- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:29 pm to Janky
Calling witnesses only hurts the Dems, it’s a no win for them. McConnell is probably saying this to get the Dems to vote against witnesses
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:30 pm to rbWarEagle
Knowing the GOP, they'll vote for witnesses yet won't call Hunter, Joe, Schiff, or the whistleblower.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:30 pm to CDawson
quote:
And the spineless GOP never changes
Hard to change when your on the same team.
Romney is milking this thing dry and Graham could give a shite either way.
Turtle might care, but he will probably keep majority.
They can hide behind just enough GOP enthusiasm to keep solid seats and enough doubt to leverage others.
Fvck that place and those people!
They use the American people.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:31 pm to Hurricane Mike
quote:
If I'm Mitch, there's not a vote on witnesses until that testimony is released
Absolutely, 100%. What is Shiftys reason for NOT regarding, to this point? (Atkinson's testimony)
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:32 pm to Sentrius
quote:
There's no universe where republican senators can vote to give dems their witnesses, Trump gets none and not expect to suffer any political consequences for it.
Never underestimate the ability of the GOP to appease Democrats.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:32 pm to rbWarEagle
I wish trump would break off and start his own party. I hate these republican cuck swamp monsters.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:33 pm to The Pirate King
He basically has already. You’re part of it. 
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:34 pm to rbWarEagle
This is why we need to disengage from this for a moment and get Bernie nominated. If the Rinocrat corporatists remove Trump from office we need a spare club to beat them with.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:35 pm to MrLSU
quote:
So there will be litigation now over Executive Privilege which means that Trump will still be under impeachment in November.
Yes, and this is exactly what the Dems need -- Trump under Impeachment proceedings on Election Day 2020.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:36 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
Rick Scott just told FOX there won't be witnesses.
I saw that too. I hope he's right.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:38 pm to Cs
quote:
Knowing the GOP, they'll vote for witnesses yet won't call Hunter, Joe, Schiff, or the whistleblower.
I keep seeing this about Schiff and the whistleblower. What possible relevance do they have as witnesses? They have no knowledge on what Trump did vis a vis Ukraine.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:40 pm to rbWarEagle
Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
**OR**
No Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
Same result either way, but which are you for??
**OR**
No Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
Same result either way, but which are you for??
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:42 pm to Sentrius
quote:
There's no universe where republican senators can vote to give dems their witnesses, Trump gets none and not expect to suffer any political consequences for it.
The vulnerable seats are vulnerable regardless and Mitt has 5 more years and could retire at his age.
I wouldn't put it past them to be cucks
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:44 pm to Champagne
quote:
Yes, and this is exactly what the Dems need -- Trump under Impeachment proceedings on Election Day 2020.
Best way to defeat impeachment is to reelect, lol
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:44 pm to Hurricane Mike
Who knows, retirement might be much more unpleasant in such a scenario.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:46 pm to LCA131
quote:
Absolutely, 100%. What is Shiftys reason for NOT regarding, to this point? (Atkinson's testimony)
It would destroy his impeachment inquiry work. It would show the collusion with the WB, leaking of classified phone conversation details, and put a black mark on the reputation of those involved in the impeachment inquiry. It would probably not look good to show obvious bias and gross errors/mischaracterizations akin to the FBI-mueller scandal.
Schiff has lied continuously about having evidence of Russian collusion, OMB, type things. I suspect this is no different.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:50 pm to Mulat
Witnesses will drag this farce out, which unfortunately has already been legitimized.
Witnesses will also bury the dems. Doesn't matter who is called. This won't go well for them.
Witnesses will also bury the dems. Doesn't matter who is called. This won't go well for them.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:50 pm to Champagne
That’s why the senate needs to dismiss without hearing from witnesses now.
Let the dems know the senate would happily put on a witness trial if the house actually had any real evidence that support actual impeachable offenses. But until then they will not be used to help cheat in the 2020 election.
Let the dems know the senate would happily put on a witness trial if the house actually had any real evidence that support actual impeachable offenses. But until then they will not be used to help cheat in the 2020 election.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 5:51 pm to rbWarEagle
WSJ is correct. Chad confirmed Turtle does not have the votes.
For those of you fools that have hard on's for witnesses thinking it will be fair and will exonerate Trump and call out the bad guys...
For those of you fools that have hard on's for witnesses thinking it will be fair and will exonerate Trump and call out the bad guys...
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News