- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:14 am to PsychTiger
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:14 am to PsychTiger
My Senators are golden. Cotton and the Eye doc. I believe the eye doc played football for the Pigs even.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 11:15 am
1
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:14 am to Stonehog
You are too stupid to understand what gutting executive privilege would do to the executive branch going forward.
I suspect you only want it for democrats
I suspect you only want it for democrats
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:16 am to gthog61
quote:
You are too stupid
Stonehog is constantly on the wrong side of things.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:16 am to sms151t
Yeah but it is still good to call so they can share the overwhelming support to the cucks
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:17 am to BoarEd
Truth
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:17 am to gthog61
quote:Prune-back the Imperial Presidency and return it to something closer to parity with the other two branches?
You are too stupid to understand what gutting executive privilege would do to the executive branch going forward.
Something like what the Founders intended?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:18 am to PsychTiger
good for you. we all need to make our voices known and not presume they know we are sick of the shams.
call (202) 224-3121 and say no to sham witnesses and stall tactics; get on with America's business.
call (202) 224-3121 and say no to sham witnesses and stall tactics; get on with America's business.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:18 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
They will say all of that anyway NO MATTER WHAT THE GOP DOES.
But the Republicans can actually refute it if they allow witnesses. You're giving the media and Democrats more, and better, ammo by blocking witnesses and voting to acquit immediately. Have the appearance of a fair trial, and that allows the vulnerable Republicans to cast their vote for acquittal while telling their constituents they fought for a fair trial. It would likely even get a few Democrats to vote for acquittal too. That's a much better look for Trump.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:19 am to PsychTiger
I contacted Cassidy's office and told him he will not get my vote if he joins Mittens and calls for witnesses. I voted for him in each of his candidacies, too.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:19 am to BoarEd
quote:
Stonehog is constantly on the wrong side of things.
I voted for Trump.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:20 am to Stonehog
I give up. Carry on son.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:21 am to accusatory_giblet
quote:
Thus, it's a question ny question scenario.
No, it's a topic situation. To the best of my recollection it's never been a question-by-question scenario. Even if I am wrong on that I will bet that Presidents claiming EP make that claim FAR more often than not before the exact questions are known, thus they are claiming EP on the topic itself.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:21 am to Stonehog
quote:
I voted for Trump.
See, this is all your fault.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:21 am to Stonehog
quote:
Have the appearance of a fair trial,
No. 17-0.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:21 am to gthog61
quote:
You are too stupid to understand what gutting executive privilege would do to the executive branch going forward.
JFC. I said he could exercise executive privilege if he wants. Choosing not to exercise it has no effect on the future of executive privilege, and sets no precedent.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:22 am to Stonehog
How do you get around the fact that the house dems did a rush job and not complete their work? They could have remedied this through the courts. They shouldn’t be allowed to do this. It’s bad precedent going forward.
Impeachment can then be changed to a show in the house knowing the senate can be forced to do the house's job. Executive privilege should be protected as well.
Impeachment can then be changed to a show in the house knowing the senate can be forced to do the house's job. Executive privilege should be protected as well.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:23 am to Stonehog
quote:
and sets no precedent.
Nonsense. We have all listened to these people throughout this process. At every step they look to impeachment proceedings in the past as a guideline moving forward.
If these witnesses they want to take the stand are allowed, in the future they will look back to this point and see that the executive caved to the illegitimate requests of the Congress.
They are making a grave mistake here.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:26 am to BoarEd
quote:
If these witnesses they want to take the stand are allowed, in the future they will look back to this point and see that the executive caved to the illegitimate requests of the Congress.
And the next president to be impeached can simply exercise his executive privilege. Your hypothetical doesn't make any sense.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:28 am to Rebel
quote:
I don’t think he wants any part of Hunter testifying or anyone looking more closely at Ukraine corruption.
This. Their corruption won’t be exposed any more than it already has. Which is the worst part.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:29 am to Stonehog
quote:Watch that reasoned political analysis. Join the pep rally, or be labeled a “progstain.”
having the (Kav) investigation turned out to be the right move in the end. The FBI investigated, he was clean, and he got the votes because of it.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News