War Eagle 777

quote:

---

These are voluntary and you choose to share that data.

---

That was the argument the government made and was rejected by SCOTUS. They focused on how tracking a cell phone can be tracked even on private property and how no one seems to be able to not have one attached. They also mentioned that very few people know their phones do this and even fewer no that their carrier keeps it.

BTW your cell phone sends a signal to a cell site every 2 minutes. It does so whether your phone is in a public area or in a private residence. The location of every tower you ping is recorded by your carrier. It is called CSLI and can be obtained with a search warrant.

Also for you folks who use Google Location History, that gives your precise location (not just tower) and is also kept by Google. It can be obtained with a search warrant.

quote:

---

It was me presenting what a quick internet search provided and you trying your hardest to justify government surveillance using 3rd parties.

---

Never rely on the internet when arguing legal points.

My bet is that his kids tipped ICE off to save the inheritance. You know how those young ones feel about Boomers keeping the fruits of their labor

Red Eagle - the Short version of that is "SCOTUS has not ruled that viewing a vehicle passing by on a public road is a search. Further SCOTUS has treated automobiles very differently. A warrant less search of a vehicle can be conducted when a search warrant is required to search a house.

In Carpenter v U.S. SCOTUS held that tracking a phone for 127 days required Police to obtain a search warrant (very much like the requirement to get a court order to install a GPS tracker). It did not hold that a data base containing that info can not be created.

However my point stands. All the other data bases I cited can be used to create a similar profile of someone's movements and actions. Requiring a warrant is far different than demanding the technology be banned. So what are people demanding Flock tech be banned but not the other?

quote:

---

Watch it bub. If you wanna start the ad hominen bullshite, I'm not a fun person to get into a fight with. I'll let my posting history speak for me, because this ain't worth my time unless you wanna fight.

---

Your answer is unworthy of further response so do not worry. Good day you keyboard bad arse!

quote:

---

There's already cops being caught misusing them.

---

Some People have misused guns, so I assume you are in favor of banning all guns?

Some people have misused cameras in phones. Do we ban all cell phones or just ban having cameras in them?

How about cars, they can be misused - ban them as well/

Any and all technology can be misused just as any and all laws can be broken. You punish the wrongdoers, not ban the technology.

quote:

---

Why dont you agree to turn over all your gun's serial numbers, makes and models. to a private company so they can place them in a database. That should help deter criminals right? Sheesh.

---

So you want to ban flock cameras because someone misused them. Isn't that the exact argument the gun control people make? Because a few abuse guns, they should be banned for all?

quote:

---

o not be massed surveilled by the government and have all of that information uploaded to a data base somewhere. Not saying it does not happen via other methods like cell phones but I don't support that either. we are all fricked.

---

Your complaint then is not that you have a right to privacy, but how the data is stored and accessed. You are being surveilled whether you like it or not. The best you can do is to put in place safeguards to try to prevent it being misused and prosecute the hell out of anyone who violates it.

Just think what the data base for your credit cards show. What you buy and where, what type of gas and where you buy it - what you eat and where and much more. They no only don't safeguard that data, they sell it to others

quote:

---

invasion of privacy by government. No other way to view it.

---

You voluntarily go out in public (on a public road). What is your expectation of privacy?

quote:

---

f the contract was valid I don't blame Ole Miss for trying to enforce it. This NIL/transfer at will mess needs to be brought under control.

---

This needs to be done on players and also on coaches who breach a contract to go somewhere else. Buyouts should go both ways