NBC tells Gillette to hold their double soy mocha latte

I don't even know what that means. Seriously I can understand quantum physics better than I can understand whatever the hell these people are coming up with nowadays.

That’s because definitions in quantum physics aren’t changing in order to push an agenda.

Berlatsky sure is an interesting name.

I have no idea how anyone can have any doubt about these people's ultimate goals.

They don't even have to hide it anymore, they are flat out telling you to your face what they are attempting to do.

quote:

---

---

quote:

---

Noah Berlatsky is a freelance writer. He edits the online comics-and-culture website The Hooded Utilitarian and is the author of the book "Wonder Woman: Bondage and Feminism in the Marston/Peter Comics, 1941-1948."

---

Naaaahhhh. I never would have guessed it.

I won't even pretend to know the political ideology to which he adheres.

This is the author of that rubbish. He appears to suffer from “No T.”

Edit: someone beat me to it.

Punchable.
Several times.

They're literally going to miss us something awful after we're gone.

I did something crazy and actually read the article in question

LINK

My take - most of it is just virtue signaling

Some snippets:

quote:

---

At the same time, though, the school is a private school. Sending kids to private school is an option you only have if you have a certain amount of money. In paying for him to go to that school, we were at least partially abetting a system that benefits more affluent people. And affluent people in the U.S. are often (though not always) white. We sent our son to a school that taught and encouraged anti-racism. But teaching people to be anti-racist doesn't necessarily address the structure of racism itself. In fact, racist structures often determine who does and does not have access to these kinds of educational opportunities.

---

Feeling guilty about sending your kids to a private school and questioning if it might be racist is silly

Unless you sent them there with the explicit intent of keeping them away from minorities why would you even ponder such nonsense?

quote:

---

Some parents, Hagerman found, preferred to keep race unspoken. Families she interviewed in a wealthy, conservative suburb, for example, tended to avoid the topic of race with their children. "They adhered to a color blind way of thinking," Hagerman told me. "They would say that race doesn't matter, or that we're beyond race."

---

Seems like a reasonable stance and far better than what you would expect say 60 years ago

quote:

---

Yet, as Hagerman told me, "all of these families in their own ways were participating in the reproduction of racial inequality." Children were sent to private school, or when they went to public school benefited from private tutors or enrichment classes. Even community service can reproduce racist ideas. It's hard to see people as equals when you always have power over them, or when your primary experience with them involves giving them charity.

---

So basically no matter what you do you're racist

quote:

---

Hagerman’s findings do offer at least one glimmer of hope. White children, she found, don't automatically reproduce the racial ideology of their parents. One white boy she interviewed, for example, disliked his private school in part because he felt the children were too privileged and too racially isolated.

---

Or how about the more obvious in your face observation? If one of the "racist" elements of his story is that parents are teaching their kids to be "color blind" I'd say that racial relations have come a long way. Things are so much less racist now than even the 1980s it's incredible.

quote:

---

He and people like him

---

Juden?

quote:

---

White children are everywhere, but their whiteness is too often invisible and unspoken.

---

quote:

---

The best possible future should include a society that isn't organized around racism.

---