- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Walsh: Debunking the Erika Kirk Conspiracy Theories
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:02 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:02 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Almost seems coordinated
Its not
It’s just people reacting to Candace’s new “docuseries,” where she claims she has evidence that Erika is an opportunist who killed her husband. That’s not a coordinated attack. It’s a predictable response to something outrageous she put into the world.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:05 pm to stout
quote:
where she claims she has evidence that Erika is an opportunist who killed her husband. That’s not a coordinated attack. It’s a predictable response to something outrageous she put into the world.
Where they all use the same language? uh huh
People keep saying she's claimed that Erika killed Charlie. Got any proof of that?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:07 pm to wackatimesthree
The fricking governor got behind the podium and stated we got our guy no reason to look any further. Then they paved of Kirk's assassination site before his funeral.
No fricking way Kirk was kllled by a 30 06 bullet.
No fricking way Kirk was kllled by a 30 06 bullet.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:08 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
What language specifically? That she is nuts?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:11 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
Yes because the narrative that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk is complete bunk with no real investigation.
Questioning the narrative isn't the same as accusing the widow of conspiring to murder her husband, with absolutely no evidence to support it. One could be reasonable. The other should require psychiatric analysis.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:15 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Questioning the narrative isn't the same as accusing the widow of conspiring to murder her husband,
Show where Candace is accusing Erika of conspiring to kill her husband?
You won't because you can't . Candace haters make accusation but never back them up.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:16 pm to stout
just don't understand why grown men find this interesting.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:27 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
Show where Candace is accusing Erika of conspiring to kill her husband?
What narrative do you think she is trying to create by constantly attacking Erika and doing a whole 5 part docuseries?
quote:
Candace haters make accusation but never back them up.
Sweet, sweet irony
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:31 pm to Zephyrius
I caught on to that with very little effort. There was enough in thr Walsh video to gleen that, but I just spent 10 minutes on her X account because od this thread. You don't think she has very strongly implied that exact narrative?
How about this, questioning the narrative and then telling her fans that the French paid a Mossad agent to kill her because she was doing it is different than doubting the bullet caliber used.
How about this, questioning the narrative and then telling her fans that the French paid a Mossad agent to kill her because she was doing it is different than doubting the bullet caliber used.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:13 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
So, they are unqualified to speak on conspiracy theories because they don't believe the stupid conspiracy theory that you believe?
Right. So even as emails emerge showing Ghislaine Maxwell being invited to sit on a secret 9-11 shadow commission this frickin retard still thinks it's all a "stupid conspiracy theory."
I love calling you clowns to the floor. It works every time.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:18 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
wackatimesthree
I love these clown who have no fan affiliation on a sports board and spend hours at a time trying to convince people that "status quo is the way to go." There are dozens of them and they're all exactly the same.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:24 pm to stout
Owens was wanting to be the voice of Charlie. She was probably very confident that tpusa would have her be the new face of the organization. She would've been able to funnel in a lot more money.
But the widow started taking control of tpusa. Most likely because Charlie and erika knew long ago that owens was a political whore who would say and do anything for money.. so erika didn't want her around Charlie's tpusa legacy, in any significant way.
Give Owens tpusa and tpusa would've been all about boo joos and Macron's wife having a penis.
But the widow started taking control of tpusa. Most likely because Charlie and erika knew long ago that owens was a political whore who would say and do anything for money.. so erika didn't want her around Charlie's tpusa legacy, in any significant way.
Give Owens tpusa and tpusa would've been all about boo joos and Macron's wife having a penis.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:33 pm to AlterEd
The jaded protégé theory is at least as plausible as the bat shite theories Owens has yall buying into. 
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:36 pm to GRTiger
I'll repeat, I've never listened to a single Candace Owens podcast. This isn't about that. I called into question the very first claim of the OPs video. The guy is a fricking moron.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:39 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The guy is a fricking moron.
He isn't, but I've listened to more than 10 seconds of him.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:40 pm to GRTiger
All bullshite from you making claims and not backing them up.
Of course you can't back up your claim that Candace said Erika conspired to kill Charlie. That's what you said and you can't back it up.
Erika is lying
Andrew Kolvet is lying
Brian Harpol is lying
Josh Hammer is lying
etc
Weird. Why all the lies
Of course you can't back up your claim that Candace said Erika conspired to kill Charlie. That's what you said and you can't back it up.
Erika is lying
Andrew Kolvet is lying
Brian Harpol is lying
Josh Hammer is lying
etc
Weird. Why all the lies
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:44 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
All bullshite from you making claims and not backing them up.
A clown op. Which, if anything makes me want to listen to what Candace has to say. If they can't be honest in their criticisms, and they're damn near unanimous in their lies, there is an agenda at play.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:48 pm to Zephyrius
Watch the video in the OP, or don't. I'm opining on the topic qnd what I saw. If your beliefs are too fragile to watch it, just leave the thread.
Two of you talking shite from an admitted place of ignorance is quite the PT board move.
Two of you talking shite from an admitted place of ignorance is quite the PT board move.
Popular
Back to top



1





