love and war' target....about the only areas unscathed are Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon...interesting
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 2:05 pm
0
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:05 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
for absolutely no good reason.
you can't really make statements like this with a straight face if you think killing radical Islamic terrorist with weapon capability they have no business owning is no good reason. You only sleep well at night because our country keeps us safe from world bullshite like that. don't be a hypocrite of keeping your family safe for granted.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:07 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
I guess you’re cool with 2,000+ civilian deaths in a month. That’s on your conscience not mine. Vaya con dios.
It isn't good.
But it sounds better than killing 35,000 Renee Goodes in 2 days.
Is this a competition?
World peace is super easy when both sides want peace.
But reality is a lot more complicated.
15000 bombing strikes and 2000 accidental deaths sounds like very few mistakes were made.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:08 pm to Chad504boy
Has Iran ever had the capability of striking the United States? (Answer is no)
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:09 pm to T1gerNate
I guess your cool with nary a single fricking link
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:09 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Has Iran ever had the capability of striking the United States? (Answer is no)
And it shall always stay that way. Glad we seem to want the same thing.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:11 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Has Iran ever had the capability of striking the United States? (Answer is no)
Yet they find themselves constantly striking against the United States.
Do you have any family that have been hit by roadside IEDs in the past 25 years?
I do.
Have you heard of the USS Cole?
US Embassies?
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:12 pm to meansonny
Thousand killed and maimed by IEDs.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:16 pm to Chad504boy
Lets examine the matter further. It is factually true that Iran did not in January 2026 and has never possessed missile technology capable of striking the United States (i.e. ICBMs). You can look it up and you will find this statement is true.
However, Iran did (and probably still does) possess mid-range ballistic missiles capable of striking Israel. This is also true.
Do you think it is possible that the US engaged in this bombing campaign against Iran - despite it being literally impossible for Iran to strike the USA because Iran does not and has never had an ICBM - to degrade Iran’s capability of attacking Israel? (Yes that is why and it is the only reason we are doing this.)
If so, would you still support it? I suspect the answer is yes so let’s just be honest about it.
However, Iran did (and probably still does) possess mid-range ballistic missiles capable of striking Israel. This is also true.
Do you think it is possible that the US engaged in this bombing campaign against Iran - despite it being literally impossible for Iran to strike the USA because Iran does not and has never had an ICBM - to degrade Iran’s capability of attacking Israel? (Yes that is why and it is the only reason we are doing this.)
If so, would you still support it? I suspect the answer is yes so let’s just be honest about it.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:16 pm to meansonny
I wouldn’t even acknowledge these imbeciles that make these foolish claims.
Hope your family member that was wounded in battle is doing well now.
Hope your family member that was wounded in battle is doing well now.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:16 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
iranians were happy we were wiping out the terrorists organizations in the country.
You think they are happy with us destroying their infrastructure and “bombing them back to the Stone Age”?
The message changed from “free Iran” to “bomb them to the Stone Age where they belong.”
Now when I first saw that, I thought that it was a huge change in the messaging, but then I remembered Trump plays 5D chess. When he said, “free Iran”, he meant freeing them from the bonds of modernity. Most of them may be dead, but the ones that remain can look forward to an almost Edenic experience, with no electricity, running water, etc.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:18 pm to T1gerNate
Your heroes were a threat to the region
There is a reason the GCC countries are more than happy to allow us to use the bases in the region
Why was Iran enrichment program accelerating well last energy requirement?
There is a reason the GCC countries are more than happy to allow us to use the bases in the region
Why was Iran enrichment program accelerating well last energy requirement?
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:22 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Has Iran ever had the capability of striking the United States? (Answer is no)
When wrong -> keep moving goalposts (heck, just change the argument entirely!)
Your parents are ashamed of you, I hope you know
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:26 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Do you think it is possible that the US engaged in this bombing campaign against Iran - despite it being literally impossible for Iran to strike the USA because Iran does not and has never had an ICBM - to degrade Iran’s capability of attacking Israel? (Yes that is why and it is the only reason we are doing this.)
So when Trump said in 1979 that the US should send troops into Iran, he said that to protect Israel?
In the 1980s when he said that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, he was predicting what the Israeli PM would want him to say?
In the 2000s when he blasted US politicians for giving over $7B to the Iranians, he was predicting what the Israeli PM would want him to say?
The sad thing is that you believe yourself.
Michael Malice is correct.
The world is not split between the truth seekers and liars.
It is split between those who only see what helps their argument (ignoring any contradicting evidence despite it being in front of their face dozens of times) because you aren't lying if you only accept facts that fit your narrative. Accepting only your version of reality makes you a more persuasive person, in your head.
Good luck in life, son.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:28 pm to meansonny
Awe he down voted lol.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:31 pm to Jbird
China and Russia must really not like what they’re seeing on the warfront. Their bots and propaganda are full force on the board today. It’s wild.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:36 pm to Aguga
The tech they sold around the world has gotten its collective shite pushed in
The only effective asset that gave had are the drones with a limited explosive capability.
They are all they can hang hats on.
The only effective asset that gave had are the drones with a limited explosive capability.
They are all they can hang hats on.
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:37 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Lets examine the matter further. It is factually true that Iran did not in January 2026 and has never possessed missile technology capable of striking the United States (i.e. ICBMs). You can look it up and you will find this statement is true.
Why did you change your argument from the ability to to strike the USA to the ability to strike with ICBMs?
You realize that a submarine has the ability to move right. You realize when that Americans were killed in Israel during the Oct. 7th attack right?
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:39 pm to T1gerNate
"Has Iran ever had the capability of striking the United States? (Answer is no)"
So we should wait a few months?
So we should wait a few months?
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:44 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Why did you change your argument from the ability to to strike the USA to the ability to strike with ICBMs?
Let me slow down for you because you are apparently retarded. The USA is 10,000 kilometers from Iran. In order for Iran to strike the USA it would need an ICBM. It does not, and has never had an ICBM, nor is there any evidence it was ever even attempting to develop an ICBM. That is not an argument that is a fact. Carry on.
Page 538 of 846
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News