- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: National Group Uncovers Real-Time Democrat Election Fraud – HERE’S HOW THEY DID IT
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:25 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:25 pm to David_DJS
quote:
It's not a small task to accumulate, fill out and mail tens of thousands of ballots.
I’m not sure it’s that big of a task. Technology could make it into a 5 person job. Segmenting the job could make it into non-fraud in the individual steps. “You’re delivering the ballots of old people who can’t make it to the post office.” “You’re filling out test ballots.” “You’re printing labels for people that we’re targeting for advertising.”
1
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:28 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Not talking about ballot harvesting or electronic frickery, but where creating tens of thousands of ballots is the cheat I've often wondered - who's doing this work? It's not a small task to accumulate, fill out and mail tens of thousands of ballots. Hard to imagine this can be accomplished without a well-funded team (or teams) so the question is, could a well-funded team get this work done without leaving tracks or never having a defection?
That's why there needs to be undercover actions taken and the development of confidential informants.
An old friend exposed a lot of fraud in Maryland a couple of decades ago. It always happened in deep blue precincts. A dem would switch their party affiliation and then serve as the GOP observer. Ballot stuffing then proceeded at will.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
The reason I know that, is that we have video of fraud happening. And people don’t believe it.
I'm not doubting you, but so I know - what are you referring to?
I've read on this site dozens of times over the last couple weeks about ballot harvesting in Arizona during the midterms, but the video I've seen posted doesn't show it.
I believe voter fraud is a real thing because of some statistics that fell out of 2020, and because Dems have fricked up the system as they have for a reason.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m not sure it’s that big of a task. Technology could make it into a 5 person job.
Honest question - how?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 3:34 pm to David_DJS
Not to mention the paper trail of thousands of ballots being returned as undeliverable.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:02 pm to David_DJS
What’s the steps?
It’s not a nuclear bomb assembly.
Is it 4 steps?
5?
How much can you automate?
Are you envisioning someone actually filling in a ballot?
It’s not a nuclear bomb assembly.
Is it 4 steps?
5?
How much can you automate?
Are you envisioning someone actually filling in a ballot?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Not to mention the paper trail of thousands of ballots being returned as undeliverable.
What paper trail?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
What paper trail?
The 31,000 envelopes being returned by the post office.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
The author didn’t say where they did it. He said it happened in one county.
quote:
Our teams in Wisconsin and Florida are finding this scam by the truckload
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:36 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The 31,000 envelopes being returned by the post office.
To where?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
Are you envisioning someone actually filling in a ballot?
I don't know what to envision. That's why I asked. I'm not suggesting it can't be done, but nobody has explained it beyond conceptually.
I'm trying to see how a handful of people, working autonomously, can steal an election without leaving behind clear evidence of their work.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:44 pm to the808bass
County Clerks office most likely
Posted on 11/30/22 at 4:50 pm to David_DJS
I've seen it suggested the Post Office was in on it. These ballots are moved around like ghosts in the machine.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:24 pm to Auburn1968
Let me help you. Let me explain why the voter fraud/vaccine death
data you are reading does not mean what you think it does.
At some point I will be forced to point out how stupid you
must be to not understand the truth.
I’m doing this for your own good.
data you are reading does not mean what you think it does.
At some point I will be forced to point out how stupid you
must be to not understand the truth.
I’m doing this for your own good.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:32 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Wouldn't the person then be able to dispute that they already voted and cast a provisional ballot?
...and if that voter was a Republican, that vote would have been netted out. If that voter was a Democrat, it effectively counts twice.
This is how you get 5000 voters voting in multiple counties. It's not because voters actually go vote twice...its' because harvested ballots from the old county role combine with actual voting in the current county.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:47 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Is there a report that shows how many returned mail items go back to the clerk’s office? Would such a report detail exactly what those mail items were?
If so, who controls the report and the data used to create that report?
Just asking questions.
Remember….
By any means necessary is why many people are suspicious. That was the mantra. I believed them and still do.
If so, who controls the report and the data used to create that report?
Just asking questions.
Remember….
By any means necessary is why many people are suspicious. That was the mantra. I believed them and still do.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:52 pm to David_DJS
quote:
without leaving behind clear evidence of their work.
You’re dithering here.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:54 pm to Auburn1968
I have not read the whole thing but, I am not sure I can handle what I expected I thought they would do.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 5:59 pm to Auburn1968
A ballot system is completely different than a voting system.
With a vote you have reasonable certainty that a real person has communicated his actual intent.
With a ballot system you may or may not have that. But the point is that there is a greatly reduced confidence that that occured.
With a vote you have reasonable certainty that a real person has communicated his actual intent.
With a ballot system you may or may not have that. But the point is that there is a greatly reduced confidence that that occured.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:00 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3.
Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
National Change of Address Database, NCOA, will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine – except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database – the one that was changed – then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
No standing
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News