- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Trump sexual assault accusation from the Huffington Post
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:05 pm to NIH
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:05 pm to NIH
quote:So the skank has a new book that she's promoting. I was wondering what the angle was here.
The allegation against Trump by E. Jean Carroll is included in her upcoming book about the "hideous men" that the Elle magazine columnist says she has encountered throughout her life.
God these people are pathetic.
0
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:12 pm to MI LSU
quote:
Christine Ford's resume is fricking insane: several advanced degrees from top-tier universities; career academic/scientist...
But since she made a claim against one of your guys, she MUST be lying. She MUST be some sort of deep-state plant, who spent decades and decades getting degrees and doing research and teaching and publishing--building up her reputation as a decent, hard-working woman--JUST so in her middle age, she could use all that cultural currency to make a phony claim on some bro idiot supreme court nominee.
no, she’s lying because she didn’t know ANY factual details- you know, like the fricking YEAR, which house, which road, which City, how old she was, etc- which are pretty BASIC details- certainly ones that a highly educated PSYCHOLOGIST would be able to recall about such a “traumatic” event. Some how the ONLY “fact” she remembered is “Brett Kavanaugh.” Not to mention, she claimed a fear of flying, due to small spaces with no escape, as an excuse to not travel to DC to testify originally, yet a quick check of her passport showed she’d been jetting all across the globe up until then.
Throw in the super convenient leak of her story by Feinstein at the last minute, coupled with who the Dems arranged to be her “lawyer”, and you have an obvious bullshite concocted story with an obvious agenda by a desperate political party who had been, and continues to be- having their asses handed to them on every single issue you think of.
Anything else?
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:13 pm to cable
This picture screams....
#someonepleaserapeme!
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:37 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Not unknown year and not unknown month. Ford said that the incident occurred 6 to 8 weeks before she ran into Mark Judge bagging groceries. In his book, Judge confirmed that he worked bagging groceries late that same summer.
30 years after the fact
Unknown location
Unknown year
Unknown month
Named witnesses don't recall
That also coincides to the July 1st entry on Kavanaugh's calendar where he notes there was a party at a different location from where the incident in question was alleged to occur. The people Ford said were at the incident were at the party described on Kavanaugh's calendar.
The information on the calendar coincides with Ford's testimony that she thought the incident party was a gathering before another party was to take place.
And, you remember that July 1st entry was the calendar entry that the Republican's hired questioner was asking Kavanaugh about at th hearing when the Republicans abruptly took a break in the hearing, and when it reconvened, the hired questioner was never heard from again. It was obvious the Republicans didn't want any more questions about the July 1st party.
Not to mention all the crap Kavanaugh first denied that was contradicted in Judge's book and in Kavanaugh's own letter describing the agenda for "beach week".
And, of course, there would have been a lot more information to make a judgement from about Ford's accusation if the Republicans hadn't disingenuously sandbagged the hearing.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:50 pm to texridder
quote:
And, of course, there would have been a lot more information to make a judgement from about Ford's accusation if the Republicans hadn't disingenuously sandbagged the hearing.
Or if she'd disclosed the allegations at the time they occurred. Or when Kavanaugh was working on Clinton's impeachment. Or when he was nominated to serve on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Or when Feinstein was told of it before the hearings even began. That you believe Republicans sandbagged a hearing is proof of how delusional you really are.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 8:55 pm to SCLibertarian
One curious item that would seem to have helped is/are notes from her supposed counseling/therapy that was at least in part necessary due to this this event. She said she sought and received such therapy, but no offering of doctor/therapist notes that one would assume to exist.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:06 pm to Ray Corona
quote:
Comparing her to all of Trump's other conquests there is something wrong about this story. It simply doesn't add up. I don't know how you go from having sex with some of the worlds most beautiful women to this..........
He had just dumped 49 year old Ivana for 30 year old Marla Maples and somehow we are supposed to believe he decided to rape a 52 year old woman who was never as attractive as either of those two on her best day when in her 20s
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:09 pm to NIH
I would imagine that Bergdorf Goodman had cameras in their stores, and there would have been video evidence of her account had she filed a report when it happened.
This post was edited on 6/21/19 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:18 pm to NIH
One look at dat bitch and I knew she is lying. 
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:26 pm to Revelator
quote:
video evidence of her account
You mean like this?
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:29 pm to texridder
quote:
And, of course, there would have been a lot more information to make a judgement from about Ford's accusation if the Republicans hadn't disingenuously sandbagged the hearing.
There should never have been a frickING "HEARING" in the first place this dude was background checked by the FBI 7 frickING TIMES and answered thousands of written questions each time, there's no physical evidence, there's no contemporaneous corroboration by witnesses, no police report, no investigation, no nothing! Kavanaugh WAS A NOBODY THEN, she could have easily reported it to the police and no one would have batted an eye, she did not, she never uttered a word about it for 30 YEARS, people's memories after such a long period of time are not too reliable, she's also the same person who lied about a fear of flying when her passport indicates otherwise. HER FRIENDS CONTRADICTED HER ON THE PARTY. This dude's a fricking disgrace tryna make up facts when there aren't any.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:32 pm to texridder
quote:
And, of course, there would have been a lot more information to make a judgement from about Ford's accusation if the Republicans hadn't disingenuously sandbagged the hearing.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:49 pm to texridder
quote:
Not unknown year and not unknown month. Ford said that the incident occurred 6 to 8 weeks before she ran into Mark Judge bagging groceries. In his book, Judge confirmed that he worked bagging groceries late that same summer. That also coincides to the July 1st entry on Kavanaugh's calendar where he notes there was a party at a different location from where the incident in question was alleged to occur. The people Ford said were at the incident were at the party described on Kavanaugh's calendar. The information on the calendar coincides with Ford's testimony that she thought the incident party was a gathering before another party was to take place. And, you remember that July 1st entry was the calendar entry that the Republican's hired questioner was asking Kavanaugh about at th hearing when the Republicans abruptly took a break in the hearing, and when it reconvened, the hired questioner was never heard from again. It was obvious the Republicans didn't want any more questions about the July 1st party. Not to mention all the crap Kavanaugh first denied that was contradicted in Judge's book and in Kavanaugh's own letter describing the agenda for "beach week". And, of course, there would have been a lot more information to make a judgement from about Ford's accusation if the Republicans hadn't disingenuously sandbagged the hearing.
Ahh yes— you would have a legitimate viewpoint, except for the fact that all of your examples of “corroborating evidence” were only “developed” by Ford AFTER Kavanaugh and others provided evidence that contradicted her original story.
If you recall, she claimed her therapists notes were “evidence,” but those notes had a completely different range of years the attack occurred, how many people were there, where the house was, and they didn’t include a name! Oh, and she also refused to provide those “corroborating” notes to Congress- how convenient!
USA Today article
Fords original letter- where the only person she “names” is Judge. She only recalled other names after seeing kav’s calendar
Also, Ford could’ve pursued criminal charges against Kav for this attack, even after his confirmation, if she knew her allegations to be true. But, alas she didn’t, because she knew it was all a bullshite smear attempt to try and derail his confirmation. Hence the reason she’s not been heard from since, and now lives quietly in a new house, closer to her attacker, in a house with only one front door.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:58 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:What in the hell due process are you talking about? It's a Supreme Court confirmation hearing. It's not a criminal case. It's not a civil case. If a Senator thinks that Kavanaugh was lying and doesn't believes that such a Supreme Court nominee should be confirmed that is the end of the consideration as to his vote.
No prosecutor would take that case to trial. No plaintiff's lawyer would file a civil suit with those facts. You want to turn due process into a lynch mob.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:11 pm to texridder
Lol ridder pulling the same “not a courtroom” shite the libtards pulled the time of the confirmation sorry ridder WE LIVE IN AMERICA NOT THE SOVIET UNION WHERE WE AFFORD THE ACCUSED THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT UNTIL THE EVIDENCE PROVES OTHERWISE BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IN FREEDOM AND THE AMERICAN DREAM NOT SOCIAL JUSTICE RETARDATION this motherfricker here what drugs is he taking?
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:14 pm to texridder
quote:
If a Senator thinks that Kavanaugh was lying and doesn't believes that such a Supreme Court nominee should be confirmed that is the end of the consideration as to his vote.
None of the Dems except Manchin were going to vote for Kavanaugh.
That will be true for the rest of Trump's nominees for Supreme Court.
It was a smear job to try to pick off weak-kneed Republicans and it almost worked.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:21 pm to Ace Midnight
What about Sinema? She’s voted for a bunch of Trump stuff so far maybe she’ll be like Manchin plus she’s bi and really hot with a great rack
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:22 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Because it's just part of your standard bullshite. Like the claim you make all the time that the other person in the dicussion doesn't even believe what they are saying. Just how stupid is that?
Well, he had less than 10 posts prior to this year on this board. So, it isn't like I had to go thru piles.
Why dost thou protest so much?
Or when someone is stating an opinion and you call them a liar. It's an opinion jackass. Yep you say that same crap all the time. it's laughable.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:34 pm to SCLibertarian
[
quote:When did Kavanaugh produce his calendar? Was it 2 or 3 days before the hearing? Did Mark Judge testify at the hearing? Did the Republicans refuse to turn over information on Kavanaugh's time while he was working at the White House??
That you believe Republicans sandbagged a hearing is proof of how delusional you really are.
Page 11 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News