- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama judge forbids appointees, included Treasury Sec, from accessing Treasury data.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 2:55 pm to Deplorableinohio
Posted on 2/8/25 at 2:55 pm to Deplorableinohio
I’m completely spitballing here, so this is probably a stupid idea.
Could Trump move the Treasury Department to a different state with more reasonable judges? Florida? Texas?
If not the Treasury, what about other departments?
Also, why would a judge have authority over the Executive Branch? The Executive Branch doesn’t have authority over the Judicial Branch..
Using this thought process, it would be like Trump issuing an EO that prohibits judges in DC from hearing any cases for 90 days, which is complete bullshite, but you gotta play dirty to beat dirty.
It’s either that or ignore the judges orders..
Could Trump move the Treasury Department to a different state with more reasonable judges? Florida? Texas?
If not the Treasury, what about other departments?
Also, why would a judge have authority over the Executive Branch? The Executive Branch doesn’t have authority over the Judicial Branch..
Using this thought process, it would be like Trump issuing an EO that prohibits judges in DC from hearing any cases for 90 days, which is complete bullshite, but you gotta play dirty to beat dirty.
It’s either that or ignore the judges orders..
2
Posted on 2/8/25 at 2:56 pm to BigBro
quote:
Could Trump move the Treasury Department to a different state with more reasonable judges?
The Treasury Dept is in NYC?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 2:58 pm to BuckyCheese
It will be challenged and eventually struck down.
The Marxist continuing to stand in the way of the people's will are exposing themselves and will eventually have to answer for it.
The Marxist continuing to stand in the way of the people's will are exposing themselves and will eventually have to answer for it.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 2:59 pm to BuckyCheese
Since when did a bench judge have the power to stop the job of a presidents appointee in doing their jobs ?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:00 pm to the808bass
yeah, they'll ignore this pinhead
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:02 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Running multiple cases through the SC takes far too long
Not for ones that matter. Any of these cases interfering with Trump's mandate and causing a disruption in the governing of this nation will likely be expedited. Just look around, today's a new day. The upside down world we've been living in is being turned right side up!!!
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:03 pm to AGGIES
you sweet summer child
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:04 pm to BuckyCheese
Treat this like Biden treated the USSC's ruling saying there could be no forgiveness of student loans. Ignore it
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
You think the law doesn’t support the Secretary of Treasury looking at Treasury systems and payments?
Sounds like the makings of an amazing opening statement.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:06 pm to BuckyCheese
How can a political hack judge use his power to prevent the work of the American people from being done? It's time to start mocking and ignoring these corrupt sonsabitches.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:06 pm to TheSadvocate
Apparently it is limited to Treasury, so the autists can just hit any and all other departments while this works it's way to an inevitable overturn by the SC.
Of course they will likely try the same tactic elsewhere, but just keep hitting.
Of course they will likely try the same tactic elsewhere, but just keep hitting.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:07 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Sounds like the makings of an amazing opening statement.
It’s also an amazing statement to just tweet out and keep working.
You don’t have to wait for the courts to affirm you have the right to breathe to breathe.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:09 pm to BuckyCheese
Ignore his orders and the Republican Party should spend mo ey to have him disbarred and sent packing
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s also an amazing statement to just tweet out and keep working. You don’t have to wait for the courts to affirm you have the right to breathe to breathe.
Do we need laws?
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:10 pm to BuckyCheese
That carpet bagger needs dipping in hot tar and a bag of feathers dumped on his head.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:11 pm to the808bass
Why doesn’t some Fhead judge just rule that Trump has no authority?
There’s no reason to abide by any of these judges, might as well let the constitutional crisis happen, because that’s where it’s headed anyway
There’s no reason to abide by any of these judges, might as well let the constitutional crisis happen, because that’s where it’s headed anyway
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:12 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Do we need laws?
Yes. Is this a legitimate example of a judge examining the law and making a ruling?
It is not. frick off. No one is listening to your bullshite.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:12 pm to BuckyCheese
Trump should pull a Biden and pardon the Doge team from crimes they haven’t been charged with yet and tell them to roll on. Lol
This post was edited on 2/8/25 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:12 pm to the808bass
If we need laws then we need judges.
If we can’t agree on that then no need to discuss further.
If we can’t agree on that then no need to discuss further.
Posted on 2/8/25 at 3:13 pm to AGGIES
quote:Especially political hack type Judges!
If we need laws then we need judges.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News