re: New Court Filings Show Grand Jury Properly Voted On Indictment of Former FBI Head Comey

quote:

---

If the OP tells you a crow will fornicate with a buzzard, please, believe the OP.

---

Cheers, Timeoday. I really do appreciate you and your posts. I think we've done our best to illuminate our positions.

Friendly ornithological tip: we don't have "buzzards" in the United States. Our vultures were mistakenly called "buzzards" by European settlers because they looked like the old world buzzards.

quote:

---

Damn it’s getting to be a full time job down voting SFP.

---

Don't bother. I've learned the he doesn't believe anything he posts.

quote:

---

It's probably stupid to clarify legal points here, but

---

I think it’s a prudent discussion

First, I agree that Lemons is a solid attorney and his pleadings and oral arguments are well crafted.

Nevertheless, the magistrate judge’s observation is correct. There will be a new ruling of law. Russell and its progeny identify two non-defective amendments

(1) A scriveners error

It’s unlikely we fall into this bucket. There aren’t typos. There is a procedural issue that must be discussed. That is, Halligan didn’t merely type James Coney or write “Teh”

(2) A lessening of charges on a fully voted on indictment

That is, the government presented ABCD. The GJ voted and approved ABCD. ABCD was presented to the clerk and the court proceeded on ABCD. The government then chooses to amend to only proceed on ABC

This is distinguishable. The government presented XYZ. The issue at law will be if the GJ can separately vote for X then Y and then Z or may it only vote on the transaction XYZ (e.g. like a veto compared to a line item veto). If they can only vote on the transaction then no bill was returned. If they may separately vote on each count, a true bill was returned and the foreman signed the bill reflecting the will of the GJ (e.g. he resolved the hanging chad)

Personally, I think the will of the GJ should control but there is a question of law

quote:

---

If you say a buzzard is not a buzzard but a vulture, I will take that to the grave!!

---

Thanks, Brother.

And...through the process of our discussion, I think that the Court WON'T dismiss on the technical issue with the indictment:)

I know you do. Let's both hope no more time is wasted so what is to be can get here as soon as it can.

quote:

---

Despite the media's best efforts to misreport and cover for their favorite deep-state actor, James Comey.

---

That would be Shitty Schiff

No doubt about that. Get some meat on those bones!!

quote:

---

I don't recall you ever criticizing any of the Democrat operatives like the weasel Andrew Weissman

---

You mean the guy who basically ran the Mueller Investigation that exonerated Trump? No, I didn't criticize that exoneration.

quote:

---

Your lack of honesty has already been noted. We didn't need you to prove it any further.

---

Your #1 goal on this board is to obfuscate and deflect for dems and everyone knows it. Me pointing that out doesn’t make me dishonest.

quote:

---

I couldn't imagine living a live without honor like that.

---

And yet, you won't even give President Trump credit for securing the Southern border. Dude, there's very little if any "honor" residing inside of you.