- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
accusatory_giblet
| Favorite team: | LA-Monroe  |
| Location: | Dixieana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 13 |
| Registered on: | 1/19/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/29/20 at 11:37 am to Bard
Regardless, Trump is correct to invoke EP no matter how short or long that process may take to unravel. But I sorta get the feeling given the current climate that it would be a tad adversarial in every way possible. I.e. take a nice chunk of time.
1
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/29/20 at 11:14 am to Bard
quote:
No he doesn't. He can still claim EP, that would go to the courts and quickly to SCOTUS.
EP is not a blanket deal that simply covers a whole person. Some questions wouldn't be covered by EP, some would. Thus, it's a question ny question scenario. So how long do you think THAT process takes to play out??
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/29/20 at 10:58 am to Stonehog
quote:
We know Bolton's testimony isn't actually going to sway Republicans in favor of removal, so why block it?
I refer back to my previous post about setting dangerous precedence. Just to take it a tad further to assist, what this would amount to is then the possibility of every single President from here on out being impeached PLUS the impeaching party citing this President's setting precedence that let's hear from the entire administration without worrying with executive privilege. "Heck, Trump allowed it, why don't you allow it??" Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat.
re: Miss Lindsey about to hold impromptu presser
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/29/20 at 10:49 am to Stonehog
quote:
It's the right move. People were already saying Trump wouldn't be acquitted in the eyes of many if Republicans didn't bend a little on witnesses. Have a couple witnesses, take the vote, acquit Trump and move on.
You clearly don't quite understand some of the more important aspects at play here. In order "have a couple of witnesses" just like that, Trump would have to waive executive privilege. And you don't simply willy nilly do that. If you don't understand why, then that's on you and you will just have to do your own research on it.
re: John Brennan Calls For Cancellation Of The State Of The Union
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 7:35 pm to LuckyTiger
I'm calling for the cancellation of Brennan.
re: Why don’t y’all want witnesses
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 5:54 pm to DavidTheGnome
Because you touch yourself at night. And little kids as well, from what I read on another board. Whoopsie!! Best come up with some witnesses to disprove that!!
re: McConnell says GOP doesn’t have votes to block witnesses
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 5:44 pm to Hurricane Mike
Who knows, retirement might be much more unpleasant in such a scenario.
re: McConnell says GOP doesn’t have votes to block witnesses
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 5:40 pm to rbWarEagle
Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
**OR**
No Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
Same result either way, but which are you for??
**OR**
No Witnesses -- Trump didn't do anything impeachable -- stays in office, no removal
Same result either way, but which are you for??
re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 1:51 pm to texashorn
quote:
I’ve said I think Trump is guilty of quid pro quo
:lol:
Just of "quid pro quo"? Nothing beyond that?? Lol not even the Democrats asserted just quid pro quo to be an impeachable offense, so congrats on the hot take.
re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 1:37 pm to 225bred
OP, if you haven't picked up on it by now given the daily explanations, kindly log off and don't come back until you get your head straight.
For everyone else, these trolls and mental midgets will do this if you attempt to answer this same question every single day:
They act as is they no comprende English and force you to reword and reword and reword and reword until you yourself have garred up the explanation into something unrecognizable. Don't fall for it, if they can't understand simple Engish, let that be their problem.
The OP question has been asked and answered 1,000 times, let him or her writhe in stupidity on their own.
For everyone else, these trolls and mental midgets will do this if you attempt to answer this same question every single day:
They act as is they no comprende English and force you to reword and reword and reword and reword until you yourself have garred up the explanation into something unrecognizable. Don't fall for it, if they can't understand simple Engish, let that be their problem.
The OP question has been asked and answered 1,000 times, let him or her writhe in stupidity on their own.
re: Thanks founding Fathers, Not!
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/28/20 at 1:28 pm to CelticDog
quote:
or you can say it was more like treason than a misdemeanor
Lol so let's suggest the thing that's punishable by death why don't we. You are one of the top 3 worst and most uninformed people who shouldn't be allowed to post on this board.
re: I Didn’t Watch or Listen to Any Impeachment proceedings
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/21/20 at 6:16 pm to the808bass
Same
re: More analayis of the trade deal most here will not want to read or hear
Posted by accusatory_giblet on 1/19/20 at 10:25 pm to I B Freeman
In my time lurking I've paid attention to your threads. Do you wake up each morning and start the process of identifying the day's worth of criticism of Donald Trump's economic and trade policies?
Popular
53
