Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Ninth Circuit Permanently Enjoins CA Law Targeting Federal Officers w/ "No Mask" Law

Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:38 pm
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
79016 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:38 pm

quote:

Huge legal victory this morning in the Ninth Circuit, where the court permanently enjoined California’s unconstitutional mask law targeting federal agents.

“We conclude that § 10 of the No Vigilantes Act attempts to directly regulate the United States in its performance of governmental functions. The Supremacy Clause forbids the State from enforcing such legislation. The United States is therefore likely to succeed on the merits of its Supremacy Clause claim, and the other preliminary injunction factors also weigh in its favor. Thus, we grant the motion for an injunction pending appeal.”
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
40172 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to
See you at the Supreme Court
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
105140 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:46 pm to
SCOTUS is unlikely to take this one, IMHO, unless they plan on hobbling the supremacy clause.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38316 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

See you at the Supreme Court

Negative.

"Writ Denied."
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36477 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm to
California: "I think we should make a law dictating what federal officers are allowed to wear"

Posted by Tim
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
7136 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:53 pm to
They should identify as covid intolerant and problem is solved. Masks are allowed for covid preventers.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
77793 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:56 pm to
Wear bald caps, huge goggles and black face paint.

Problem solved. There are ways to disguise your identity beyond a mask
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
26092 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

See you at the Supreme Court


Um, did you read it wrong. Ninth killed CA law. Is California taking it to Supreme Court???
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
21370 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:34 pm to
I don't think people know how to comprehend.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24608 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Um, did you read it wrong. Ninth killed CA law. Is California taking it to Supreme Court???


Thanks for the summary. Frickin' lawyer speak!
Posted by BozemanTiger
Member since Jul 2020
4988 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:17 pm to
The SC vacates the 9th?



Good luck.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144641 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

See you at the Supreme Court


You think SCOTUS will rule against the supremacy clause?

The California law was dead on arrival. It was performative on Greasy”s part to fund raise for his presidential run.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram