- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:44 pm to Pesticide
quote:
I haven't been following this a whole lot but did I just hear this guy say his dad was a Russian immigrant?
The irony, right?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:44 pm to boomtown143
quote:
Most disappointing hearing for Repubs so far.
They could have had Vindman
Uh, were you actually watching? They nailed his arse, and Schiff's, to the wall.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:45 pm to Centinel
Does this resume this afternoon or is today over?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:45 pm to LSU Patrick
Peter Welch looks like he's gonna die any second lmfao
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:46 pm to BananaManCan
Cant trust a welcher
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:46 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Does this resume this afternoon
Resumes at 220pm EDT.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:47 pm to boomtown143
quote:
Most disappointing hearing for Repubs so far.
They could have had Vindman
wat
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:47 pm to Centinel
So Schiff has said he doesn't know the whistleblower and Vindman said he doesn't know the whistleblower. However, during the questioning when Vindman was being questioned on who he told about the July 25th call Schiff and Vindman's lawyer knew right when to step in and block Vindman from going any further.
How in the world is this not perjury?
How in the world is this not perjury?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:47 pm to Centinel
Different testimonies though. These two are done.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:48 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Cant trust a welcher
Whoa now.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:48 pm to Stonehog
Lol
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:50 pm to momentoftruth87
So basically, both witnesses aren't on the same page, Vindman keeps bringing up that the president "demanded an investigation" but transcript says otherwise. Why in the actual frick hasn't this pointless hearing been dismissed?!
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:53 pm to boomtown143
quote:Susan Rice said this over a month ago and the democrats/media continued the lie that it was obstruction.
LINK
Vindy says it again today and this is how insane it has become; the dems and media will still continue this obstruction narrative. Even though Trump had every right after his classified calls were leaked
Schiff leaving out that whoever leaked POTUS foreign leader convos is subject to very serious charges.
The bloated NSC has 500. It is being cut down to 100.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:54 pm to momentoftruth87
Any credible and unbiased source has to admit that this dude's testimony was a disaster. He looked like he was about to cry and/or piss his pants and was called out on several inconsistencies. To date not 1 single witness has said they saw anything illegal or classified that they heard as being illegal. It was simply "unusual" "an irregular channel". This is why there has been a 10 point drop in independent voters who think this hearing is valid and unbiased.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:56 pm to boomtown143
quote:
They could have had Vindman
What are you referring to?
Play the part of what you think should have been said that would have really "got" Vinny.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:56 pm to lsursb
. fricking Juan Williams.Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:56 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
Different testimonies though.
Correct. Volkman and Miller? are up next.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:57 pm to Janky
Some questions:
If the Crowdstrike server has the evidence of Russian Interference in our elections, why would Putin be pushing that narrative? Schiff's statement makes no sense.
If Zelenskyy was desperate, and Trump ordered him to investigate, why did no investigation occur?
Are leaders required to explain to their subordinates why they are making certain decisions? Must those subordinates agree with their reasoning before following orders? If Trump knows something corrupt happened with either Biden he's within his power to investigate. He wouldn't tell the investigators because that could influence their judgement and investigation. You don't tell your subordinates because you don't want to influence them or create a leak situation.
If the Crowdstrike server has the evidence of Russian Interference in our elections, why would Putin be pushing that narrative? Schiff's statement makes no sense.
If Zelenskyy was desperate, and Trump ordered him to investigate, why did no investigation occur?
Are leaders required to explain to their subordinates why they are making certain decisions? Must those subordinates agree with their reasoning before following orders? If Trump knows something corrupt happened with either Biden he's within his power to investigate. He wouldn't tell the investigators because that could influence their judgement and investigation. You don't tell your subordinates because you don't want to influence them or create a leak situation.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 12:57 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Page 36 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News