- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New study identifies a psychological factor linked to Trump supporters’ vindictiveness
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:01 pm
LINK
Sorry, I know most folks are probably tired of these, but this one was just way over the top bad.
As if we needed more information that academia was fully out of its mind and corrupt to the core. Someone probably paid this garbage psychology journal to publish this.
I wonder when these folks will look into the Bernie Bros who have shot people, attempted to bomb political events, and committed acts of thuggery outside homes of people they dont like.
Sorry, I know most folks are probably tired of these, but this one was just way over the top bad.
As if we needed more information that academia was fully out of its mind and corrupt to the core. Someone probably paid this garbage psychology journal to publish this.
I wonder when these folks will look into the Bernie Bros who have shot people, attempted to bomb political events, and committed acts of thuggery outside homes of people they dont like.
quote:
The desire to matter and feel significant among Donald Trump supporters is associated with support for hostile and vindictive actions against the president’s political rivals, according to new research published in the journal Political Psychology. In a series of studies conducted immediately before and after the 2016 election in the United States, the researchers examined how the quest for personal significance was related to confrontational intergroup behaviors.
quote:
“Our team studies what motivates people to support and engage in radical political actions. In the past we focused on actions — both peaceful and violent — that were aimed against the political system such as protesting, donating money for a cause, or using politically motivated violence,” explained study author Katarzyna Jasko, an associate professor at Jagiellonian University in Poland.
quote:
“In this study we wanted to look at both sides and to explore the motivations of not only those who protest against the government but also those who support it. Our thinking was that just like some citizens contest the system and engage in aggressive actions directed against it, the government can use its power in benevolent or hostile ways and it’s important to understand whether its supporters accept it, and if so why?”
quote:
The researchers surveyed 189 supporters of Donald Trump and 305 supporters of Hillary Clinton the week preceding Election Day about how different outcomes of the election would make them feel. The participants also indicated their willingness to engage in actions against the future president and their support for hypothetical actions performed by the president against his or her political opponents.
“We asked whether they would support their elected president if, for example, he or she sued the media that criticized them, used the military to stop anti-government demonstrations, investigated political opponents’ email accounts or, in contrast, he or she demonstrated respect for their political opponents and included them in a political process,” Jasko explained.
The researchers then repeated the study with another 217 Trump voters and 261 Clinton voters a week after the 2016 election.
“We were interested whether psychological factors such as gain of personal significance (i.e., feeling proud, strong, and important) derived from the victory of one’s political candidate or loss of personal significance (i.e., feeling humiliated, excluded, and ashamed) experienced after the defeat could predict those peaceful or aggressive reactions,” Jasko said.
Trump supporters were more likely to approve of him taking hostile actions against his political opponents than Clinton supporters were to approve hers. The more Trump supporters thought his election would result in a gain of personal significance, the more supportive they were of his hostile actions.
This post was edited on 3/28/20 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:03 pm to tiggerthetooth
OMB
White people bad
Uneducated white people bad
more wypipo bad
White people bad
Uneducated white people bad
more wypipo bad
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:05 pm to tiggerthetooth
The left has apparently reached the rationalization stage of grief from HRC being defeated.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:05 pm to tiggerthetooth
Study was performed a week after the election. Nothing unbiased about that sample group. Eyeroll
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:06 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Trump supporters were more likely to approve of him taking hostile actions against his political opponents than Clinton supporters were to approve hers
That’s rich right there. They were smokin’ some primo stuff, apparently.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:15 pm to tiggerthetooth
If only we had a (steve)cough, (scalise)cough as an example...
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:18 pm to tiggerthetooth
They see a bunch of conservatives fell for their version of epidemiology so they’re trying to sway them with psychology.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:24 pm to Upperaltiger06
Well, it seems Trump’s enemies don’t like America or Freedom, so there’s that...
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:27 pm to CamdenTiger
r/science is complete garbage. Too often social or political “science” gets a lot of attention there compared to actual scientific articles
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:33 pm to tiggerthetooth
What Dick gobbling bullshite
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:38 pm to tiggerthetooth
Journal of political psychology
Lol
Lol
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:39 pm to tiggerthetooth
Mmmmkay. Let me know when actual Trump supporters start physically and verbally attacking liberals like they've been actually doing to Trump supporters for the last 3 years.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:39 pm to tiggerthetooth
So they excluded cancel culture from their data set?
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:43 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
r/science is complete garbage. Too often social or political “science” gets a lot of attention there compared to actual scientific articles
Its sad how the actual scientific articles get 2.3k ish votes, and then a completely garbage political related article claiming to be "psychology" will get 30k+ votes.
Its like all the screaming libs bum rush every article on reddit related to hating Trump and smash the upvotes. Incredibly sad.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 9:02 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Its sad how the actual scientific articles get 2.3k ish votes, and then a completely garbage political related article claiming to be "psychology" will get 30k+ votes.
Its like all the screaming libs bum rush every article on reddit related to hating Trump and smash the upvotes. Incredibly sad.
Yep. Some of the articles are absolute junk with blatant errors. Not even from an academic journal (which itself was proven to be a low standard by that group of trolls).
Basically just write drivel claiming that soyboy cretins are smarter than and morally superior to everyone else and falsely claim it's "science" so you can't question it.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 9:29 pm to tiggerthetooth
I attended an Elisabeth Kubler-Ross lecture..
If still alive, she'd be in huge demand for the Libs that have lost their minds today, and are working through their different stages of grief.
If still alive, she'd be in huge demand for the Libs that have lost their minds today, and are working through their different stages of grief.
Posted on 3/28/20 at 9:29 pm to tiggerthetooth
Want to see bigotry and prejudice in our society today? Just have a look at the OP.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News