- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More audio between Crowder and Boreing has been leaked...
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:10 am to Lou Pai
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:10 am to Lou Pai
quote:
admit it, this is the first time you've heard of a term sheet. It's okay.
No actually. I've done contract work before. Again, I believe lawyers who have worked with content creators specifically on contracts over Lou Pai from tigerdroppings.com.
0
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:56 am to Azkiger
Well said.
I like Crowder but he's way out of line here.
I like Crowder but he's way out of line here.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:59 am to JasonMason
quote:
hat wasn't the only potential fee reduction in the term sheet. Let's go with that though. So he's now at 37.5 million over 4 based on your numbers. So that's less than 9.5 million a year. 25-30 employees + production costs. What's left?
Then add on top of that DW is getting those Crowder subs whether he's monetized on YouTube or not. Conservatively say he brings in 200k which seems very low. That's between 18-25 million annually.
Crowder also has a significant following on rumble where he'd still be able to earn as revenue in your scenario. Poor DW would still be making money hand over fist on this deal.
Daily Wire wouldn't be losing money on the deal. Crowder would.
These are a lot of words just to say "Yes, it is actually just about the money."
Posted on 1/25/23 at 10:59 am to theunknownknight
quote:
You missed my obvious point. I am barely following, yet Crowder was clear enough in his point for me to understand.
So basically, you haven't really looked into it but you're taking Crowder's words at face value.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 11:01 am to JasonMason
quote:
If you actually believe for one second DW did not know his monetization status on YouTube, you're a fool.
I literally said it doesnt matter if you do or not, and this is what you come back with.
quote:
Again, why put it in there if you are just going to take it out?
Because thats how negotiations work?
quote:
You're only looking at this from the side of the DW and what Ben has told you clearly
No, im looking at this as someone who sees Crowder being disingenuous. Faux outrage over a solicited offer trying to detail a business model that he has worked under his entire career.
If you want to change the business model, then go do it on your own and show them. That i could support.
Turning others in the space into your boogeyman is just bush league.
If the napkin math you keep using is so simple, then Crowder should be happy to be out on his own for the first time in his career. Go make all the money.
Instead we’re 2 weeks into his PR blitz of turning other conservatives into the bad guys. Because of a disagreement over business models. And oh by the way, dont forget to signup!
And since you keep deflecting with DW over and over, let me make it clear for you. Jordan Peterson is the only one at DW I like and its from long before he went over there.
This post was edited on 1/25/23 at 11:10 am
Posted on 1/25/23 at 11:03 am to JasonMason
quote:
Multiple lawyers disagree with you, and I take their opinion over Lou Pai from tigerddroppings.com.
Which lawyers read this:
...and conclude it's binding?
Posted on 1/25/23 at 11:09 am to Texas Weazel
quote:
He's mad that DW wouldn't pay him if he was demonetized. He wants to get paid, even if his actions would have costed the company revenue.
Crowder is just making a silly argument. He wants to claim DW is all about money, yet he is crying about money himself. This is all just stupid.
The whole thing gets more and more ridiculous the more you hear about it. At the end of the day, the stupid thing was DW and DC even considering joining forces. Both conservative pundits with huge/very overlapping audiences, but with approaches so different it was never going to work. Short term or long term.
They'd have been better off just sticking to guest appearances and sniping/quipping at each other occasionally. This brouhaha turns people off to both of them.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 11:48 am to efrad
quote:
So basically, you haven't really looked into it but you're taking Crowder's words at face value.
This isn’t rocket science
Crowder SAID why he did what he did
I followed that much. He was clear in what he said and his reasoning. The poster I was responding to attributed reasoning to Crowder that mischaracterized what I know he said.
The rest I don’t care about or have followed.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:43 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Crowder is calling them hypocritical for writing clauses into their contracts that make those who work for the DW beholden to big tech’s fascist policies, the very policies DW makes bank railing against.
This is a good example of why “hypocrisy” is sometimes morally justified.
People are regarded about hypocrisy.
Oh a preacher had an affair!!! See, Christianity is just a bunch of bull!!
Derp
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:50 pm to JasonMason
quote:
IF Crowder brings half of the 400k he claimed to have
He claimed to have 400k subs?
His counter offer was 30 mil a year. 400k subs equals 40 mil a year.
Crowder doesn't know how many subs he has.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News