- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No Murder Charge for Robber Who Allegedly Shot Clerk Dead
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:04 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:04 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
I thought you are responsible for any death while you are committing a felony?
These "bought" DA's don't care.
This is why most people agree our legal system is beyond broke and not fixable.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 12:05 pm
0
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:06 pm to Codythetiger
quote:Not once. Ever.
You're talking about a guy who defends and promote child sex
Why are you compelled to lie and fabricate positions I have never taken? Are my ACTUAL positions unassailable?
quote:If this person is still posting at 5 PM today, we will have conclusive confirmation of concerns re moderation of this site.
Hank needs a bullet to the brain
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You're talking about a guy who defends and promote child sex
Not once. Ever.
Absolutely, you just have no social awareness.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But this is a great reminder to not shoot criminals running away from you
This is a fact - esp in places where you have a liberal DA.
Even though you just got robbed at gun point, they will argue that he was in retreat and there was no longer a threat to your life and you will get charged with murder.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
IF the original felony is defined as being complete, he would not have still been engaged in a felony when he fired the shots.
He could be committing a felony by just possessing the gun. Assuming a criminal probably doesn’t have a legally purchased and registered gun.
quote:
Individuals illegally possessing a gun may also face a more serious felony charge. These charges can come with a jail sentence of up to 20 years in state prison.
California also uses sentencing enhancements on crimes committed with a firearm. This means that additional years are added to a sentence if a gun was used while committing a serious felony. These enhancements allow California judges to add the following to a prison sentence:
10 years if you possess a gun
20 years if you fire a weapon
25 years if you seriously hurt or kill someone with a gun
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:15 pm to dgnx6
quote:
He could be committing a felony by just possessing the gun. Assuming a criminal probably doesn’t have a legally purchased and registered gun.
You would think a state that's afraid of everything that moves would be a little angry at this fella.
Democrats always defend the perp, unless the perp isn't one of their protected people.
That's why Hank is in every one of these threads shooting you rednecks down. Even shitty people who harm others have rights.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:18 pm to dgnx6
quote:
He could be committing a felony by just possessing the gun. Assuming a criminal probably doesn’t have a legally purchased and registered gun.
Think about how f'd up this is:
Thug wakes up and starts planning thug shite.
Clerk wakes up, goes to work and lives the life of a productive citizen.
POS scum Prosecutor wakes up and decides to destroy lives instead of being a productive human.
Evil wins the day yet again.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:21 pm to djmed
They let the white supremacists get away with anything .
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:21 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Evil wins the day yet again.
He will kill someone soon enough.
A thief with a firearm has intention to kill you. Soy boys don't quite understand.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I think that I detect a note of sarcasm in the font you selected. But this really is a problem.
Even shitty people who harm others have rights.
“Bill of rights? Hell, he’s guilty. That don’t apply to him.“
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
This is murder in most states.
The perp doesn’t get to claim self defense because he was shot at by the guy he robbed.
The perp doesn’t get to claim self defense because he was shot at by the guy he robbed.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:24 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I think that I detect a note of sarcasm in the font you selected. But this really is a problem.
“Bill of rights? Hell, he’s guilty. That don’t apply to him.“
No one said that but you.
You can't see anything outside of extremes
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:24 pm to AggieHank86
Now you have moved from grooming to letting murderers off...never change Hank.
What a piece of shite.
What a piece of shite.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:27 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
This is murder in most states.
Yep, quite a few in the least.
California has always gone overboard to protect the shittiest of residents at the expense of the middle class, which is fleeing in droves.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:30 pm to Houag80
quote:we were discussing whether there might be any legal justification under California law for the actions of that particular prosecutor.
Now you have moved … to letting murderers off...never change Hank.
You are a drooling imbecile.
How in the holy Hell did you manage to get a degree from my beloved university?
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:31 pm to TigerCoon
Shocking
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:34 pm to AggieHank86
You are feces, pure and simple. You can hide behind your supposed legal "expertise" but that does not mitigate your unabashed willingness to support criminals like these or pedos and trannies.
Go fck yourself Hank.
Go fck yourself Hank.
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:36 pm to dafif
quote:
In virtually every state felony murder has applied to getaway drivers
It does. Here is a relevant portion from a CA Supreme Court Case
quote:
At trial, defense counsel requested that the jury be instructed on the escape rule, as set out in CALCRIM No. 3261. That instruction (as adapted to apply to a male perpetrator when the alleged crime is burglary) reads: “The crime of burglary continues until the perpetrator has actually reached a temporary place of safety. The perpetrator has reached a temporary place of safety if he has
7 successfully escaped from the scene, is no longer being chased[, and has unchallenged possession of the property].” (See CALCRIM No. 3261.)
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:38 pm to jchamil
quote:A rare example of sanity in California law.
“The crime of burglary continues until the perpetrator has actually reached a temporary place of safety. The perpetrator has reached a temporary place of safety if he has successfully escaped from the scene, is no longer being chased, and has unchallenged possession of the property.”
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:40 pm to Houag80
quote:
You are feces, pure and simple.
Nah, he's just a bleeding heart incapable of understanding life outside a legal framework.
He's restricted to one subject. Autists usually have no social IQ.
Common sense is foreign to his type, everything has to be legalized and baby stepped.
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 12:42 pm
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News