- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYPD sends cease and desist letter to Waze
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Was driving I12 in Louisiana last week and noticed some local sheriffs have figured out a way to immediately untag themselves in Waze. Not sure how they’re doing that because you typically have to be approaching a cop to have the option to remove one that’s “not there”.
0
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:46 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Even if we pretend they start with good intentions, they ALWAYS, 100% of the time, devolve into a method for doing shite that otherwise would not be allowed by the citizens.
Remember when civil libertarians went nuts over wiretapping US citizens using secret FISA courts to root out terrorism? I thought they acted a little crazy.
Well, we just had a dem candidate write a fan fiction piece, give to fbi, who then weaponized the FISA system to spy on a US citizen who also happened to be the GOP nominee. This is 3rd world shite. I can’t believe how passively we’ve accepted such an abuse of power
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:48 am to WorkinDawg
quote:
Well, we just had a dem candidate write a fan fiction piece, give to fbi, who then weaponized the FISA system to spy on a US citizen who also happened to be the GOP nominee. This is 3rd world shite. I can’t believe how passively we’ve accepted such an abuse of power
here is the problem, and it specifically applies to Trumpkins
your logic above is correct. the problem is it's often isolated to just that example (b/c that example likely has hurt Trump) and it ignores the bigger picture. this FISA abuse should be a wakeup call to Republicans to all state power (federal, state, and local)
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
here is the problem, and it specifically applies to Trumpkins
I don’t get your point. You think the only reason I, or Trumpers in general, care about FISA abuse is because it hurt Trump? Cause if that is your point you are way off base. I don’t know a living person who adheres to that description. When the entire Dem party in VA is black faced- I don’t suddenly agree with SJW’s on the blackface issue....but I do I love the bitter irony of it all.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
your logic above is correct. the problem is it's often isolated to just that example (b/c that example likely has hurt Trump) and it ignores the bigger picture. this FISA abuse should be a wakeup call to Republicans to all state power (federal, state, and local)
Much like trump should be a wake up call for dems on the abuse of executive power but it won’t be.
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 7:02 am
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
how any of you motherfrickers can advocate to give these sociopathic animals more power over our lives is beyond me
Hey-- I have constitutional right to assist drunks in carnage and death. Says so right there in the Bill of Rights
---err it's somewhere in there I promise.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
your logic above is correct. the problem is it's often isolated to just that example (b/c that example likely has hurt Trump) and it ignores the bigger picture. this FISA abuse should be a wakeup call to Republicans to all state power (federal, state, and local)
Oh. I completely get that now that we've decided this is acceptable, it will be used again......in the future...…..against who knows who. There are no limits to it.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:58 am to weagle99
quote:
But muh gray American flag with the blue line.
I don’t like cops.
I bet you’re still gonna call them when you need help though, filth.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:59 am to TigerGman
quote:Ahh. Another NPC who can't be bothered to actually be informed on what DWI checkpoints actually accomplish.
Hey-- I have constitutional right to assist drunks in carnage and death. Says so right there in the Bill of Rights
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 7:00 am
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:01 am to Parmen
quote:
I bet you’re still gonna call them when you need help though, filth.
Of course but this isn't actually a rebuttal.
You see. In a half decent free nations, cops should be RESPONDING to citizen needs as their only reason for interacting with citizens. Police forces should NOT be proactively engaging with citizens absent a compelling reason. Pretty much the whole point of the 4th.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:01 am to TigerGman
quote:
- I have constitutional right to assist drunks in carnage
If this happens I will stand with you against this mighty man if straw.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:02 am to Dire Wolf
quote:
trump should be a wake up call for dems on the abuse of executive power
i agree
i continue to try to teach my lefty friends this message over and over again
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the only reason why DAs and Sheriffs in LA want to keep weed illegal is b/c it's an easy way to search cars and intimidate people
Truth
It creates a way to get you into the system. It's not about public safety, it's about getting as many people as possible legally under the thumb.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:03 am to TigerGman
quote:
I have constitutional right to assist drunks in carnage and death. Says so right there in the Bill of Rights
---err it's somewhere in there I promise.
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:07 am to ShortyRob
Compelling reason to stop drivers who are driving drunk or impaired. Don’t like it, don’t drive. You don’t have a constitutional right to drive on the roads.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
or abridging the freedom of speech
Sure and I can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater too, right?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:10 am to TigerGman
quote:
Sure and I can shout "FIRE" in a crowded theater too, right?
how is that comparable to communicating something you actually saw in public?
how is that comparable to amplifying comments made by the police/state about the checkpoint?
your argument is that if you actually see fire in a theater and you calmly tell people that there is a fire, it should be illegal b/c people may make up a fake fire and use that lie to create havoc. how irrational can you be?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:11 am to Parmen
quote:
Compelling reason to stop drivers who are driving drunk or impaired.
if only they actually worked well
quote:
You don’t have a constitutional right to drive on the roads.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:12 am to TigerGman
quote:
Hey-- I have constitutional right to assist drunks in carnage and death
They aren't just pulling over drunks, hence the problem.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 7:15 am to SlowFlowPro
Glad I can help. This counts towards billable hours.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News