- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:05 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'd not HATE them
Tucker doesn't either... except in the misquotes of the perpetually offended.
Also, "more than anything"... have you never declared something "the worst"?
I took a walk around sunset yesterday in a botanical garden, got absolutely swarmed by gnats, skeeters or noseeums, dunno which but I got swarmed. I hated it more than anything in that moment in time. Even said so.
Obviously there are things more detestable- but in that moment those swarming bugs were "the worst".
I'll grant you one thing- if I had the tendency to be as maliciously misquoted as say, Tucker or Trump, I'd definitely guard my speech better. Never know when someone is going to nitpick a gotcha.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:07 am to HagaDaga
quote:well NF wasn’t an elected official talking about bombing Iran
True and Tucker typically takes that approach, but not to long ago he didn't do that with his Ted Cruz "interview". Agree with Cruz or not, but it's hard for Tucker to say he's not picking sides when you look at the way he approached the 2 interviews with similar topics.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:09 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:Negative. Were that true, we would never have invaded Iraq. Israel-firsts said "Leave Iraq alone. Go after Iran." Desert Storm started the neocon crap, or arguably Operation Just Cause. Neither were Zionist.
That's how neocons were born bro.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:10 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
He was probably more well behaved on Tucker than he is on his own podcast etc.
This was my first exposure to NF... and I imagine you're right. For the visceral dislike he's garnered, it's not explainable if he's always like he was on this TC interview.
Then again, who knows? I've seen people ripped to shreds over nothing before- it seems like once people get a reputation, there's nothing they can say or do that won't be twisted, misconstrued or outright lied about. My evidence for this is Trump and Tucker off the top of my head.
Otoh... there were definitely things within this interview from NF that I disagreed with, was taken aback by or scratched my head over.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:15 am to SallysHuman
quote:Let's try this once more for the parser.
I'd not HATE them
Tucker doesn't either...
I'd not HATE them to the extent I disliked them more than anybody.
Got it?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:16 am to SallysHuman
He was the same way on PBD
He’s not going to be his edgelord zoomer self on someone else’s show
He’s not going to be his edgelord zoomer self on someone else’s show
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
we justifiably write it off to rationale associated with double digit IQs. Tucker is not in that category. He knows better. Something is very off with him.
Who knows maybe Tucker and those like him are getting a payday pimping Russian, Chinese, Muzzy divider propaganda designed to divide Americans and the West.
This ahole and anybody buying this trash is a traitor.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'd not HATE them to the extent I disliked them more than anybody.
That's good.
Dunno what your point is aside from attributing a malice to TC that doesn't exist.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:24 am to SallysHuman
quote:Good Lord
This was my first exposure to NF...
You went to the mat for this POS, and for Tucker's kit-glove interview of him, without making the effort to background Fuentes? So you have no clue as to what a POS Fuentes is? No wonder you were clueless about the holocaust reference. Wow. Just wow!
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:25 am to Sassafrasology
It feels like DJT heard feedback about how upset a large part of the base is and has started to come back towards us.
As angry as I was with him, I feel like I overstepped and should realize that he (more than any other politician I've ever seen) really does take feedback from his base and make changes when necessary.
He did it several times in the first term and also during his run in 2024.
Glad to be back on board.
I want to apologize to people on here that I've irritated with my antagonistic style lately. I do love DJT and just want what's best for America.
As angry as I was with him, I feel like I overstepped and should realize that he (more than any other politician I've ever seen) really does take feedback from his base and make changes when necessary.
He did it several times in the first term and also during his run in 2024.
Glad to be back on board.
I want to apologize to people on here that I've irritated with my antagonistic style lately. I do love DJT and just want what's best for America.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:34 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
You went to the mat for this POS
No. My posts were mostly concerning Tucker in context of this particular 2hr interview.
What little I had to say about NF was mainly that I didn't necessarily agree with some of what he said and my astonishment over the Stalin thing.
Maybe I was able to better take THIS interview at face value because I'm NOT steeped in all things NF or Tucker Carlson.
I'm a 40+ yr old woman- I've had no desire to listen to Fuentes, that Tate dude or any other thing that appeals to young men.
I've liked what I've seen of Tucker, mainly before he got booted from Fox- haven't seen much of him since. His maniacal giggle is off putting, but otherwise I like him well enough.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:36 am to SirWinston
quote:
Glad to be back on board. I want to apologize to people on here that I've irritated with my antagonistic style lately. I do love DJT and just want what's best for America.
Glad you're back on... but man, if you keep hopping off the train at every sign of turbulence, your ticket is gonna get revoked.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:39 am to Sassafrasology
Nick has said some stupid stuff. But I generally agree with 85% of what he says. We need more people like him
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:51 am to NC_Tigah
quote:As pointed out, he did not say, "hate."
During the interview, Carlson said of Christians who support Israel "I hate them more than anybody."
TC hates Christians who support Israel more than anyone? More than cartel terrorists dismembering someone's wife or child. More than subhominid islamists stoning a girl to death for disobeying her husband in an arranged marriage?
That was TC's statement.
It was not Fuentes' statement.
And since then TC has walked that back and said he was angry and misspoke and used his words wrong. That's quite literally the only thing I see the idealogues like yourself grasping on to with this interview: "Tucker Carlson said he hates pro Zionist Christians."
See, now you have become the problem when you do this. It's a bad look. A very bad look, and it damages your cause.
It's all a moot point anyway. In 10-15 years Israel first Zionism in America will be a thing of the past. The cat is out of the bag: It's bad theology, it's bad foreign policy, and it's bad domestically. The only winners are the boomer dispensationalists for feel good reasons, and zionists for actual concrete reasons. The modern day state of Israel has every right to exist and kick the arse of their enemies. They do not, however, have a right to the American taxpayer's wallet nor the blood of our sons to do it. They will adhere to our lobbying laws as a foreign country, or they will have to leave, and they have no right to infiltrate and control the highest echelons of our government in their own interest. You can cope and seethe all you want, but America first is the future.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:53 am to RidiculousHype
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. fuentes is horrid. did sally find 'stalin' in her begotten search?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:58 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:Yes it does, and yours as well.
That says something about your own faith. Not Tucker's views.
See, in my view for example, I'd dislike a satanist who ritually raped and murdered prepubescent kids far more than a Christian who preferred Israel over the Islamic totalitarian regimes surrounding it. But if you wouldn't, and it's a matter of your "Faith," you be you, bro
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:58 am to cajunangelle
quote:
fuentes is horrid. did sally find 'stalin' in her begotten search?
I did. I read the entire interview.
Idk what the hell NF meant, it is off putting to say the least.
Although as creepy weird as it was... that's another slight misquote. He said "I WAS an admirer". Or maybe "always an admirer"?
He also said "I'm a fan" exactly. Yuck.
Tucker didn't agree with him, though... so... ?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:02 pm to mudshuvl05
quote:
See, now you have become the problem when you do this. It's a bad look. A very bad look, and it damages your cause.
It's all a moot point anyway. In 10-15 years Israel first Zionism in America will be a thing of the past. The cat is out of the bag: It's bad theology, it's bad foreign policy, and it's bad domestically.
The only winners are the boomer dispensationalists for feel good reasons, and zionists for actual concrete reasons.
The modern day state of Israel has every right to exist and kick the arse of their enemies. They do not, however, have a right to the American taxpayer's wallet nor the blood of our sons to do it.
All this... /^\
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:19 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
. Were that true, we would never have invaded Iraq. Israel-firsts said "Leave Iraq alone. Go after Iran." Desert Storm started the neocon crap, or arguably Operation Just Cause. Neither were Zionist.
Yeah man. Old Bibi's 7 point plan is almost to fruition.
You are fricking gaslighting now, I see!
quote:
The idea of a plan for Israel to go to war with multiple countries is most likely a reference to the 1996 policy paper "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm", which was prepared for then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
This report was written by a study group led by American political advisor Richard Perle, with several co-authors. "A Clean Break" proposed a more aggressive foreign policy for Israel in the Middle East. Key recommendations included the removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and containing Syria through various means.
Although the report did not specifically call for war with seven nations, its strategy of actively confronting adversaries has been linked to later discussions about a potential "seven fronts" conflict. Separately, former U.S. Army General Wesley Clark mentioned a classified U.S. plan after 9/11 to target seven countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran) over five years. This U.S. plan is distinct from the Israeli policy paper but is sometimes associated with it.
One more left.
And the United States did their bidding...nothing to see here. The neocons and Israel first are not the same
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News