Started By
Message

re: More Military Expansion---will we EVER quit spending too much??--Space Force

Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:25 pm to
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29008 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:25 pm to
JBE is offering Tax Credits to our Space Force!

Think about that for a minute!
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
35786 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:31 pm to
Jeez, Trump is just trying to create a safe space for you.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

You don’t think the founding fathers knew the danger of the federal government becoming too powerful?


Jefferson understood completely.

You obviously do not.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I guess to summarize my point...

Your basic claim is that Republicans are contradicting themselves. However, you can agree with defense spending, but disagree on welfare spending since the constitution states that one of the federal governments responsibilities is maintaining a military.

Now that doesn’t mean the government should have an unlimited budget, but there is no contradiction in the above statement.

Do you agree?


No I do not. How did you come to any of those conclusions?
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8858 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:40 pm to


When these show up you will thank Trump.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

How did you come to any of those conclusions?
basic logic man.

He explained it extremely clearly. He supports one type of government spending and not another. What’s not to understand?
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37996 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Space Force



What do you think the missing $20T+ went to already???
Apparently it is getting more and more difficult for the establishment to get away with stealing the money, so now they're creating a separate entity to steal it "legally" from us.

Trump is just so anti-establishment, isn't he?
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
20333 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Do you really need to be spending money on another branch of the military?


IB, you can never have too many guns or too much ammunition. Oh wait, different argument. Sorry.
Posted by burdhead
WOMP WOMP!!
Member since Apr 2017
6008 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

find some unobtainium too.
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
13103 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:01 pm to
Hey Freeman wake up we have aliens visiting us and have to defend the Earth........

Need to watch yo' some Starwars bro'.......


Trump is getting Russia, NK and Iran to conspire against the Greys next year......


Trump is going to save Earth with his light saber.....

Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:53 pm to
That showed as a reply to me. Sorry about that.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:57 pm to
Trump may just be trying to get McCain to say something nice about him before he passes. One would think that pawn of the MIC would be ecstatic about an entire new branch of the military his contributors can feed off of.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:00 pm to
A branch of the military focused on space is not a bad idea and is long overdue. If you really care about decreasing defense spending you should be lobbying for massive reductions or even disbandment of the the active duty Army.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:04 pm to
quote:


A branch of the military focused on space is not a bad idea and is long overdue. If you really care about decreasing defense spending you should be lobbying for massive reductions or even disbandment of the the active duty Army.


I would support cuts across the board but let me assure you a new branch of the military will not be born of the current budget. They would add "hugely" to the budget to establish the new branch. The heads of all the branches are among other things taxpayer funded lobbyist for money for their branch. They often take positions with military vendors after retirement.
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 6:12 pm
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:06 pm to
I’m
More than we’ll aware of the issues with military spending. In fact, I’m the most outspoken poster on this board regarding cutting military spending. However, if having a military to defend our nation is a requirement, which as it happens it is, then a dedicated Space organization should be part of it.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74390 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:07 pm to
Well said.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:13 pm to
Cut it all 20% and then make your space force out of some of the money remaining and I will be ok---as if anyone cares!
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:16 pm to
Well across the board cuts are generally stupid and really don’t do anything but sound good in talking points.

The answer is to abolish the active duty Army and most of the Air Force and fold them into a national guard type function. Funding for the Navy should be significantly increased and a new branch that controls Space, Cyber and our Nuclear Forces should be well funded also. Or just give all the nukes to the Navy. The whole nuclear triad thing is retarded and outdated anyway.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

How did you come to any of those conclusions?


Mainly this...

quote:

What do you people that love more military spending, love tariffs, love farm welfare and hate all immigration call your political philosophy? you certainly are not conservative or liberal or freedom loving libertarian. You are not free traders or small government advocates.


You are asking. I’m telling you becaus the federal governement should be in charge of the military, tariffs, and immigration. IT IS LITERALLY WRITTEN CLEARLY IN THE CONSTITUTION.

So yes, you can still be pro-small government and endorse the issues you listed.

How is that hard to understand?
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 7:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram