- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No SCOTUS Ruling on Tariffs Until Next Year?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 7:42 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 11/11/25 at 7:42 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:where the frick are you idiots coming from?
wackatimesthree
1
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:18 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:And every car and parts manufacturer would start opening factories here. See how that works? We are the market that everyone wants to be in.
the next Democratic POTUS could claim that Climate Change represented an emergency situation and declare a 100% tariff on all gasoline automobiles and parts for gas cars imported into the country.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:30 pm to wackatimesthree
Just a reminder.. he's still president for 3 more years.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:37 pm to oldskule
I think he wins 6-3 also. They asked some pretty pointed questions though, and did seem to have issues.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:40 pm to John somers
quote:
Thats a lot of whining for such a short post.
That's not even a tiny fraction of the whining that's going to occur here when the Democrats walk through the door Trump has opened with this unless the SCOTUS closes it.
(Which they will. And it won't be close.)
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:42 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Why would you pretend a world exists without political repurcussions?
Why would you cheer for a POTUS opening the door to disaster?
Again, this didn't fall out of the sky. Trump pushing so hard to expand presidential powers was a decision.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:43 pm to Demonbengal
quote:
I think he wins 6-3 also.
If Trump doesn't lose this case by at least 6-3, I'll eat my hat.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:44 pm to SaintsReportExile
quote:
Just a reminder.. he's still president for 3 more years.
Yeah?
I plan on being around after that, though. You don't?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:48 pm to greygoose
quote:
And every car and parts manufacturer would start opening factories here. See how that works?
I do see how that works.
I even understand why that manufacturing was outsourced in the first place...because it's a whole lot more expensive than manufacturing here.
So just like Trump's (idiot) tariffs, if that happened it would probably cause the price of gas cars to increase (by a conservative estimate) at least 20%3-30%.
Either way, get ready to pay $100,000 for your previously $80,000 truck. Or you could embrace EV tech. Buy yourself a Tesla.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:49 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
That's the way the law is written.
Well, that's your opinion of how the law is written.
Unfortunately for Trump, the opinion that matters is SCOTUS' opinion.
And they've already told Biden that that interpretation will not fly.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:50 pm to CAD703X
quote:
where the frick are you idiots coming from?
Joe.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:51 pm to wackatimesthree
They have asked for an expedited decision so maybe by the end of the year. Also I expect them to find some way to say that many of the tariff’s are unconstitutional but that will be prospectively so the money doesn’t have to be returned. It seemed like even the plaintiff attorney was open to that.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:52 pm to rstamp1
quote:
They have asked for an expedited decision so maybe by the end of the year. Also I expect them to find some way to say that many of the tariff’s are unconstitutional but that will be prospectively so the money doesn’t have to be returned. It seemed like even the plaintiff attorney was open to that.
Thank you for one of a small handful of intelligent replies on this thread.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:08 pm to wackatimesthree
And Trump will just put in place a different type of tariff that is more targeted by industry. I think he also realizes he has gone too far on tariff’s because he has been rolling some back the last few weeks. Now he has said he’s will be reducing some tariffs on items like coffee
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:45 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
And there would be nothing anyone could do about it. Trump's tariffs are clearly just as much an abuse of presidential powers as that would be.
Bush and Clinton cut tariffs without Congress so why can’t Trump impose tariffs?
The precedent was already set.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:53 pm to wackatimesthree
I will be around when Vance has his 8 years following to watch people cry harder.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:57 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Why would you cheer for a POTUS opening the door to disaster?
This response doesn’t make any sense in the context of what I said.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:12 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Well, that's your opinion of how the law is written.
No, that's how the law is written. That was proven during oral arguments.
quote:
Unfortunately for Trump, the opinion that matters is SCOTUS' opinion.
You mean "unfortunately for the country." Going to be great when Trump has to issue full trade embargos for negotiation purposes instead of simply tariffs.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:15 am to rstamp1
quote:
I expect them to find some way to say that many of the tariff’s are unconstitutional but that will be prospectively so the money doesn’t have to be returned. It seemed like even the plaintiff attorney was open to that.
If they ruled against the tariffs, which would make no sense, they would have to do this or it would be complete chaos.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 5:25 am to wackatimesthree
The SCOTUS needs to answer for their f-up allowing tariff revenue to be collected while this case played out in court, given the potential economic impacts
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News