- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie is Consistent: He called for Release of Names in Congressional Hush Fund
Posted on 1/21/26 at 1:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 1/21/26 at 1:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
What lie? I said that IvoryBillMatt wasn't aware of it
quote:
by IvoryBillMatt
Using multiple accounts huh?
1
Posted on 1/21/26 at 1:59 pm to Jugbow
quote:
The same person is getting called out because he said Massie is the one who exposed it.
Your problem is you don't read/comprehend well.
What he said was that Massie was the first he heard expose it. When it was pointed out it was exposed before Massie, I think he has acknowledged that - right?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 1:59 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think he has acknowledged that - right?
Pull his cock out for him too the next time you go to the bathroom.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:04 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Pull his cock out for him too the next time you go to the bathroom.
You're not helping your reputation as a retard with this kind of shite.
It's okay to be wrong, jugbow. Just acknowledge it, learn and move on.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:04 pm to Bourre
quote:
You’re just going to ignore the fact that it’s been pointed out the Massie wasn’t the first to bring attention to the congressional hush fund. That it was a democrat in 2017.
And you wonder why you have no credibility. It’s ok to admit a mistake
I am not ignoring it. I thanked you for pointing it out, but I'm not sure what the Congressman you cited (sorry, haven't had time to review yet) has had to say about release of the Epstein files. Jugbow's point was that Congress was being hypocrites in pretending that they cared about transparency re Epstein but not regarding their own hush fund.
I was pointing out that that hypocrisy is probably true for most Congressmen, but it isn't true of Massie (and, later MTG) because he wants transparency on BOTH issues.
What did I say that was wrong such that a rational person would doubt my credibility?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:05 pm to David_DJS
quote:
You're not helping your reputation as a retard with this kind of shite.
Oh no David is worried about a guy he doesn’t know on a political forum
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:09 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I will be curious how much attention the 2017 information got back then
Good grief. You were literally begging posters to name someone else who had exposed the fund before Massie said anything about it in your OP. I gave you a quick historical lesson on the history of the exposure. Yes, it was a big news story in 2017. If Massie was so concerned, why hasn’t he done something about it 6 years later?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:09 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Oh no David is worried about a guy he doesn’t know on a political forum
You don't understand the meaning of words. This thread is littered with your reactions to things not posted.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:09 pm to Bourre
quote:
If Massie was so concerned, why hasn’t he done something about it 6 years later?
Consistent!!! Haha
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:09 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Using multiple accounts huh?
No, and that's a serious accusation, as you know from our discussion yesterday about the possibility of you using an alter.
I referred to myself in the third person, because you can't capitalize "I." I wanted to emphasize that I hadn't heard about the hush fund until Massie mentioned it in 2024. I wasn't claiming that I knew no other Congressmen had ever mentioned it before. That's why I asked if others had.
When did you first hear of the hush fund?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:11 pm to David_DJS
You’re not understanding that idgaf what David_DJS thinks.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
No, and that's a serious accusation
Lmao this is the internet and you’ve done the exact same to me.
quote:
as you know from our discussion yesterday about the possibility of you using an alter.
And you said you wouldn’t engage with me further. Instead you decide to make a thread off of my thread with a two year old tweet to draw attention. I even thanked you for it. Don’t start being righteous when you’re truly a pos.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
What did I say that was wrong such that a rational person would doubt my credibility?
You stating, in multiple post, that Massie was the first to bring attention to the congressional hush fund. Which is flat out false so I helped you out with some facts
I asked earlier….. if it’s been public knowledge since 2017, why hasn’t he or anyone else championed that cause as well? He’s had 6 years since it was exposed
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Foxes guarding the hen house.
When the foxes make the laws, the foxes will never break the laws.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:15 pm to Bourre
This thread is done with the two goons being retarded. I’m out
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:21 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Put down the AI
AI isn't the answer to everything, but it's a time saver. I didn't know anything about the regulations regarding the hush fund. Now I do.
Some of us like to inform ourselves...and, even, wait for it...change our opinions based on receipt of better information.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:27 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
FWIW, ChatGPT thinks he cannot release the names even if he knows them:
"Bottom line
Massie cannot release the names himself.
What he can do is force the issue politically and legislatively — which is exactly what he’s trying to do."
I have often thought that a FOIA request for the names and claims should be made and when they refuse and cite the statute, sue
I think going up to SCOTUS would be enlightening how they get to create their own law protecting themselves and spending our money is somehow allowed to be privileged.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:28 pm to IvoryBillMatt
How about just getting rid of the slush fund?…
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:38 pm to Jugbow
quote:
But you think bondi can release court sealed documents
She is required by law to release everything (other than information relating to victim identity and a few other narrow exceptions) in the DOJ files.
The sealed argument is a red herring. Massie's law can be used as the basis to unseal documents. To her Bondi's credit, the DOJ has successfully moved to have some documents unsealed.
But, whatever remains sealed under court order is miniscule and largely irrelevant.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 2:48 pm to Bourre
quote:
You stating, in multiple post, that Massie was the first to bring attention to the congressional hush fund. Which is flat out false so I helped you out with some facts
I asked earlier….. if it’s been public knowledge since 2017, why hasn’t he or anyone else championed that cause as well? He’s had 6 years since it was exposed
I didn't claim to know whether Massie was the first to mention it. I said that I hadn't heard others mention it and ask if others had. You pointed out the 2017 publicity.
The title and point of the thread was that Massie was consistent. He advocated for transparency in both the hush fund and the Epstein files.
As I stated in the beginning:
quote:
Maybe Massie is to be faulted for not passing a bill like with Epstein, but I doubt he could get Congress to pass a bill that revealed its secrets...even the ones for which we paid.
I don't know anything beyond that. Maybe he has tried, but realized that he couldn't get legislation passed that would hurt members of Congress. Has any other Congressman done anything about publicizing the names? Has any other Congressman (other than MTG) used social media to bring the issue to people's attention?
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 4:15 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News