- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Obama may NOT have immunity…
Posted on 7/28/25 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 7/28/25 at 11:38 pm
Newsmax reports that Digenova says Obama does not have immunity for the Russia Gate fraud and collusion since it wasn’t a part of presidents function…..
LINK
LINK
20
Posted on 7/28/25 at 11:44 pm to Zgeo
Posted on 7/28/25 at 11:48 pm to Zgeo
Posted on 7/29/25 at 12:04 am to Zgeo
You mean to tell me that spying on your political opponent's campaign isn't an official, like kosher, act? No shite? 
Posted on 7/29/25 at 12:05 am to Zgeo
You're gonna need some Epstein magic to get John Roberts on board with that.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 12:21 am to Zgeo
Presidents dont have immunity for acts unrelated to situations that aren't presidential.
Commit felony that isn't related to country but, no immunity
Commit felony that isn't related to country but, no immunity
Posted on 7/29/25 at 12:25 am to Zgeo
If they decide they want to charge him, the decision as to whether or not he can even be charged would go all of the way to the Supreme Court anyway, and I don't think anybody tries to charge him without being 100% sure they can. Thats not a can of worms anyone wants to open. Obama skates, but hopefully they get some underlings. The thing i want to know is whether or not you can impeach a former president for thing that were don't when they were president, although after impeaching Trump twice, it's become a laughable and pointless exercise.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 12:29 am to LSUSkip
quote:did that happen with Trump?
If they decide they want to charge him, the decision as to whether or not he can even be charged would go all of the way to the Supreme Court anyway
Posted on 7/29/25 at 1:33 am to Zgeo
Immunity from what?
I’ve read a lot of opinions on what he has done wrong, but I haven’t seen any evidence of what he has done that is illegal. He didn’t trust or agree with what his advisors told him and told them to find the truth.
He basically said I am hearing “this” find the evidence that this is true. He never told them to make something up. What he did is not illegal
I’ve read a lot of opinions on what he has done wrong, but I haven’t seen any evidence of what he has done that is illegal. He didn’t trust or agree with what his advisors told him and told them to find the truth.
He basically said I am hearing “this” find the evidence that this is true. He never told them to make something up. What he did is not illegal
Posted on 7/29/25 at 1:44 am to MizzouBS
If Obama hasn’t done anything wrong then he needs to submit himself to the appropriate Congressional committees and make a statement that he’ll answer any and all questions, under oath and penalty of law of course, and not plead the Fifth on any questions whatsoever.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 1:45 am to MizzouBS
At a minimum he initiated a seditious conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected government. Yes, this will be illegal. And there is much more to come as this was just the beginning of a years long (currently still going) operation.
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 1:47 am
Posted on 7/29/25 at 1:53 am to Kafka
Federal charges vs state. Different entities.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 2:32 am to Zgeo
Don’t waste your time thinking about stuff that won’t happen.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:07 am to MizzouBS
quote:
He basically said I am hearing “this” find the evidence that this is true. He never told them to make something up
He'll claim that's what he did, but was he not briefed in 2016 that the whole Russian interference narrative was a scheme cooked up by Hillary?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:24 am to MizzouBS
Au contraire mein fren
He told them to spin the Russian influence.
FBI came back with nothing and less than a month from Trump's inauguration he had Brennan and the boys working on the smear of DJT.
He is guilty as frick; however, I am sure all internal docs have him with plausible deniability.
He told them to spin the Russian influence.
FBI came back with nothing and less than a month from Trump's inauguration he had Brennan and the boys working on the smear of DJT.
He is guilty as frick; however, I am sure all internal docs have him with plausible deniability.
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 6:25 am
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:30 am to MizzouBS
If Trump was the victim, then it has to be illegal.
Unless Obama was doing this in a campaign or outside of his capacity as Commander in Chief. Like a private business deal, etc.. I don't see how this is even a legit strategy.
This will end up as part of Trumpist lore. People will waste time speaking about it off and on for the next 2 years. Hannity will get some mileage out of it to keep his 70 year old audience to keep watching.
Unless Obama was doing this in a campaign or outside of his capacity as Commander in Chief. Like a private business deal, etc.. I don't see how this is even a legit strategy.
This will end up as part of Trumpist lore. People will waste time speaking about it off and on for the next 2 years. Hannity will get some mileage out of it to keep his 70 year old audience to keep watching.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:53 am to KiwiHead
Are you paid to be this ignorant or do you peddle your retardedness for free?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:54 am to davyjones
The problem is it doesn’t matter if it’s true if there is no evidence he did anything illegal. Congress has had this information for over 6 years and done nothing. In 2020 Macro Rubio wrote a report on the Russia interring in the election when he was Chair of the Senate Intelligence committee. He agreed that Russia meddled in the election and it helped Trump, but there was no collusion. He had the Obama memo’s, notes to briefings, and his own investigation team and didn’t find it important enough to put anything about Obama in the final report.
Has Congress asked for a Congressional committee? He made a public statement that this was all political BS
AlterEd
What part of the information that Gabbard declassified is seditious conspiracy? Not an opinion, but facts of what he did. Even if it is implied he didn’t tell anyone to makeup false information.
Jax-Tiger
He can disagree with all the information that he is being briefed on and there is nothing illegal about that. Trump did this after the 2020 election when he was briefed by the FBI, DNI, CIA, AG, and everyone else in the briefing’s. Barr resigned after not saying what Trump wanted him to do. The president doesn’t have to agree or go along with briefing’s.
quote:
If Obama hasn’t done anything wrong then he needs to submit himself to the appropriate Congressional committees and make a statement that he’ll answer any and all questions
Has Congress asked for a Congressional committee? He made a public statement that this was all political BS
AlterEd
quote:
At a minimum he initiated a seditious conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected government
What part of the information that Gabbard declassified is seditious conspiracy? Not an opinion, but facts of what he did. Even if it is implied he didn’t tell anyone to makeup false information.
Jax-Tiger
quote:
He'll claim that's what he did, but was he not briefed in 2016 that the whole Russian interference narrative was a scheme cooked up by Hillary?
He can disagree with all the information that he is being briefed on and there is nothing illegal about that. Trump did this after the 2020 election when he was briefed by the FBI, DNI, CIA, AG, and everyone else in the briefing’s. Barr resigned after not saying what Trump wanted him to do. The president doesn’t have to agree or go along with briefing’s.
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 7:02 am
Posted on 7/29/25 at 6:57 am to Zgeo
I sense another build up which will lead to yet another disappointment by people who do not understand how Washington politics work.
Better stock up on Kleenex and vagisil. It's going to be another rough ride.
Better stock up on Kleenex and vagisil. It's going to be another rough ride.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 7:04 am to KiwiHead
Tulsi’s press conference revelations of declassified info, combined with Rice”s last minute memo claiming “we did everything by the book” seem to be fodder for a Pulitzer Prize in journalism….if there were any journalists around…… 
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 7:10 am
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News