re: Maxine Waters commits 3 ethics violations

Sharpton has owed the IRS millions for years and no one has raided his house and seized all records.
Manafort is in solitary confinement since day 1.
Why is that??

quote:

---

Umm if a Republican did this, they’d be driven out of office. The charges relate to whether Waters gave inappropriate assistance to a bank to which she had personal connections in getting federal bailout money. The committee says Waters organized a meeting in 2008 between Treasury officials and executives from OneUnited Bank, where her husband was once a board member and had large investments. The bank received $12 million from the federal government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. Media silent

---

Maxine's corruption has been known for a long time, it's a perfect illustration how relatively dumb people can become quite wealthy if they know how to play the politics game...., DC is full of these people. They enter the Swamp with modest wealth, after being in the Swamp 20-40 years their wealth is usually substantially greater and typically more than they should have accrued living in one of the most expensive places and making less than $200k annually.

quote:

---

there needs to be a damn investigation of the Fking Justice Dept / FBI!

---

They do investigations all the time. The problem is they investigate themselves.... therefore always come up clean and empty handed.

quote:

---

Key discovery from this investigation will be that Waters can neither spell or correctly pronounce the word “ethics”.

---

But can she correctly pair either/or and neither/nor?

quote:

---

This stuff never gets traction as many, if not the majority, of 'We the People' are lawless themselves. If it were not so these people wouldn't be elected in the first place much less remain in Office

---

That doesn't really seem too accurate.

Lawless has a rather broad sweep of definition in my way of thinking, likely why it comes across as not terribly accurate, if at all...I understand

quote:

---

Lawless has a rather broad sweep of definition in my way of thinking, likely why it comes across as not terribly accurate, if at all...I understand

---

It seems that you implied giving a pass for political corruption is seeded in the idea that very Joe and Jane Sweatsock identifies with some crimes being ok because they recognize themselves as criminal.

Lawless is not necessarily criminal, could be moral as well as ethical