- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:43 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
BeeFense5
First TDS nerd to comment in the thread.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:44 pm to beaux duke
quote:
bleaux dudes
Second TDS nerd to comment in the thread.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:46 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
This seems like a good thread to save and come back to a few months down the line.
When Trump wins and proves you panican TDS nerds to be the losers you are... AGAIN. I agree. Save it and we'll check back in and laugh.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:47 pm to EastWestConnection
quote:
Yeah I heard they were 10 minutes away from having. But for real this time!
So, you believe the Iranian regime I take it.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:50 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
frick that shite. Regime change or bust. If we don’t get that then all we’ve really done is waste a bunch of bullets
That’s where I find myself.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:55 pm to Techdave
quote:
Considering every administration previously (Trump episode 1 as well) allowed this problem to fester, it was time to do something.
And the Epstein files were certainly a catalyst for that
Posted on 3/12/26 at 12:57 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
You have to go all in on regime change now or this will make Iran much more of an adversary in the future.
How’s our long term success rate on regime changes historically? Is it over 0%?
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:02 pm to Techdave
quote:
Gains support for our cause. If we have to go back and hit them again, it won't just be us and Isreal anymore. We definitely need that support if a ground war were to take place, to share the load of casualties, so it's not just Americans.
Are “preventative wars” constitutional? Seems to set a pretty insane precedent and also insanely aggressive. How’d all this work out in Iraq?
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:04 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:Pooooosie on deck I see.
This is way more serious. It's potential life or death for hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people.
quote:Kinda contradictory to the comment above don't ya think?
Now it's time to be savage and wipe those mullah islamic terrorist MFers off the face of the earth once and for all.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:10 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
And the Epstein files were certainly a catalyst for that
You dudes are pathetically desperate. lmao
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:11 pm to Techdave
I am interested to see what they do to stop Iran from blowing up ships in the strait. We have to find a better way to handle drones than what we are currently doing.
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:13 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Are “preventative wars” constitutional? Seems to set a pretty insane precedent and also insanely aggressive. How’d all this work out in Iraq?
In the end, the Iraq war achieved the desired results with a lot more casualties than necessary.
This is results and almost no casualties. (for us anyhow)
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:15 pm to Techdave
quote:
This is results and almost no casualties. (for us anyhow)
Well we haven’t achieved much of anything so far and we have taken casualties. We need to keep pressing to ensure an Iran with a regime that won’t fund its traditional proxies and won’t threaten to close the strait of Hormuz.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:19 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
Well we haven’t achieved much of anything so far and we have taken casualties. We need to keep pressing to ensure an Iran with a regime that won’t fund its traditional proxies and won’t threaten to close the strait of Hormuz.
Estimates right now say we have hit 5000+ targets in Iran. Killed most of their senior leadership, buried nuclear facilities again, sunk every boat they had, decimated their entire air force, hit every military base they have (or had).
But yeah no achievements?
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:25 pm to diat150
quote:
I am interested to see what they do to stop Iran from blowing up ships in the strait. We have to find a better way to handle drones than what we are currently doing.
I'm curious to see how this plays out as well.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:34 pm to Techdave
quote:
But yeah no achievements?
The achievement that matters is having a government in place that we can manipulate, whether that’s the current Ayatollah’s regime or a new one
Posted on 3/12/26 at 1:42 pm to IMSA_Fan
quote:
The achievement that matters is having a government in place that we can manipulate, whether that’s the current Ayatollah’s regime or a new one
That sounds great and all. But let's be honest, after Afghanistan and Iraq, can we really expect that to be simple? Insurgents know the playbook to grind out a war for a decade or more, forcing us to lose support for the war, then they get to keep being shitheads after we leave.
Trump's approach is to beat them into submission with very little loss of American lives, turn everyone else against them when the shut down the oil shipments in the gulf and fire missiles on their neighbors.
I think Trumps approach is worth a shot before ever considering a ground war.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 2:06 pm to Techdave
unfortunately they are still putting up a fight so its not nearly as flawless as you think. And the longer they keep fighting and having a supreme leader isnt going to bode well.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 2:10 pm to Techdave
we whooping arse but can't really compare a campaign that is using only air and naval assets to ones that had ground forces involved.
Popular
Back to top


0




