- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
Should they send mean letters to illegals and ask them to leave. 
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: you are a joke
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: you are a joke
1
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:00 pm to Placekicker
Did he have a second gun or something? I only hear a shot after that first agent takes the gun off his person @ 1:02
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:00 pm to Placekicker
quote:Correct
Now, why would Tim Walz and other Dems lie and try to create the narrative that this guy walked out of a donut shop and got shot in the face? Why are they so dishonest? It’s their rhetoric that is feeding these useful idiots. They are fanning the flames. They know these brainwashed drones believe anything they say and will act on it because- OMB. They are in open rebellion.
But that has nothing to do with this potential murder.
Dems lie. Yes.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:01 pm to Placekicker
Is it clear to you that this (soon to be) dead guy fired that first shot 5 seconds into the video?
Thats honestly the key to whether or not he deserved his fate. At least in my opinion.
The problem is that when the camera swings back to him it looks like hes holding a phone and not a gun. Which to me means that he didnt deserve to be shot.
Thats honestly the key to whether or not he deserved his fate. At least in my opinion.
The problem is that when the camera swings back to him it looks like hes holding a phone and not a gun. Which to me means that he didnt deserve to be shot.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:01 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I don’t see the need to appease assholes standing in the way of the government actually delivering on a promise made to the majority of voters.
Forget campaign promises, how about just enforcing the law? The democrats and their scumbag politicians have convinced themselves these aren’t real cops enforcing real laws. Most of them would never dream of interfering with beat cops the same way they are with DHS. Which is ironically the most backasswards take they could have. But here we are, and more people are going to die because people with savior complexes and a predilection for eating crayons aren’t happy about our immigration laws.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:02 pm to Placekicker
Because it works on effeminate men like SFP and Bunk who have volatile emotions and lurch from one outrage to the next. Enforcing immigration law is just too hard so we shouldn’t do it or my personal favorite which we are doing it wrong. If we would just send out strongly worded letters to criminals then they will peacefully leave and protesters wouldn’t care lol
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:03 pm to LSUBALLER
I don't know. He has something in his hand and then stuffs it into his waistband. However, the cops aren't really reacting like he just fired a shot. I never heard a first shot early.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:05 pm to Rip Torner
Did he not also pull something out in his hand after he was disarmed? A few things could have happened here. He could have pulled something out which was another weapon or could be seen as a weapon, they probably shot because of that. Or, it could have been the case that not every officer knew he was disarmed, but in the scuffle his shirt comes up revealing his holster. He could have reached for his holster. If you didn't know he was disarmed and you see his hand going there, that's probably why they shot.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:06 pm to SirWinston
quote:What are you seeing/hearing here?
Is it clear to you that this (soon to be) dead guy fired that first shot 5 seconds into the video?
The first shot I hear is just before the other shots.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:08 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
The first shot I hear is just before the other shots.
That shot seems to come after the fed walked away with what we assume to be the dead guy's sig.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to TDTOM
quote:
That shot seems to come after the fed walked away with what we assume to be the dead guy's sig.
We have made no such assumption.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to ReauxlTide222
At tbe beginning of the longer video there's a single gunshot a full 45 seconds before the dog pile and a nearly a full minute before the 10 shots
I assumed it was the (soon to be) dead guy who fired that initial shot but now im not confident
I assumed it was the (soon to be) dead guy who fired that initial shot but now im not confident
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to SirWinston
quote:
If the dead guy fired the first shot a full minute before the scuffle
Did that happen? I’ve not kept up the last few hours but I hadn’t heard that yet.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:10 pm to SirWinston
quote:
At tbe beginning of the longer video there's a single gunshot a full 45 seconds before the dog pile and a nearly a full minute before the 10 shots
What page? Any idea if the shot was aimed at someone or in the sky?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:11 pm to GhostofJackson
My X embed on page 40
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:11 pm to GhostofJackson
Yea, that's kind of what I think happened looking at all the video.
A cop said gun, which spooked all the officers at the exact millisecond, simultaneously the cop who said gun instinctively grabbed said gun and disarmed the guy, but it was too late as fractions of a second later rounds were going.
Had the guy not said gun and disarmed him, he's prob in custody and alive.
Had the guy said gun and left it, dead guy is still dead with the gun on the body and it's unquestionably justified.
I'm not a professional, and this is from my kitchen in Texas as I cook a chili, so take it for what it's worth.
A cop said gun, which spooked all the officers at the exact millisecond, simultaneously the cop who said gun instinctively grabbed said gun and disarmed the guy, but it was too late as fractions of a second later rounds were going.
Had the guy not said gun and disarmed him, he's prob in custody and alive.
Had the guy said gun and left it, dead guy is still dead with the gun on the body and it's unquestionably justified.
I'm not a professional, and this is from my kitchen in Texas as I cook a chili, so take it for what it's worth.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:11 pm to SirWinston
quote:I don’t hear this.
At tbe beginning of the longer video there's a single gunshot a full 45 seconds before the dog pile and a nearly a full minute before the 10 shots
I’m hoping the first shot of the “10” is the deceased.
But I don’t think it is.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
We have made no such assumption.
You have made no such assumption. There is a video from an angle where you can see the gun with a modified rear sight. I am not fluent in gun terms.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:14 pm to TDTOM
quote:
That shot seems to come after the fed walked away with what we assume to be the dead guy's sig.
Looked like a standard Glock 47 to me
Page 43 of 67
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News