- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mother of the 10 year old rape victim is pregnant by her child’s rapist.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:25 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:25 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Who reported to the authorities on 6/22?
Columbus, Ohio, police said they were made aware of the girl's rape on June 22 through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother. Dr. Bernard has said she was contacted about the abortion five days later on June 27.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I did not see anything about where he was arrested. Again, please link the source.
I’m going to ask again. How did the news media find the mother of the child?
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:29 pm to FlexDawg
Poverty can be a horror show.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:29 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
My best guess (and this is not even an inference from available information, just a guess) is that they sought an abortion in Ohio, and that Ohio provider referred the case to the authorities.
You think the mom asked for an abortion for her daughter? I don’t. I think the social worker told them to get an abortion.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:32 pm to FlexDawg
so the mother allowed the rapist to have access to the daughter!!
probably assisted the guy in the rape as well.
has any of the authority/law enforcement investigated this yet?
As The World Turns
probably assisted the guy in the rape as well.
has any of the authority/law enforcement investigated this yet?
As The World Turns
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:32 pm to the808bass
The doctor put a political agenda 1st. The safety and health of the girl 2nd. Based on the referral for abortion in neighboring state and then waiting to report per law.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:36 pm to the808bass
quote:
You are far from immune to this. So don’t get too far up on that high horse.
Hank’s governing motto on this board: do as he says, not as he does.
This quote didn’t age well:
quote:
Too many are too lazy to research and learn.
Mr. Peabody needs to get back to us after he researches the history of the age of consent in the United States.

Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:41 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Well when the goal posts move then yes, part of the story was false, but I'm referring to 808 and those like him that said every part of the story was false, like the 10-yr old didn't exist
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:41 pm to the808bass
quote:i do not recall seeing that question. I do not know the answer. My best guess is that it came out as part of the indictment/arraignment process.
I did not see anything about where he was arrested. Again, please link the source.quote:
I’m going to ask again. How did the news media find the mother of the child?
For the THIRD time, what is the source of your assertion that Fuentes was arrested in the child’s home.
This post was edited on 7/17/22 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:53 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
yes, part of the story was false
You act as if this is some small, insignificant detail. This “part” of the story was the primary claim of the narrative as it was initially packaged by the MSM. After the long, documented history of the MSM contorting facts and omitting key details to fit a political agenda, is it any wonder people were suspicious of the initial story?

This post was edited on 7/18/22 at 5:28 am
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:54 pm to the808bass
quote:I prefer to work from evidence. The evidence to date shows Dr. Bernard (Indiana) stating that the patient was referred by an Ohio physician. See Indiana Star article. The LEO testimony at the arraignment is that the referral was on 27-June.
You think the mom asked for an abortion for her daughter? I don’t. I think the social worker told them to get an abortion.
We do not know yet whether the family first had contact with Ohio social workers or with the Ohio physician. Either is possible, but the timing (22-June police report vs 27-June physician referral) suggests to me that the mother FIRST went to Ohio protective services, who referred her to the Ohio physician, who referred her to Dr Bernard in Indiana
This is also consistent with the Dobbs release on 26-June. The Ohio doctor would initially have believed that she could help the child (pre-Dobbs), then Dobbs came down. The doc played it safe and referred the case to Indiana.
Just now, I read the fact that is most troubling about all of this. Apparently the mother says the attack happened on 12-May. Yet she apparently involved no governmental entity until 22-June.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:57 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:What are you babbling about? I provided the numbers in 1920, and I asked that other poster what authority he had to support his claim that the data was wrong and that New Mexico retained a ridiculously early age of consent until 70 years after the data I provided.
Toomer Deplorable
He failed to provide any such information. Why? Because he was wrong.
This post was edited on 7/17/22 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I prefer to work from evidence.
Shut the frick up.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 1:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
For the THIRD time, what is the source of your assertion that Fuentes was arrested in the child’s home.
Because he lives with them. And the media found the mother from the arrest warrant. Any other stupid questions?
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:01 pm to the808bass
quote:It’s OK. I can see why requests for actual evidence cause you some concerns.
I prefer to work from evidence.quote:
Shut the frick up.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:01 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
Well when the goal posts move then yes, part of the story was false, but I'm referring to 808 and those like him that said every part of the story was false, like the 10-yr old didn't exist
Yeah. I initially thought the whole story was made up because it was obviously false in many parts. Nothing about that has changed.
It is false in many parts.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:02 pm to AggieHank86
frick off. You spend 18 pages making shite up out of whole cloth.
I point out that the media found the mother from the arrest warrant of the perp and I’m the one making stuff up.
I point out that the media found the mother from the arrest warrant of the perp and I’m the one making stuff up.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:03 pm to the808bass
quote:maybe, and maybe not. My experience with protective services is otherwise.
Because he lives with them
They would’ve required him to move out immediately on 22-June, or taken the child from the mother. Maybe they do things differently in Ohio.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:05 pm to the808bass
quote:take a deep breath. Maybe a drink.
I point out that the media found the mother from the arrest warrant of the perp and I’m the one making stuff up.
I didn’t accuse you of making anything up. I simply asked to see where you got the information.
Grow up.
Posted on 7/17/22 at 2:07 pm to AggieHank86
If this incest rape had happened in Mexico with illegal aliens there the whole lot would be deported right away.
But here we allow it to fester to a political battle.
Ridiculous.
But here we allow it to fester to a political battle.
Ridiculous.
Popular
Back to top


0






