- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New York Judge Says 2nd Amendment 'Doesn't Exist in This Courtroom'
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:26 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:26 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
It's a yes or no question which are answered either yes or no.
Me:
quote:
Statistically, do you think the fact that she's a black female judge says NOTHING about her politics?
You:
quote:
I don't really care.
Idiot.
0
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:29 pm to stout
quote:
Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom. It doesn’t exist here. So you can’t argue Second Amendment. This is New York.'
Is there not a court stenographer in this judge's courtroom? If so and the have this on record, she's screwed.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:32 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:32 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
WildTchoupitoulas is what we call “light in the foot”
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:33 pm to Oates Mustache
quote:
Is there not a court stenographer in this judge's courtroom?
There certainly is. The appellate courts should have fun with that.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:36 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
No you didn't
Yes, I did. I'm not sure how you continue to miss it.
Here you go:
quote:
I think her politics, which I actually looked up, says a lot about her politics...
quote:
You said you "addressed it" but you didn't answer it.
Correct, and you tried to claim that was wrong. It wasn't, as I've shown you three times now.
Also, I think my response should answer your question...
quote:
Why is it not surprising to me that you would find it odd to lead by example?
You're leading other racists by showing them how racist you are?
That's your assertion?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:36 pm to stout
Excellent news. Supports my notion that the 16th ammendment doesn't exist in relation to any assets owned by me and my extended family.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:38 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
A colored woman?
That is not saying something about her, it is asking a rhetorical question. Her photo had already been posted multiple times by posters, one without even comment.
That you want to ignore the vast amount of my posts that have been about other posters is simply deflection away from the point.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 1:41 pm to Indefatigable
quote:IMO, acknowledging statistical probabilities (alone) is not "racism" by any reasonable definition. No elements of hatred or "inherent inferiority" in that.quote:It is not racist to observe that black female judges are likely to be leftists .... What is "racist" about that observation? Literally every single black female judge I have interacted with fits that description. What is racist about not being surprised that a judge who acted the way described in the OP is a black woman?
I'm focusing on the posters ITT who try, but not too hard, to dance around their blatant racism.
OTOH, that does not mean that one cannot look at a given poster's overall body of work and draw the reasonable conclusion that he or she is a virulent racist, trying very hard to hide that fact behind a very thin veneer.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News