Started By
Message

re: NATO readies 300,000 troops for European Defense Against Russia

Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by 1984Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Apr 2006
7730 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

NATO is preparing for a potential conflict with Russia by developing 'land corridors' to quickly deploy 300,000 US troops to the European frontlines.

So NATO is preparing with US troops? And people wonder why Trump wanted to bail on NATO?
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

So since there are signals indicating that Russia might be up to something naughty in Eastern Europe...you would prefer we sit on our asses and do nothing (and when a Russian invasion comes, say, "whoa, shoot, guess we should have been more prepared, oh well, too late now").


There are no signals. There have never been signals. It's hard to believe anyone falls this pathetic narrative from DC.
Posted by Feelthebarn
Lower Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
3748 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:05 pm to
Are you fricking retarded? Or do you think everyone else is retarded? Which is it? Because Russia isn't going to invade the US
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77760 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:05 pm to
quote:


Sounds like Biden doesn't want a November election to be held.


Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:09 pm to
Russia will not attack a NATO country unless NATO attacks Russia

NATO is getting dangerously close to attacking Russia, even though they're already doing it via proxy.

The US war mongers want a direct conflict. They'll do ANYTHING to get it.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:10 pm to
"Dude the Russians are not invading anything other than Ukraine"

LINK

LINK

Might as well send some troops there to make sure they know - hands off.
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
10411 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:12 pm to
Western powers have perceived Russia as a boogeyman since at least the 16th century.

It's always been in the interest of governments to "protect" its citizens from foreign threats, real or otherwise.

In the present case, Western propagandists spent months mocking the incompetent and outdated Russian army, then harrowing tales of their war crimes, and now their planned invasion of Poland.

I got no love for Pooty Poot, but the pearl clutching rings a little hollow at this point.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 9:25 pm
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5917 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

"Dude the Russians are not invading anything other than Ukraine"

LINK /

LINK /

Might as well send some troops there to make sure they know - hands off.




Post something from the non-fiction part of the internet.
Posted by Marye
Member since Oct 2020
549 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

And... it didn't say US troops, it said NATO troops.


Reading comprehension much?

"NATO is preparing for a potential conflict with Russia by developing 'land corridors' to quickly deploy 300,000 US troops to the European frontlines."
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131601 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:23 pm to
This is fake news

We have been war planning like this for wars against russia and china since WW2

Call me when we are actually moving troops to the front
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47623 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:28 pm to
Nato huh? That would make this war involving at least 34 nations on three continents. Yep, that's World War 3. All because the American MIC wants you to believe that Russia has the military might to take over the whole of Europe.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
8368 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:29 pm to
kill off all of the white european soldiers and leave behind the migrants to breed the women while the soy boys left behind are cucked. all apart of the soros plan
Posted by Spaniard
Pine Belt
Member since Apr 2011
1198 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:31 pm to
Natural resources,natural resources,natural resources,natural resources.

It’s always about money. A certain group wants control of it all and uses the USA blood to go get it. The fact that people fall for this same playbook time and again gives me no hope for the already enslaved.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
14292 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Russia can render each of those ports and corridors unusable within 30 minutes. US would have to mass troops in a way that precludes Russia doing this. I think they are just letting Ukraine get totally wiped out then NATO troops will be sent in as a 'peacekeeping' force, they'll tell Russia to leave, Russia will not leave, and NATO will attack. I'm not sure we can achieve suppression of air defense over there and if that does not happen, it will get really, really ugly for our forces. Every port, railway, highway, airport etc can be and will be targeted by Russia and it will probably get destroyed. If this starts, getting anything into theater may be impossible, and that means defeat. That would be an ugly withdraw and a bitter pill, not to mention a lot of dead Americans. The war party in DC is an evil, worthless, and traitorous group of people. Also, if this kicks off, Russia will take out our satellites, so you can say goodbye to most of modern society. We may do the same to them but their military is in better shape to deal with that than ours. This will mean our internet is gone and the government will have a stranglehold on everything from information to commerce, banking, fuel, etc. And they'll probably claim they need to confiscate all the guns and ammo for the war effort as well. All of this could happen before the election. It's going to be a bumpy five months.


Jesus Christ dude are you a military advisor to Putin or something?


Everything you just stated is YOUR completely uneducated opinion. Stop trying to act like you know what you’re talking about
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77760 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

And that's, on average, less than 10k troops per NATO country.

In what universe has the burden for NATO been shared equally across all member states?
Posted by TigersBucs
Lake Charles
Member since Oct 2009
1814 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

So since there are signals indicating that Russia might be up to something naughty in Eastern Europe...you would prefer we sit on our asses and do nothing (and when a Russian invasion comes, say, "whoa, shoot, guess we should have been more prepared, oh well, too late now").


They would rather let him run through Europe like the Nazis did. They are too stupid to understand history could repeat itself.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65876 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:37 pm to
When did Russia threaten NATO?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63089 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

So since there are signals indicating that Russia might be up to something naughty in Eastern Europe...you would prefer we sit on our asses and do nothing (and when a Russian invasion comes, say, "whoa, shoot, guess we should have been more prepared, oh well, too late now").

Reagan remains right. Peace through strength.



retard
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
77145 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

So since there are signals indicating that Russia might be up to something naughty in Eastern Europe...you would prefer we sit on our asses and do nothing
Yes actually. I would. Let them defend themselves
Posted by SoFlaGuy
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Apr 2020
3219 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 3:47 pm to
Sounds like Tucker was on to something. Odd how almost every “conspiracy theory” comes to be factual.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram