- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
War Eagle 777
| Favorite team: | Auburn |
| Location: | Georgia |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 513 |
| Registered on: | 11/29/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Will the Alabama-Georgia Game Get Moved
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 10/7/26 at 11:59 am to tween the hedges
Latest advisory is that all Georgia fans should stay home in case the hotel rooms are needed for evacuees
re: Brown is no Cam
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 10/4/26 at 10:31 pm to threedog79
This weekend Holden Grenier looked good for Pitt, Hank Brown looked pretty good for Iowa. Ashton Daniels had a great game for FSU. All former AU quarterbacks, all no longer behind the OL of AU. See a pattern here?
re: CFB is almost unwatchable
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/25/26 at 10:30 pm to AwgustaDawg
One thing I like about NFL games is that a 1:00 game means a 1:05 kickoff. In college. they might kick off by 1:45
re: WSJ: Banning Diesel Exports a bad idea
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/23/26 at 10:52 am to CitizenK
quote:
Transportation is cheaper in foreign flag ships than truck or rail by a lot. Hawaii gets crude oil from the Middle East, not Alaska partly for this reason
Not to mention it is very difficult to drive a truck or train from Alaska to Hawaii
re: WSJ: Banning Diesel Exports a bad idea
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/23/26 at 10:49 am to prplhze2000
quote:
But there’s not enough pipeline capacity to move the diesel in the Gulf Coast that is normally exported to the Northeast and California, or for that matter to significantly boost flows to the Midwest.
So how does the diesel get to the Northeast and California now?
Something can be carried by ship from one US port to another and that is not an "export"
re: Arch admitted to the press that this is his favorite video of the Sark/Rowe moment
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/14/26 at 8:56 pm to TigerMonkey7
quote:
When in actuality she knows more ball than pretty much every other sideline reporter
That is a pretty low standard
re: The one juror in the Clancy case
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/4/26 at 7:17 pm to evil cockroach
quote:
If it was 11-1, the state won’t retry
State has already announced they will retry. If they drop charges she walks. Can not imagine a prosecutor will do that with 3 dead kids
re: The one juror in the Clancy case
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/4/26 at 7:09 pm to sgallo3
quote:
How did people verify this? Seems like one of those internet rumors that just picked up steam and everyone ran with because they want it to be true.
The fact that the Jury Foreperson only wanted one juror booted because he would not agree with her pretty much says it was 11-1
re: Clancy Trial declared a Mistrial
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 9/4/26 at 6:34 pm to JimEverett
quote:
She is in a state psych facility. she will remain there until the State decides to 1. try her again, or 2. accepts a plea agreement, or 3. drops the charges.
How the hell do you drop charges and let the killer of 3 kids walk among us?
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 9:56 pm to Boom33
quote:
These are voluntary and you choose to share that data.
That was the argument the government made and was rejected by SCOTUS. They focused on how tracking a cell phone can be tracked even on private property and how no one seems to be able to not have one attached. They also mentioned that very few people know their phones do this and even fewer no that their carrier keeps it.
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 9:48 pm to Boom33
quote:
And as you mentioned - NEED A WARRANT to get the information. It's not even close to being the same thing.
So are you fine with Flock if a search warrant was required?
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 8:24 pm to Red Eagle
BTW your cell phone sends a signal to a cell site every 2 minutes. It does so whether your phone is in a public area or in a private residence. The location of every tower you ping is recorded by your carrier. It is called CSLI and can be obtained with a search warrant.
Also for you folks who use Google Location History, that gives your precise location (not just tower) and is also kept by Google. It can be obtained with a search warrant.
Also for you folks who use Google Location History, that gives your precise location (not just tower) and is also kept by Google. It can be obtained with a search warrant.
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 7:54 pm to RunningJacket
Or drones with cameras right above their heads
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 7:51 pm to Red Eagle
quote:
It was me presenting what a quick internet search provided and you trying your hardest to justify government surveillance using 3rd parties.
Never rely on the internet when arguing legal points.
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 7:48 pm to Red Eagle
quote:
It was me presenting what a quick internet search provided and you trying your hardest to justify government surveillance using 3rd parties.
Never trust the internet on legal matters, you end up looking bad every time
re: ICE intervenes in a Houston-Venezuelan love story
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 6:37 pm to idlewatcher
My bet is that his kids tipped ICE off to save the inheritance. You know how those young ones feel about Boomers keeping the fruits of their labor
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 6:33 pm to Red Eagle
Red Eagle. FYI, Chatrie v. United States, 146 S.Ct 2878 decided 6/29/26 is a much better case for your argument (you are welcome). BTW both Carpenter and Chatrie involved private data bases (Google CSLI and HL).
I suspect when a case makes it to SCOTUS they will rule that Law Enforcement will need a search warrant to obtain the Flock info in the absence of exigent circumstances.
. Don't get mad because I fact checked your your pseudo legal argument and found it wanting
I suspect when a case makes it to SCOTUS they will rule that Law Enforcement will need a search warrant to obtain the Flock info in the absence of exigent circumstances.
. Don't get mad because I fact checked your your pseudo legal argument and found it wanting
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 4:11 pm to Red Eagle
Red Eagle - the Short version of that is "SCOTUS has not ruled that viewing a vehicle passing by on a public road is a search. Further SCOTUS has treated automobiles very differently. A warrant less search of a vehicle can be conducted when a search warrant is required to search a house.
In Carpenter v U.S. SCOTUS held that tracking a phone for 127 days required Police to obtain a search warrant (very much like the requirement to get a court order to install a GPS tracker). It did not hold that a data base containing that info can not be created.
However my point stands. All the other data bases I cited can be used to create a similar profile of someone's movements and actions. Requiring a warrant is far different than demanding the technology be banned. So what are people demanding Flock tech be banned but not the other?
In Carpenter v U.S. SCOTUS held that tracking a phone for 127 days required Police to obtain a search warrant (very much like the requirement to get a court order to install a GPS tracker). It did not hold that a data base containing that info can not be created.
However my point stands. All the other data bases I cited can be used to create a similar profile of someone's movements and actions. Requiring a warrant is far different than demanding the technology be banned. So what are people demanding Flock tech be banned but not the other?
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 1:56 pm to Sweep Da Leg
I hear the concern but do not understand the selective outrage. Of all the data bases that have been collected and are still being collected, Flock has more safeguards than most. The local government that leases the cameras (and determines where they are placed) also control what other agencies the info is shared with, how long the date is retained and who and under what circumstances the data can be viewed.
So if you want the Flock cameras removed, what about all those other data bases?
So if you want the Flock cameras removed, what about all those other data bases?
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 1:43 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
Watch it bub. If you wanna start the ad hominen bullshite, I'm not a fun person to get into a fight with. I'll let my posting history speak for me, because this ain't worth my time unless you wanna fight.
Your answer is unworthy of further response so do not worry. Good day you keyboard bad arse!
re: What is your take on the use of Flock Cameras?
Posted by War Eagle 777 on 8/6/26 at 1:21 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
dude.
Dude: I have not heard that phrase in a while. How old are you? Actually a camera observing a public road is not any more unconstitutional than someone standing on the sidewalk watching traffic on that same road.
I agree your argument is pitiful but it is the exact same rationale the gun control people use
Popular
0












