- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT: FBI sent honeypot posing as assistant to collect intel on trump aide during election
Posted on 5/2/19 at 5:52 pm to StrongSafety
Posted on 5/2/19 at 5:52 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
Keep praying guys.
We've been praying for Justice and this revelation is an answer to our prayers.
1
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:05 pm to Bunyan
quote:
They are in the vault. Saving them for first indictment
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:10 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
quote:
It amazes me people consider this news.
The news is that the New York Times feels the need to report it. Probably has something to do with Barr conforming he is investigating the investigators.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:17 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
The key was if it’s predicated.
I don't know what stage the investigation was in at the time but even if they were just conducting a non-predicated assessment they still have the ability to use confidential human sources, subject to approval. That's my best read of it.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:21 pm to Decatur
But don’t you think sending people out using fake aliases to seek info was a bit extreme?
Why not just ask Papadopoulos for an interview?
The info downer told the fbi was not evidence that papadoipos was involved or had knowledge of the hacking.
Opening a counterintel investigation against papaD was extraordinary. There was zero indication he had done anything wrong.
Why not just ask Papadopoulos for an interview?
The info downer told the fbi was not evidence that papadoipos was involved or had knowledge of the hacking.
Opening a counterintel investigation against papaD was extraordinary. There was zero indication he had done anything wrong.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:22 pm to Decatur
quote:
they still have the ability to use confidential human sources, subject to approval.
i mean, if these are the rules we're playing, then i hope you support all sorts of investigations and opposition research-funded warrants on the DEM candidates next year
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Why not just ask Papadopoulos for an interview?
or tell Trump he's a potential issue/foreign agent
quote:
Opening a counterintel investigation against papaD was extraordinary. There was zero indication he had done anything wrong.
still waiting on Carter Page's indictment/arrest
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
He doesn't care.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Carter Paige is an asset.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:53 pm to TigerBait1971
Regarding the OP, maybe I’m retarded, and I am, but why is fox not reporting on this?
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:01 pm to ShortyRob
Not directed at you shorty.
But, this is a punch in the face for the citizens who vote in this country!! All of us should be worried and angry.
But, this is a punch in the face for the citizens who vote in this country!! All of us should be worried and angry.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
But don’t you think sending people out using fake aliases to seek info was a bit extreme?
Not necessarily. I would not call it an extreme method. I don't know the exact reason why they would want someone to use a cover but it does appear to one of the tools they have. There could have been a consideration that an open approach could tip him off, especially if they were considering he may be involved as a foreign agent. I mean they investigating allegations that he was an Israeli agent. That's kinda wild by itself. With a counterintelligence investigation, a subject doesn't necessarily have to be suspected of committing a crime though.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:05 pm to DawgfaninCa
Looks like Watergate wasn't all that out of whack now.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i mean, if these are the rules we're playing,
I'm just paraphrasing the AG guidelines. I'm pretty sure this wasn't the first time someone in a campaign was looked at in a CI investigation and I'm sure it won't be the last.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:13 pm to Decatur
Decatur, believe it or not I actually respect your opinion on here more than others 
I have a question: what type of information would at least raise your eyebrow re: potential surveillance abuse.
What would be a “damning” finding in the IG report, objectively, in your view?
I have a question: what type of information would at least raise your eyebrow re: potential surveillance abuse.
What would be a “damning” finding in the IG report, objectively, in your view?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:15 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Just watched Papadopolous on Tuckers show. Barry Bathhouse Soetoro’s arse should be grass over this. Lock every one of these sick bastards up!
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:24 pm to Decatur
quote:
With a counterintelligence investigation, a subject doesn't necessarily have to be suspected of committing a crime though.
Then what’s the justification? Doesn’t make sense to me. Where does the investigation end and set up begin?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:25 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I have a question: what type of information would at least raise your eyebrow re: potential surveillance abuse
Come on man. Don't kiss up. You know as well as I do that Decatur is okay with any actions taken by the left to defeat the right. There is no spying he wouldn't have been okay with
Moreover you're talkin about the wrong subject anyways. Even if one accepts that the spying was okay we now know that this buying answered the question. There was no fricking collusion
but they still started a collusion investigation anyway. The whole thing was a fricking fraud just to justify carpet bombing the entire Trump administration with investigative craziness. And they used as justification something that they already knew didn't happen
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:54 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Electronic surveillance without a warrant would be bad (like bypassing the FISC on a non-emergency basis).
Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:01 pm to Decatur
Would intentionally misleading info in a fisa app be bad?
Page 15 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News