
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/18/26 at 6:45 am to LemmyLives
Well how do you feel our Secretary of War performed during his first war?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:11 am to tigervet4
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:17 am to T1gerNate
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:21 am to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:24 am to BayouBengal51
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. "Misunderstandings"
"Bro we need some GCC cash, sorry about killing some of your people and destroying some of infrastructure by blindly firing missiles in your direction and piloting suicide drones into your airports and civilian buildings."
Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:49 am to T1gerNate
I mean he could've just avoided the whole Iran thing to begin with preventing oil prices from soaring and the stock market from dipping but instead we get a shitty MOU and had to pay $4 a gallon for gas for a couple of months

Posted on 6/18/26 at 7:52 am to LARancher1991
The best time to not go to war with Iran was in March, but the second best time to not go to war with Iran is right now.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:01 am to T1gerNate
a lot of negative repetitive commentary. Maybe time to start a new thread
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:15 am to Trevaylin
Perhaps the negative comments are warranted. Only Trump’s minions will defend this failure.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:26 am to BayouBengal51
quote:
Iranian television reports: The passage of naval vessels through the Strait of Hormuz still needs to be done in coordination and approval of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Fake news there and here are having a word duel. Only time will sort the BS fakery from reality.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:30 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Israel Hayom: In light of President Trump's major shift in attitude towards Iran, Israel is preparing for a period of at least several months during which pressure will be applied on Israel to limit its military activities. Additionally, Israel does not see itself as bound by the agreement Trump signed.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:09 am to ninthward
its like the pole smokers are out in force today
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:27 am to cusoonkpd
quote:
Only Trump’s minions will defend this failure.
Those are few and far between now.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 9:27 am to moontigr
quote:
...but I’m not buying it. This deal sucks, period.
While I do understand your sentiment... the 1st thing you have understand is there is no real "deal" in place. Rather there is simply a negotiated framework/outline from which a future deal is to be negotiated.
I personally am of the opinion that once the bombs start dropping (I have used the exact analogy previously) you have kicked over the hornets nest and now you just have to burn it to ashes. While I do not doubt we have crippled the IRGC and Co, given enough time and money they can recover. So I think its a mistake to negotiate some "deal" now... there has been nothing in their public rhetoric that indicates they have cried "Uncle" ...
Having said all of that... I am in no way interested in any "boots on the ground" type of thing so that severely limits your options. Outside of the general populace taking the reins I do not know what other viable options are available..
Just my opinion..
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:10 am to klrstix
Theres really no other options.
Boots on the ground: trump would lose all support, theres no will for this is the US for iran
Keep bombing: from the looks of it, doesnt seem to work in a good ratio with the costs and available supply. Here we are paying Iran to simply talk to us after dropping 30 billion, while they still seemingly have significant ability to threaten whoever and whatever they want with drones and missiles, that tells you all you have to know about the cost/benefit there.
Keep the blockade in place: I think the you lose the rest of the world, and most importantly for trump, you keep the inflation fire on the rise, which gives a super easy narrative to the left.. Just play clips of trump talking about affordability.
I tend to think the best option is just pack up and leave, trump can do his thing and say they destroyed their navy, army etc, blah blah. Its not a great option, we went in and kicked hornets nest and now just basically back away but we created a mess with no good roads to take. If the rest of the Arab countries dont want to help, then what are we supposed to do? Id put it all on them or other allies that refused to help. It'll be a blemish on the admins rep, but with today's news cycles, everyone will be on to the next thing a week later. Unfortunately, trump has talked this option out of viability.
This option of basically bribing them to "talk" depends entirely on getting some type of nuclear agreement in the next 2 months while they rebuild all their capabilities, or we are back where we started with even more egg on the face of the USA, while Iran sits in a more powerful seat than before all of this started. I must be hopeful, but we created a power vacuum, and we are relying on the word of some radical Islamic extremist which have never kept their word before...
I honestly think it feels so much worse than it actually is because of all the talking trumps done. If this is 4d chess, we need to get the fk up and stop playing.
Boots on the ground: trump would lose all support, theres no will for this is the US for iran
Keep bombing: from the looks of it, doesnt seem to work in a good ratio with the costs and available supply. Here we are paying Iran to simply talk to us after dropping 30 billion, while they still seemingly have significant ability to threaten whoever and whatever they want with drones and missiles, that tells you all you have to know about the cost/benefit there.
Keep the blockade in place: I think the you lose the rest of the world, and most importantly for trump, you keep the inflation fire on the rise, which gives a super easy narrative to the left.. Just play clips of trump talking about affordability.
I tend to think the best option is just pack up and leave, trump can do his thing and say they destroyed their navy, army etc, blah blah. Its not a great option, we went in and kicked hornets nest and now just basically back away but we created a mess with no good roads to take. If the rest of the Arab countries dont want to help, then what are we supposed to do? Id put it all on them or other allies that refused to help. It'll be a blemish on the admins rep, but with today's news cycles, everyone will be on to the next thing a week later. Unfortunately, trump has talked this option out of viability.
This option of basically bribing them to "talk" depends entirely on getting some type of nuclear agreement in the next 2 months while they rebuild all their capabilities, or we are back where we started with even more egg on the face of the USA, while Iran sits in a more powerful seat than before all of this started. I must be hopeful, but we created a power vacuum, and we are relying on the word of some radical Islamic extremist which have never kept their word before...
I honestly think it feels so much worse than it actually is because of all the talking trumps done. If this is 4d chess, we need to get the fk up and stop playing.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 10:22 am
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:22 am to Pendulum
quote:
If the rest of the Arab countries dont want to help, then what are we supposed to do?
This is definitely another part of the equation... It seems rather naive for the Arab world to think (as it seems to be the case..) that they can just ignore the neighborhood idiots and sooner or later they will go away...
quote:
I honestly think it feels so much worse than it actually is because of all the talking trumps done. If this is 4d chess, we need to get the fk up and stop playing.
Good point and I tend to agree with this thought...
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:27 am to Pendulum
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Putting aside the oil waiver/license and no-new sanctions concerns, the more I try to understand what it would take to actually implement Para. 6 ($300B reconstruction fund) and Para. 7 (terminate all sanctions), the more I think U.S. negotiators either knew a final deal was impossible.
This MOU is kicking the can.
Here's what "full implementation" would actually require beyond nuclear concessions:
Para. 6 — $300B fund:
Presidential waiver of IFCA §1245 mandatory sanctions on Iran's construction sector (180-day renewable, Congressional notification required, every cycle)
IRGC FTO delisting, or investors face criminal material support exposurem no general license fixes that
ISA national interest waiver for energy/petroleum investment
Result: no institutional investor commits billions on rolling 6-month waiver cycles.
Para. 7 — Terminate ALL sanctions:
CISADA §104: no presidential waiver authority — mandatory sanctions, requires Congressional repeal
NDAA §1245: 120-day renewable waiver, mandatory Congressional reporting each cycle
§311 PATRIOT Act designation of Iranian financial sector as money laundering concern: separate FinCEN rulemaking, not solved by OFAC
Terrorism + human rights + Russia-overlap designations: each requires independent legal action
All sanctions isn't a switch but a multi-year legislative and regulatory project, and Congress has a vote. How would you get EU to drop Iran's sections under Russia files.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 10:34 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Vance tells New York Times:
There is a strange panic within the Israeli establishment, which I sense, where it is assumed that anything considered and potentially beneficial to Iran will indeed happen, but that it will happen without the Iranians changing any behavior on their part.
Therefore, I find this whole wave of hysteria in Israel somewhat strange, because in my opinion, it stems from a lack of trust.
The US has rightfully earned the trust of this region. We have done a very good job for that "particular country" and its government, and I believe the facts do not support the claim that we made a bad deal, which does not make sense when considering the depth and duration of the parties' relations.

Popular
Back to top


0











