- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:46 am to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:46 am to BayouBengal51
That island up at the top of the Strait would make an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" should we take it. It would be a big loss of face to the IRGC especially if it was known that we wouldn't give it back as long as the regime isn't changed.
The question is how to protect it from drones.
The question is how to protect it from drones.
This post was edited on 6/6/26 at 11:58 am
2
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:50 am to Auburn1968
quote:
The question is how to protect it from drones.
Our military has been talking about lasers for a long time now. I'm not an expert, but it seems like they'd be useful for that, if they work.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 11:53 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
You really got to believe that Iran nuking US soil is credible (it isn't in my opinion) to make that price worth it.
I do believe a dirty bomb would be a credible threat.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:19 pm to Bronco11
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:22 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
During that time they've been continually building their conventional forces, with assistance from China,
You forgot to mention Obama.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 12:23 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
Our military has been talking about lasers for a long time now. I'm not an expert, but it seems like they'd be useful for that, if they work.
There is probably some pimply-faced 15-year old kid living in his momma's basement somewhere in the midwest that could hack into Iran's drone control system and disable them all.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:10 pm to TulsaSooner78
Is that island in artillery range from the mainland of Iran? Or the mountains?
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:50 pm to ItTakesAThief
Yes.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:58 pm to jeffsdad
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:03 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
That island up at the top of the Strait would make an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" should we take it. It would be a big loss of face to the IRGC especially if it was known that we wouldn't give it back as long as the regime isn't changed. The question is how to protect it from drones.
You protect it by putting a large amount of air defenses on it. It’ll basically act as a sponge for most of the drones and missiles that would otherwise be intended for threatening shipping through the strait. Combine that with a large naval presence patrolling the strait we should be able to keep the sea lanes open for commercial traffic. And everytime Iran launches a drone or missile we’d have an opportunity to target its launch point.
It doesn’t appear that the civilians are going to rise up against the regime so this is probably the only way to salvage a “win” from this war.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:31 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
Is that island in artillery range from the mainland of Iran? Or the mountains?
Measured it on Google Earth Pro and it is well within artillery range of the Iran coast. However, American artillery would have a big advantage with Himars and Excalibur either one of which can put a shell down a chimney 40 miles away.
Drones are the concern as that's in drone range too.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:51 pm to Auburn1968
What would we gain from taking an island that is doing nothing and putting people in harms way to keep a presence there.
We can stop their oil tankers in the ocean already.
We can stop their oil tankers in the ocean already.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 2:54 pm to omegaman66
We’d control the strait instead of Iran. It’s about everyone else’s oil tankers, not theirs.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 4:07 pm to RetiredSaintsLsuFan
quote:
I do believe a dirty bomb would be a credible threat.
Fair, but my point is to what end? Great, they dirty bomb a US city. What’s next? The end of Iran as a nation.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:03 pm to themunch
quote:
I am older now but some grand nephews and niece are in the Air Force now.
What do they do in the AF?
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:10 pm to BayouBengal51
I really don't like this idea if the Islamic Republic is allowed to remain in power. I just have the feeling those "Gulf Allies" will just funnel it right back to Iran and the Mullahs.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:18 pm to Nomad0369
You have to control the entire area to secure the strait, not just a few locations. As long as they can fire into the strait, doesn't matter where from, shopping will avoid it.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:22 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
This is great and all but I think it is fair to state that this is also coming at a cost to the US domestic economy too. What is that number? It seems to be making another rate hike from the Fed a possibility.
The fed does not use fuel costs in core inflation calculations, because of temporary fluctuations.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:24 pm to omegaman66
quote:
You have to control the entire area to secure the strait, not just a few locations. As long as they can fire into the strait, doesn't matter where from, shopping will avoid it.
Yes. That’s where the naval escorts come in. The islands will absorb a lot of the drones and missiles relieving pressure on the ships transiting the strait.
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:29 pm to Nomad0369
The islands won’t absorb it. IS troops on the islands will.
One wants to be used as cannon fodder. They won’t have access to bunkers there.
One wants to be used as cannon fodder. They won’t have access to bunkers there.
Page 1040 of 1101
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News