- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT: Fox Stars Privately Expressed Disbelief About Election Fraud Claims. ‘Crazy Stuff.’
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:10 am to davyjones
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:10 am to davyjones
quote:They MANUFACTURED lightning in a bottle.
they caught lightning in a bottle in 2020. That ain’t happening again.
It happened again in 2022.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:14 am to cwill
quote:NEW YORK TIMES
Fox is doing everything the maniacs believe the MSM is doing. They’re lying for market share.
Again, NEW YORK TIMES
It is as if Disney and Netflixs boards had decided to propagandize in an effort against THEIR own attacks on white people
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 8:20 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:16 am to JJJimmyJimJames
But the reliance on the pandemic leading up to the 2020 election was absolute key for them. They were able to lean very very heavily on it because it was still “in the heat” of it thus they were still selling the fiction that it was literally a matter of life and death that they must make all these bootleg revisions to the laws and regs……to save muh democracy. And it worked for them. But they will not have that key component in 2024.
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 7:17 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:20 am to thejuiceisloose
I didn’t need Sidney Powell or Rudy to know what happened in the middle of the night when they all stopped counting around the same time.
I didn’t need Trump.
Lots of crockery took place that night.
I didn’t need Trump.
Lots of crockery took place that night.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:20 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:You comment as though this story was not a New York Times blurb,
h, I’m sure he leans right and may even believe some of his own drivel
But he clearly knew this election fraud conspiracy was horse shite and pumped it into the airways anyway
from which it is impossible to assume it is pumped horse shite
Oh it IS manufactured horse shite in the vein of New York Times propaganda - in the way they have attempted to propagandize the election FRAUD...
but what it is reaching to do here is the fantasy YOU are wishing for FROM THEM.
This is, what, around the 30th time they have propagandized this for people like you?
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:24 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Do you know what legal discovery is? Are you aware that newspapers sometimes report about it?
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:as though you are some kind of authority?
I tried to tell this board Tucker doesn't believe the bull shite he's putting on air
Sorry, that ship has alreidy sailed
and sunk
You are a warmongering thug supporter mired in bloodlust
I guess piling on a NYT article that some are trying to present as truthful, as preposterous as that remains, is in your MO
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:27 am to Decatur
quote:Are you saying New York Times is a legitimate 'newspaper'?
Are you aware that newspapers sometimes report about it?
Thats a laugh.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:31 am to JJJimmyJimJames
I’m saying you could read everything they reported in Dominions’s memo in support of their MSJ if you weren’t such a dullard. The NYT hosts a link to it.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:41 am to Decatur
quote:so you simply are disconnected from reality. and a moron.
I’m saying you could read everything they reported in Dominions’s memo in support of their MSJ if you weren’t such a dullard. The NYT hosts a link to it.
A "source" who will not report ill on the Clinton charges of Russian interference in 2016
and is an ongoing source of every time President Trump has cleared his throat not to their liking since 2015
has come out with MORE PROPAGANDIZING...
AGAIN for about the 30th time
is in any way legit from the current propagandizing angle?
uh, hard pass.
You do however remain a moron.
a moron with a conviction to harm the nation more than the Democrat Party has wrecked it.
maybe you can score an invite to the White House the next time Democrats have a voting fraud AWARDS presentation to Ruby Freeman, daughter Shae, Jocelyn Benson, and scores of other election fraud participants.
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 7:44 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:46 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Because the same candidate alleged the same thing in the 2016 Iowa primary and before the 2016 general.
I don't give a shite what he claims or doesn't , I care what's objectively true.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:47 am to davyjones
quote:-SFP
Everyone who disagrees with me is a mindless low IQ cultist blah blah blah.
That 'emperor' certainly has no clothes
"I tried to tell you people..."
GFY
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 7:58 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I tried to tell this board Tucker doesn't believe the bull shite he's putting on air Using useful idiots for his new mansion
Tucker never pushed dominion shite on air,
So...
Speaking of useful idiots.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I tried to tell this board Tucker doesn't believe the bullshite he's putting on air
Using useful idiots for his new mansion
Did Tucker spend much time on the crazies (Powell, etc.?). As I recall that was a huge complaint.
I know he spent more time on the substantive, in-depth efforts in Georgia, which might be going nowhere but those had some merit I think. It may not be grand, but it's real.
I'm not going to pretend I know and trust a TV personality, but I also don't get the sense Tucker is putting things on air and then laughing at his viewers for believing them privately.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:01 am to thejuiceisloose
Trump was at fault. Instead of grasping the visible threads, he devoted most of his time trying to grasp invisible threads.
Visible threads include:
1. Officials who didn't have the power to change election rules, changed election rules.
2. Massive ballot harvesting. He should've been encouraging ballot harvesting in the states that allow it, for the 2022 election, rather than mostly ignore ballot harvesting, or talking about it being illegal whenever he did talk about it, back then.
3. Several counting sites kicking observers out and then boarding up the windows and doors, making it impossible to see what was happening inside.
Visible threads include:
1. Officials who didn't have the power to change election rules, changed election rules.
2. Massive ballot harvesting. He should've been encouraging ballot harvesting in the states that allow it, for the 2022 election, rather than mostly ignore ballot harvesting, or talking about it being illegal whenever he did talk about it, back then.
3. Several counting sites kicking observers out and then boarding up the windows and doors, making it impossible to see what was happening inside.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:01 am to davyjones
quote:
People hate this concept, but it’s true: they caught lightning in a bottle in 2020. That ain’t happening again. That is if Republicans can get their shite together a little bit.
You're probably wrong on this. I thought they couldn't cheat to keep midterms close the way they can in a presidential election. Either they were able to or the public doesn't hate the left as much as we think.
The recipe to cheat in 2024 is easy now. Just find a few weak spots in Detroit, Philly, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Atlanta, and Vegas to pump in some "mail-ins" and it's over.
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 8:04 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
Just look at this thread. Many posters don’t believe what the Times is reporting even though their sources are sworn depositions. There are several articles on this from yesterday.
There is no question given their sworn statements that these talking heads knew what they were saying had no merit. Posters here only believe what they want to believe—facts be damned. It’s pathetic.
There is no question given their sworn statements that these talking heads knew what they were saying had no merit. Posters here only believe what they want to believe—facts be damned. It’s pathetic.
This post was edited on 2/17/23 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:24 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
so you simply are disconnected from reality
Remember when you said Ashli Babbitt wasn’t a real person?
Seek help.
Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:32 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
as though you are some kind of authority?
quote:
You are a warmongering thug supporter mired in bloodlust

Posted on 2/17/23 at 8:33 am to I B Freeman
quote:
There are several articles on this from yesterday.
Ah, but none from any source they trust since the sources they trust are unlikely to report on it. Voila, epistemic closure.
Popular
Back to top


1









