- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Minnesota Bill Against Genital Mutilation Faces Opposition
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:08 am to KCT
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:08 am to KCT
I haven't read the bill or the entire article, but this isolated commented seems pretty reasonable to me...
quote:
argue that the legislation carries overly harsh punishment and unintended consequences, including the possibility that newcomers from countries where genital cutting is widespread would not seek medical care and other services for their children. They call for a less punitive approach focused on educating parents.
1
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:14 am to Trauma14
Would the law apply to people that come here AFTER they have already mutilated their children?
Why are we importing child mutilators any way.
Liberals are fricking insane.
Why are we importing child mutilators any way.
Liberals are fricking insane.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:16 am to KCT
This kind of shite is exactly why I don't fricking want them
here.
Every time I've said that they will change our country dem-progs are like "nuh un,we have laws".
here.
Every time I've said that they will change our country dem-progs are like "nuh un,we have laws".
Posted on 5/25/17 at 8:17 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Same state that tried to ban spanking
Why does Minnesota hate kinky sex?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:32 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Funny, Big Brother doesn't seem to have a problem telling anyone else 'This is wrong'. What's so special about these people?
Because if we stop offending the muslims, they will stop committing terrorist acts all over the world.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 9:35 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Agreed. In the U.S., we should not be examining laws and customs from other countries to determine what the people of our country want to allow or disallow.
This might be the most ignorant thing I've read this year. Who the frick cares what is "deeply rooted" where they come from.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 10:00 am to KCT
We need to end all genital mutilation. Especially fgm but including circumcision. Especially the creepy baby penis sucking kind.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 10:06 am to oklahogjr
quote:Not all genital mutilation is equal. It's fine if you don't think male circumcision is good or necessary but it provides not detrimental effects of the recipient, therefore it should be allowed based on the preference of the parents.
We need to end all genital mutilation. Especially fgm but including circumcision. Especially the creepy baby penis sucking kind.
FGM, on the other hand, creates pain and discomfort for the girl her entire life.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:34 am to KCT
So if coming from a place where beating my kids is ok and then I beat my kid so bad that he might die ... it's ok if I don't take him the hospital because I don't want to go to jail?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:37 am to KCT
" cases of female genital mutilation."
Why just females? This seems to be the rare case of a law that is sexist against males. Shouldn't boys have their genitals protected from mutilation as well?
Why just females? This seems to be the rare case of a law that is sexist against males. Shouldn't boys have their genitals protected from mutilation as well?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 11:39 am to FooManChoo
quote:
Not all genital mutilation is equal. It's fine if you don't think male circumcision is good or necessary but it provides not detrimental effects of the recipient, therefore it should be allowed based on the preference of the parents.
FGM, on the other hand, creates pain and discomfort for the girl her entire life.
You are correct that female genital mutilation has more severe consequences, but that fact alone does not mean male genital mutilation should be legal.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 12:07 pm to AllKnowingTrashHeap
quote:
You are correct that female genital mutilation has more severe consequences, but that fact alone does not mean male genital mutilation should be legal.
Intent is important here. The intent of FGM is purely to remove the ability to derive pleasure from sex. The intent of circumcision is sanitary (whether you agree or not) and not to remove sexual pleasure from men.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News