- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
More from Flock
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:26 pm
9
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:30 pm to Night Vision
Normally one would have to get a warrant to track someone. Not anymore.
NB4 I have nothing to hide
NB4 I have nothing to hide
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:32 pm to wheelr
How long do you have to register a used car after you buy one?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:33 pm to Night Vision
I bet it was that sexy arse crazy wife of the guy that lost his arm.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:35 pm to Night Vision
I saw something that indicated that you can take these Fl@ck cameras out with a green laser pointer.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:35 pm to Night Vision
I hope every flick camera is vandalized and destroyed. Should be totally outlawed. If we let this shite become normal we are no better than the UK in terms of letting the state control us.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:38 pm to Night Vision
Lucky girl, she’s going to be so fricking rich after she sues the shite out of them
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:40 pm to LongHornHandy
quote:
Lucky girl, she’s going to be so fricking rich after she sues the shite out of them
Wonder what this could be worth. 250K? Doubt you’re getting millions.
Muh privacy
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:41 pm to Godzilla jr
quote:
I hope every flick camera is vandalized and destroyed
We have dipshits in our HOA advocating for installing these.
I don’t understand the believed sense of security these are supposed to provide.
frick we had cops tail a stolen vehicle into the neighborhood the other day and still lost the assholes in a foot chase. Tf is some camera footage that would be provided anyways by the numerous smart devices all our homes were equipped with at build going to do?
shite is pointless and provides no benefit
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:42 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Wonder what this could be worth. 250K? Doubt you’re getting millions. Muh privacy
I would have assumed it would be more than that, guess we get to wait and see though
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:42 pm to LongHornHandy
quote:
We have dipshits in our HOA advocating for installing these.
Because HOA’s are all about control.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 3:51 pm to LongHornHandy
quote:
shite is pointless and provides no benefit
This is just a stupid thing to say. I'm sure it could/would/does provide benefits. A plate number, clothing description, time and location of offense, any number of things useful to LE.
The question is...Do the benefits outweigh the liabilities, misuse and abuse in this example.
BTW, I'm no lawyer or expert, but I think USSC ruled OK for observation in public as there is limited expectation of privacy once out in the streets. Others can and probably will weigh in on that.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:19 pm to Night Vision
Persistent surveillance by a 3rd party is not an observation, and should not be protected by the 4th.
frick Flock.
(not an attorney)
frick Flock.
(not an attorney)
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:48 pm to Godzilla jr
quote:
I hope every flick camera is vandalized and destroyed. Should be totally outlawed. If we let this shite become normal we are no better than the UK in terms of letting the state control us.
Please explain to the class how capturing your plate on a public roadway is the same as the insanity in the UK.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:49 pm to Night Vision
These Flocks are a major problem.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:52 pm to Victor R Franko
If it was the city/county operating these things then maybe it would have a bit more merit to the good but this is a private company doing it and they didn’t seem to like being filmed at their office by a random citizen.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 4:55 pm to Herschal
quote:
Persistent surveillance by a 3rd party is not an observation, and should not be protected by the 4th.
If that was protected by the 4th that guy wouldn't be put in the backk of police vehicle and going to jail, would he?
Posted on 7/6/26 at 5:13 pm to Victor R Franko
quote:
If that was protected by the 4th that guy wouldn't be put in the backk of police vehicle and going to jail, would he?
I am not sure as I am not an attorney. Not sure if you saw that part of my post.
Since you do practice law, can you point me to any court cases that affirm your position? Just trying to learn more about it.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 5:18 pm to Night Vision
quote:wow
He THEN added her vehicle to a "hot list" in the database that would alert him every time her car passed a privately owned surveillance camera in his county.
Posted on 7/6/26 at 5:20 pm to Herschal
I'm not an attorney either as I stated in my first post. I'm a loud mouth with an opion, and quite the expert at that. Smart guy.
This post was edited on 7/6/26 at 5:22 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News