Name another civilized country that allows semi-automatics to be sold as consumer durables

And who determine's who gets these licenses? Maybe they make it to if you've ever had any kind of traffic ticket you not eligible for the license. Maybe they say only people born in the 6th week of a month can apply. So now millions of people are criminals over night cause they can't apply for license. Maybe, just maybe, The governent should worry about the reason so many feel they need to carry a gun. Maybe someone who doesn't represent me shouldn't try to tell me what is best for me. And maybe, just maybe, gun grabbers are dîckless bitches. Actually, no maybe to that last part.

quote:

---

You need a license to drive a car but you do not need a license to own a gun!

---

Owning a car is not guaranteed by the US Constitution.

quote:

---

You need a license to drive a car but you do not need a license to own a gun!

---

You have a constitutional right to own a gun. You do not to own a vehicle. Driving is a privilege, not a right.

Name another country that has been as powerful as the US since the invention of semi auto guns?

Let's use your argument. Name all the places where citizens can't own guns. China, North Korea, Nazi Germany, Zimbabwe, etc, etc. You know why? Because it's hard to oppress the citizens when they shoot back. Are there negatives? You betcha. But I will take them compared to the alternative.

quote:

---

Seriously, no other nation in North America, North and Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand (basically the civilized world )

---

So Asia isn't civilized? No parts of Africa? nothing in South America? Eastern Europe? So your saying only the whitest nations are civilized. Man you're a Racists!!!

Everything else you said was really stupid and you're a horrible alter who gives Potato's a bad name. Carry on.

Please tell me you're trolling. My 12 yo has more common sense than you, shite dude think!
First, most gun violence is done with ghost guns. These guns ce to us from other countries by illegal means. They have no serial numbers to trace. They will be here regardless of any gun law. Now , the bad guys, crooks, robbers , thieves have these guns. If we didn't have any for protection what would you think would happen?

1/10, you need to up your troll game.

quote:

---

Without it, our lives would be far better

---

I have a feeling you are just a troll, but I'll bite anyways.

The fact of the matter is you are a complete and utter hypocrite and you won't come to terms with it. You absolutely love guns even the black machine gun looking scary ones that you see on the news. You love them alot, but may not realize it or admit it.

If a bad guy or group of them enter your property looking to cause you harm, what would be your first reaction? My guess is you call 911, so that other more masculine men than you can show up with those scary machines you don't like.

How do you suppose the government, FBI, ATF go around rounding up every citizens scary looking guns? You don't suppose they themselves use scary black guns in doing so?

See the 2nd ammendment is the one thing that has really made America more unique than any other country. It is for one, the reason the Japanese, German, and Soviets never considered invading the homeland.

It is also served as a check on the government from them stripping other rights away. They can't ultimately line us up for camps, unless they do take guns first. That is the reason all the most notorious dictators (Hitler, Stalin, Mussulini, Mao) all tool guns first before committing mass atrocities.

Most Americans live in an insulated bubble and just think all the bad things that have happened everywhere else in the world throughout history, some how is uniquely immune from happening to them. And they are as wrong as it gets, and will most likely be the first ones in the line for the firing squads.

More than likely you want to ban guns, because you don't feel comfortable yourself taking care of your own self or family and would rather outsource that basic function of being a man, to some other men. In the process you want to take away that right from other men who do not want to rely on an incompetent and corrupt government to keep them and their families safe, when they are plenty capable themselves.

There are always unfortunate consequences to freedom. Mass shootings as rare as they are, are unfortunate. There are actually a ton of practical solutions to reduce them, but no one wants to discuss them anymore because all mass shootings are anymore are political opportunities to strip people's rights. No one wants to discuss real solutions.