- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MSNBC currently airing this drivel
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:51 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:51 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
It's a much larger round in the AR as well.
You misspelled smaller.
1
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:52 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
It's a much larger round in the AR as well
A 9mm fires a .35 cal 115gr +/- bullet. The AR typically described by MSM fires a .22 cal 55hr +/- bullet.
Which one is bigger?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:52 pm to Pechon
quote:
Oh God, wait till they hear about the FN Five-seven.
It will be like election night all over again.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:52 pm to culsutiger
Lol.
9mm bullet is definitely smaller if by smaller he mean bigger.
9mm bullet is definitely smaller if by smaller he mean bigger.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:56 pm to Kriegschwein
It's a pistol, everybody knows pistols shoot little bitty bullets and rifles shoot big bullets
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:56 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
don’t understand the point?
The trauma surgeon is pointing out how the bullet from an AR15 destroys any tissue within a certain radius of the bullet trajectory due to cavitation which is why wounds from that bullet often equire multiple surgeries to survive compared to usually 1 surgury from a 9mm wound.
An AR 15 round need only come near a vital organ or artery to be lethal. Direct hits are not necessary.
It's a fact, so I'm not sure why there would be objections on here.
How it applies to "gun control" is a different convo all together.
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:57 pm to Kriegschwein
quote:
9mm bullet is definitely smaller if by smaller he mean bigger.
Yeah, I was too befrickled by his statement to respond...maybe he works for MSNBC?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Where’s Superman when you need him?
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:58 pm to BobBoucher
Well we all know this about gun control. It’s not like the ballistics of the rounds is “news”
Posted on 2/26/18 at 5:59 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
ballistic velocity
What the frick is this?
quote:
makes its down range impact more effective and lethal
Not necessarily. Faster can be less effective, depending upon bullet type.
quote:
more accurate over long distances
False. Velocity does not determine accuracy. Makes a flatter ballistic arc, but does not make it more accurate.
quote:
whats your point.
That you’re an idiot who is talking as if you’re an authority on a subject that you obviously have no clue about. Leave this one to the grown folk.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:00 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
The trauma surgeon is pointing out how the bullet from an AR15 destroys any tissue within a certain radius of the bullet trajectory due to cavitation
What is left out here is that ALL bullets cause cavitation.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:00 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Well we all know this about gun control. It’s not like the ballistics of the rounds is “news”
Bingo. Every single narrative angle will be explored in the crusade to ban anything and everything possible.
It's not about the guns, it's about the control.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:00 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Force = MASSx Acceleration
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:01 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Well we all know this about gun control. It’s not like the ballistics of the rounds is “news”
Agreed. It's how "they" justify a ban that should be the point we're debating.
The lethality is pretty well established. And they should list all ammo that is just as lethal so they can be clear about what they are trying to ban.
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:02 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
It's a fact, so I'm not sure why there would be objections on here.
Probably because fps is fairly meaningless in that context without other ballistic information.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:02 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
An AR 15 round need only come near a vital organ or artery to be lethal. Direct hits are not necessary.
It's a fact, so I'm not sure why there would be objections on here.
How it applies to "gun control" is a different convo all together.
They're really gonna shite their pants when they take a look at cavitation from full size rifle rounds. You know, the rounds that they say are perfectly fine because they're just used to hunt with.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:04 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
They're really gonna shite their pants when they take a look at cavitation from full size rifle rounds. You know, the rounds that they say are perfectly fine because they're just used to hunt with.
Exactly. Hence my point in a post just above this. It's not about the AR15. It's about the round, and if you want a ban, be clear about what you're seeking to ban.
This post was edited on 2/26/18 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
My Weatherby .257 shoots at over 3500 feet per second. Hope this genius reporter never understands how stupid her talking point is.
Posted on 2/26/18 at 6:05 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
And those velocities matter not if you're firing at someone 50 feet away. No one can dodge either bullet. The distinction is stupid and irrlevant.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News