- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NATO signs off on F-16 usage against and inside of Russia
Posted on 2/23/24 at 8:13 pm to BayouBlitz
Posted on 2/23/24 at 8:13 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Good. frick Putin. He started this shite.
You people are so very short sighted and stupid
0
Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:32 am to Night Vision
Not only does this add fuel to the fire, but also will make no difference. The jets will be shot out of the sky. The weapons systems, on both sides, have rendered air attacks non existent.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:47 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
Good. frick Putin. He started this shite
Nope, Obama started it with help from the shrub.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 9:51 am to Night Vision
Unless there is a really badass plan for SEAD then every single F-16 is getting shot out of the sky.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:13 am to bamadontcare
quote:
Did you raise Hell about that. Those Tutsis never hurt anybody
Actually the European powers put the Tutsis in charge of the governments when they left. The Tutsis were the minority and treated the Hutus like garbage.
After decades of mistreatment, no doubt through DEI, affirmative action, me too, boys in girls locker rooms, bathrooms for every sexual deviant known to man and some not, lgpqurt@23@#, the Hutus had enough and explained FAFO to them.
By the way, you should not use Dominion to do your counting.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:17 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
There are two risks. One, these aircraft will be have to be serviced by western ground crews. Presumably contractors. And they will be targeted by the Russians, which puts us closer to a direct fight. The other risk, which is related, is if NATO tries to operate these from outside Ukraine. Because of airfield issues, to simplify the maintenance logistics, and to protect the mechanics. Because then the Russians may attack where they’re based.
I have no doubt we have had 100s of "observers" in Ukraine for years.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:22 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
BayouBlitz
Is it because he is a “former” communist that you hate him?
I dare say if he were the leader of the USSR, as opposed to Russia, that your goose-stepping self would be rather infatuated with him.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:27 am to SirWinston
quote:
The thing I don't trust is the west to actually end it. I feel like they want to keep this going for a long as possible and kill as many Russians as possible which is grotesque.
The west doesnt care about dead Russians. It cares about spending and the kickbacks the MIC sends them.
This war is still going on because the grift is still available.
MONEY MONEY MONEY
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:29 am to VOR
quote:
How do you like your borscht, Yuri?
Coming from a goose-stepping communazi like yourself, I find your post to be lacking in self awareness.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:30 am to SirWinston
Grounds wars are slow. Their destruction of key towns along he combat line will eventually force a collapse. Look at the Spanish Civil War. It took a while for things to fall apart for the Republicans.
Putin wins the political war but loses prestige for the Russian state.
Putin wins the political war but loses prestige for the Russian state.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:31 am to Night Vision
Time to cut a desl; no Russian planes in Ukraine and no Ukrainian planes in Russia.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:32 am to jimmy the leg
You truly don’t know what you’re talking about.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:34 am to Bass Tiger
Another Putin apologist
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:37 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Wrong!
The EU/NATO and the illegitimate regime set the table for a Russian invasion of Ukraine because they displayed incompetence and weakness.
Ah, the old "might makes right" argument. Very Machiavellan, and antithetical to the principles upon which this country was founded. You shouldn't complain about Biden being a corrupt shite (he is), but according to your logic, if he has the power to do so, then it's justified.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:38 am to VOR
Well hopefully they shoot em down in quick order.
I'm beginning to worry about a nuclear false flag. It appears our government is staffed by a bunch of Dr. Srangeloves and General Turgidsons.
I'm beginning to worry about a nuclear false flag. It appears our government is staffed by a bunch of Dr. Srangeloves and General Turgidsons.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:44 am to Night Vision
Dumb bastards want WWIII.
whether he said it or not...
whether he said it or not...
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:45 am to VOR
quote:
You truly don’t know what you’re talking about.
You truly are an idiot. Your post history definitely paints you as a goose-stepper.
Given access to that, I laugh at your deflection.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 10:57 am to Night Vision
I hope Putin shoots every single one of them down.
Posted on 2/24/24 at 11:59 am to LsuNav
Winning is winning, Russia will be more powerful in political terms after the war, and it will by physically stronger. Their economy and armed forces will be stronger because of what has happened.
I like your comparison to Spain though. I think Ukrainian will collapse the way the Communists did there.
I like your comparison to Spain though. I think Ukrainian will collapse the way the Communists did there.
This post was edited on 2/24/24 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 2/24/24 at 12:00 pm to RiverCityTider
They’re not well educated, and they’re fairly stupid unfortunately.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News