- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:24 pm to Darnell5445
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:24 pm to Darnell5445
quote:What percentage of these were at the border?
How was Obama able to deport more illegals than Trump without having masked agents stopping citizens at random, going door to door, grabbing legal residents at their immigration checkins, breaking down doors without a judicial warrant?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:25 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
So now they are just to assume every person has as many guns as possible and any resisting should be met with death?
My position is that LE can't be compelled by Law to assume that an armed and combative suspect that is actively resisting arrest with physical force is in possession of only one firearm or other deadly weapon.
Once an armed suspect is actively fighting and resisting arrest, his threat to inflict death or great bodily harm on the LE agents is a continuing threat to inflict death or grievous bodily harm.
Once that legal threshold is reached by the unlawful violent actions of the suspect, the Law must allow LE a great amount of discretion to eliminate the threat using deadly force.
IF you are resisting arrest by fighting with officers AND you are carrying weapons on your person, YOU are actively presenting an imminent threat of inflicting death or grievous bodily harm on the arresting LE. Under those circumstances, the Law must allow great discretion to the arresting LE to eliminate the threat using force, including deadly force.
Is there something illogical about my line of thought here?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:26 pm to GeneralLee
Holy shite, how many more murders are they going to commit in this city?
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:26 pm to SnacknGold06
quote:
Police chief reported that the guy killed had a licensed conceal carry and no criminal record.
And that means?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:26 pm to Jbird
It would be a non lethal solution.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:27 pm to the808bass
quote:
And that means?
Just replying to the comment about planting a weapon.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:27 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Dude was fighting 5-6 armed federal officers . My hunch is on him having a death wish. Plus I’m not inclined to believe 5 ice would all decide at once to unload on someone in a public space while being filmed. Makes no sense. But I recognize how badly you want this to be a murder.
This is called projection. I made no definitive statements about what is going on here bc I don’t think the video is clear. You are the one who is admitting you aren’t using any actual evidence, but your own “hunch” and what you are “not inclined to believe.” I am just saying why rush to a conclusion?
You are clearly the one really invested in this ending a certain way. I don’t care
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:27 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Holy shite, how many more murders are they going to commit in this city?
When was the first one?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:28 pm to Houag80
quote:
It would be a non lethal solution.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:28 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Holy shite, how many more murders are they going to commit in this city?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:28 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I thought this board was pro 2A? Just not when it’s a liberal I guess
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:28 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
We've entered looney land.
quote:
I can link everyone to a relatively recent officer involved shooting, where the first thing the police reported to the media was the gun they found on the decedent. Unfortunately, once the body cam was released, you see the officer shot the guy when he was running away, nothing was in his hands, and the gun was not visible.
You have entered “I suck at Reading Comprehension” Land.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:29 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
This shooting looks really bad for ICE. The ICE guys look like fricking idiots and can’t get this guy apprehended on the ground with 6 dudes on him. And he’s clearly subdued getting his arse beat then gets a clip unloaded into him.
Time to pull the reigns back
Even if the first part is legit, the last thing that is needed is to pull the reigns back. Democrats brought the war, so blinking is what they expect and want. They will sacrifice a few to get their media lackeys to do the rest.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:29 pm to SnacknGold06
quote:
The agents approached and pushed/escorted him towards the sidewalk.
What matters is this: Once the suspect started fighting and resisting LE using any kind of physical force, that suspect broke the law and can legally be put under arrest.
Once you touch a police officer, you may very well have committed the crime of assault on a police officer.
If a police officer comes up to you and starts to try to move you out of the way DO NOT push the officer back. If you do, you have committed a crime.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:29 pm to ChiGator
quote:Does that mean I can act stupid?
I thought this board was pro 2A?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:29 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
You need LE experience to think 5 guys should be able to subdue 1 without deadly force?
Ummm you are defending a guy that was armed and resisting arrest….stop and think about that for a second.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:31 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Holy shite, how many more murders are they going to commit in this city?
They aren't murders, but as many as it takes.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:32 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Bonkers119
better put that helmet back on son and crack a snack pack
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
There’s 1,000 officer involved fatalities in the US every year. How many of those go like the one you wanna cite?
Very few. My point still stands that having a gun found isn’t immediately inculpatory evidence.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 12:32 pm to ChiGator
quote:
I thought this board was pro 2A? Just not when it’s a liberal I guess
What did you say about Ashli Babbit so I can compare your stance on law enforcement and deadly force?
Popular
Back to top



0







