- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Media panics that two lawyers on Trump jury will vote to acquit.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 6:27 pm to shrevetigertom
Posted on 4/18/24 at 6:27 pm to shrevetigertom
Have you seen the pack of clown lawyers we have here? Those clowns would vote guilty after opening arguments.
0
Posted on 4/18/24 at 6:56 pm to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
Do you believe in God?
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:00 pm to VOR
quote:
There are plenty of Republican lawyers.
but not in Manhattan
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:04 pm to loogaroo
He must. He worships the Devil.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:15 pm to loogaroo
quote:
2 of Trump’s jurors are lawyers. Would they acquit on a technicality? The “totally uncommon” prospect of two lawyers serving on the same jury could benefit the former president, some jury experts say.
Wait is the media admitting that the outcome of the trial was supposed to be predetermined?
Posted on 4/21/24 at 2:37 pm to loogaroo
quote:Progressive media is panicking mostly about Juror #2, who per the NYT gets news only from Truth Social:
Media panics
Posted on 4/21/24 at 2:42 pm to loogaroo
Every juror regardless of profession will vote based on their bias in this one. There really isn't anything to consider otherwise.
It is pretty funny to see them openly concerned that there are people on the jury who might actually know the law though.
It is pretty funny to see them openly concerned that there are people on the jury who might actually know the law though.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 2:58 pm to loogaroo
Given the media's history of false fears and collaboration with the IC, it is far more likely that these two are compensated actors that will attempt to ensure the jury unanimously convicts.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 3:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Attorneys could be just as biased as the judge and prosecutor. They will know without a doubt that he should be acquitted, however. Just a matter of how much they care. The leftists on this board don’t leave me much hope of them being honest if they are lefties.
Very well said, spot on.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 4:59 pm to loogaroo
Another set up... they can now sa,.when they issue a conviction, the not 1 but 2 lawyers were on the Jury and this must be a just verdict.
Watch and See, they'll build this up as some benefit for Trump and then later use it to say he got a fairly trial but was obviously guilty due to the 2 lawyers on Jury.
Watch and See, they'll build this up as some benefit for Trump and then later use it to say he got a fairly trial but was obviously guilty due to the 2 lawyers on Jury.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 5:13 pm to TBoy
quote:
have never heard of two lawyers on a single jury. Wild.
Generally neither side wants a lawyer on the jury because they are worried he or she will have undue influence on other jurors, in essence become a one person jury
Posted on 4/21/24 at 5:15 pm to loogaroo
Isn’t Dan Goldman a Manhattan attorney?
Posted on 4/21/24 at 5:51 pm to loogaroo
Would be hilarious if the prog push against non-unanimous verdicts in criminal trials bites them in the arse.
This post was edited on 4/21/24 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 4/21/24 at 6:08 pm to WB Davis
Juror number 4 must have been looking for the Tigerrant on that list.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:09 pm to loogaroo
Lawyer- a person skilled in circumventing the law
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:12 pm to loogaroo
Wait, someone who knows the law might... follow the law??
Noooooooo!!!
Noooooooo!!!
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:24 pm to loogaroo
The only lawyers I know who have ever been on juries have been on criminal juries. The conventional wisdom is that they would fairly apply law to facts.
My gut reaction therefore, was initially, this is a good thing for Trump bc a lawyer would want to see actual evidence of an actual crime, and this case from what I can tell has neither.
But considering that Jack Smith, Fani Willis and that Dumbass Letitia woman went to lawschool, and law schools themselves have become daycare facilities for woke people in their late 20s who want to settle social scores, I’m really not sure what to think.
My gut reaction therefore, was initially, this is a good thing for Trump bc a lawyer would want to see actual evidence of an actual crime, and this case from what I can tell has neither.
But considering that Jack Smith, Fani Willis and that Dumbass Letitia woman went to lawschool, and law schools themselves have become daycare facilities for woke people in their late 20s who want to settle social scores, I’m really not sure what to think.
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:31 pm to Wednesday
Hung Jury on at least 30/34 counts
probability 83% +\~2%
of the posters already convinced of conviction:
87% thought same of Kyle Rittenhouse
probability 96% +\~1%
probability 83% +\~2%
of the posters already convinced of conviction:
87% thought same of Kyle Rittenhouse
probability 96% +\~1%
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:36 pm to loogaroo
SFP and Boosie. You comfortable with that?
Posted on 4/21/24 at 7:59 pm to Rebel
quote:
You think SFP, Uncle Boosie, or Pedo Hank would vote to acquit?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News